Jump to content

Jimmy Having Himself a Hit Parede(s)


Yardball85

Recommended Posts

I won't pretend to know what is going on with Paredes. But you could count the number of MVP-caliber performances following seasons where a guy was waived after being the 10th-best player on a AAA team on zero fingers.

J.D. Martinez was kinda like that though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 130
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Maybe our new hitting coach has helped him by correcting something in his swing or hitting approach?

Possibly, but he hit .300/.800 during his call-up last year at the end of the season, which was better than anyone expected given his minor league numbers (.826, .805, and .789 in three years of AAA). Even that level of performance folks were saying was unsustainable in MLB. Now he his hitting .346/1.001.

I have to think there is a combination of "stars aligning" here - some of this a higher "new normal," some good luck, some confidence from a hot streak, maybe a mechanics tweak that's working.

If he could replicate his best minor league numbers and maintain .290/.800 with 10-15 HR that would still be a massive coup for the O's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not counting on an MVP-caliber performance out of Paredes, but I have to say, just watching him at the plate both last year and this one, he just looks pretty darned good up there. And I'm not just talking about the results (though I'm sure they influence my perception a lot). He's got a nice stance, a nice swing, a good approach and is pretty strong. I'm not going to assume that he's sub-.700 OPS guy in the long term, based on what I'm seeing.

There's a difference between looking good and being good. There's a difference between being good and being "locked in."

I've shot 66 on a golf course. And I've shot 100. I'm not good at all but I've had my streaks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's a difference between looking good and being good. There's a difference between being good and being "locked in."

I've shot 66 on a golf course. And I've shot 100. I'm not good at all but I've had my streaks.

And that's not saying we (Buck) doesn't ride this horse into the ground until he drops. :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's a difference between looking good and being good. There's a difference between being good and being "locked in."

I've shot 66 on a golf course. And I've shot 100. I'm not good at all but I've had my streaks.

To shot 66 you have to be good!:) That's not a score for a streaky player. If you said 78 to 100 that is believable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's a difference between looking good and being good. There's a difference between being good and being "locked in."

I've shot 66 on a golf course. And I've shot 100. I'm not good at all but I've had my streaks.

I played four rounds in April and on one of them I shot a 66. On the front nine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I played four rounds in April and on one of them I shot a 66. On the front nine.

You and I should play together sometime. Though I can't remember the last time I played four rounds of golf in a month, and it's been at least five years since I played four rounds in a year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Note that all of my prior comments were about Paredes from the left side as I haven't seen him much from the right side. He didn't look nearly as good during the last two games from the right side.

That seems to be pretty common situation. They probably have less than 25% of their AB's from the right side, usually less power. Didn't Roberts have trouble from the right side until late in his career and Wieters hasn't had the numbers there either (I think). Some here were wondering why he doesn't just stay on the left side.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You and I should play together sometime. Though I can't remember the last time I played four rounds of golf in a month, and it's been at least five years since I played four rounds in a year.
My kind of golf right there. If my score starts with a 9, I'm ecstatic.

Since kids (2007) I've played a lot less. But my division at work now has a twice-annual golf weekend where a bunch of us get away and play three or four rounds. So in the last year I've played nine rounds - four on the fall trip, four on the spring trip, and one other. That's just enough to be frustratingly bad. Like two brilliant shots on a long par five, setting me up lying 20 yards from the green for my third shot. And then picking up for double par.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That seems to be pretty common situation. They probably have less than 25% of their AB's from the right side, usually less power. Didn't Roberts have trouble from the right side until late in his career and Wieters hasn't had the numbers there either (I think). Some here were wondering why he doesn't just stay on the left side.

Wieters is much much better from the right side.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since kids (2007) I've played a lot less. But my division at work now has a twice-annual golf weekend where a bunch of us get away and play three or four rounds. So in the last year I've played nine rounds - four on the fall trip, four on the spring trip, and one other. That's just enough to be frustratingly bad. Like two brilliant shots on a long par five, setting me up lying 20 yards from the green for my third shot. And then picking up for double par.

I've actually played a lot more since turning 30 fairly recently (2013). I'm now too out of shape and injury prone to continue playing competitive soccer so I've downgraded to co-ed rec leagues and softball has begun to bore me. I've turned to the old man games that I'll now play forever: golf and bowling.

I'm still bad at golf but improving slowly. I joined the Baltimore chapter of the Mediocre Golf Association and it's a blast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've actually played a lot more since turning 30 fairly recently (2013). I'm now too out of shape and injury prone to continue playing competitive soccer so I've downgraded to co-ed rec leagues and softball has begun to bore me. I've turned to the old man games that I'll now play forever: golf and bowling.

I'm still bad at golf but improving slowly. I joined the Baltimore chapter of the Mediocre Golf Association and it's a blast.

At 43, almost 44, I'm still playing co-ed competitive indoor soccer! I'll admit I'm the ~9th best player on the team with a roster of 10 or 11.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At 43, almost 44, I'm still playing co-ed competitive indoor soccer! I'll admit I'm the ~9th best player on the team with a roster of 10 or 11.

I'm sure I will be too, that's the game I'll never be able to give up. However, playing with 18-24 kids in high level men's leagues both indoor and outdoor take their toll when you're approaching 30 and don't have the same time to stay in top physical condition anymore. A shoulder surgery and two knee surgeries later and competitive co-ed leagues it is from now on. It's a much more relaxed game and safer for me :)

I definitely miss the intensity sometimes though. I don't know where you play indoor but I played in La Liga (the first division men's league) at Soccerdome in Jessup for over a decade. That league is intense, like fist fights breaking out on a weekly basis intense. That was the first one I gave up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Where in the rules does it state this? I mean, it makes sense I guess.
    • Gametime:  4:05 pm Forecast:  MId 50s to low 60s, cloudy, chance of rain Promotion:  Brandon Hyde Bobblehead, gates open early and music on Eutaw Street Matchup:  JP Sears (L) vs Cole Irvin (L) Lineups Later -- I will not be around, someone else will have to add them  
    • If you "reconstruct the inning without the errors" that means you replay the inning without the ghost runner.   So on that ground ball that got the runner at the plate, you now assume Langeliers would have been thrown out at first.
    • So I looked up the rule book and I can't find anything that says this is the case. Maybe I'm missing it because the rules for unearned runs can be convuluted to say the least. "For purposes of calculating earned runs under Rule 9.16, the runner who begins an inning on second base pursuant to this rule shall be deemed to be a runner who has reached second base because of a fielding error, but no error shall be charged to the opposing team or to any player. For purposes of Rule 9.02, the Official Scorer shall keep records of the number of times each batter and runner is placed at second base in accordance with this rule." In the rulebook under unearned runs it states, "An earned run is a run for which a pitcher is held accountable. In determining earned runs, the Official Scorer shall reconstruct the inning without the errors (which exclude catcher’s interference) and passed balls, giving the benefit of the doubt always to the pitcher in determining which bases would have been reached by runners had there been errorless play. For the purpose of determining earned runs, an intentional base on balls, regardless of the circumstances, shall be construed in exactly the same manner as any other base on balls. (a)  The Official Scorer shall charge an earned run against a pitcher every time a runner reaches home base by the aid of safe hits, sacrifice bunts, a sacrifice fly, stolen bases, putouts, fielder’s choices, bases on balls, hit batters, balks or wild pitches (including a wild pitch on third strike that permits a batter to reach first base) before fielding chances have been offered to put out the offensive team. For the purpose of this rule, a defensive interference penalty shall be construed as a fielding chance. A wild pitch is solely the pitcher’s fault and shall contribute to an earned run just as a base on balls or a balk." I don't see where it states a batter that reaches on a fielder's choice due to a runner being being on due to error.   
    • Joe Posnanski wrote a wonderful book, called “The Baseball 100,” his 100 greatest players. It’s full of wonderful quotes, but it leaves out a quote that is not just all of Baseball in three words, but that applies to all of life. ”Sometimes you suck.” Adam Jones. God bless Adam Jones. Yes, Hyde makes boneheaded decisions almost every game. Yes Mike should have done this or not done that, Yes Cowser shouldn’t have thrown that way, Ryan shouldn’t have missed the fly, yada yada. I was screaming as loud as anyone. My wife said,”I thought you liked baseball,” But now it’s tomorrow.  “Sometimes you suck.” Charge on.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...