Jump to content

Three years of OBP: the funny thing about Free Agents


Enjoy Terror

Recommended Posts

Pos	Name	        Team		PA	OBPChris Davis	Orioles	FA	1868	0.347Steve Pearce	Orioles	FA	846	0.339Gerardo Parra	Orioles	FA	1826	0.320Delmon Young	Orioles	FA	796	0.313Everth Cabrera	Orioles	FA	931	0.308Matt Wieters	Orioles	FA	973	0.302Chris Parmelee	Orioles	FA	705	0.3013B	Manny Machado	Orioles		1777	0.334CF	Adam Jones	Orioles		1952	0.313LF	Nolan Reimold	Orioles		413	0.300David Lough	Orioles		676	0.296BC	Steve Clevenger	Orioles		226	0.296SS	J.J. Hardy	Orioles		1650	0.293DH	Jimmy Paredes	Orioles		584	0.292RF	Dariel Alvarez	Orioles		31	0.290UT	Ryan Flaherty	Orioles		884	0.287Henry Urrutia	Orioles		94	0.287C	Caleb Joseph	Orioles		630	0.284OF	Junior Lake	Orioles		664	0.278IF	Rey Navarro	Orioles		30	0.2762B	Jonathan Schoop	Orioles		817	0.2701B	Christn Walker	Orioles		31	0.258Paul Janish	Orioles		81	0.247

Isn't it interesting that other than Jones and Machado, no other current Orioles have tallied a 3 year sample of OBP over .300? And every single player that is currently a major league free agent position player for us does?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is downright frightening. I think Reimold's three-year OBP is not indicative of his ability to get on base, and is just a product of his 2013-14 injuries. But most of the others are guys who are likely to remain sub-.300. I have some hope that Schoop will continue improving and get to the .310-.320 range eventually, but it may not happen in 2016.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is downright frightening. I think Reimold's three-year OBP is not indicative of his ability to get on base, and is just a product of his 2013-14 injuries. But most of the others are guys who are likely to remain sub-.300. I have some hope that Schoop will continue improving and get to the .310-.320 range eventually, but it may not happen in 2016.

Reimold has shown no indication of being a full time player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reimold has shown no indication of being a full time player.

I didn't mean to suggest he was. But I do believe his .327 career OBP and his .344 OBP in 2015 are more indicative of his on base abilities than his .300 OBP over the last three years, which includes two years when he was recuperating from neck surgery.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't mean to suggest he was. But I do believe his .327 career OBP and his .344 OBP in 2015 are more indicative of his on base abilities than his .300 OBP over the last three years, which includes two years when he was recuperating from neck surgery.

I believe that he is an aging part time player. On a real good team, he could be useful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only 2 teams, the Giants and Astros, swung at more pitches outside the strike zone last year. Only 4 teams, the Mariners, Cubs, Rays and Astros, had a lower contact rate at pitches outside the strike zone.

The Orioles would be a much better team if they learned where the strike zone is and prioritized hitters who knew what the strike zone was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only 2 teams, the Giants and Astros, swung at more pitches outside the strike zone last year. Only 4 teams, the Mariners, Cubs, Rays and Astros, had a lower contact rate at pitches outside the strike zone.

The Orioles would be a much better team if they learned where the strike zone is and prioritized hitters who knew what the strike zone was.

It is kind of interesting that two of the four teams with a lower contact rate of pitches outside the strike zone made it to the ALDS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores

News

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2022 Top 75 Prospects

Statistics

2022 Orioles Stats

2022 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats



  • Posts

    • Not disagreeing with you it’s just a team that would likely trade for Urias would be “contending”.  Those types of teams just don’t trade away pitching. They don’t. So we’re looking at a prospect return, when right now we need MLB immediate help. 
    • Totally agree. The guy is a buffoon pure and simple. Might actually be WORSE than his father. I am starting to feel like this team will not be sold and we will be stuck w/ mediocrity for decades more to come. Prove me wrong John! Extend Adley and Gunnar and sign some bigger free agents next off season.
    • We desperately need Grayson to pitch his way into our rotation so that we can bump Wells to the pen. We might be better with Voth in the rotation over Wells right now because we need MR/SU help bad. 
    • I know that they played the same positions last year at Fenway, but I almost wonder if it would make more sense to just leave Hays in LF and Santander in RF (when he's in the OF) regardless of stadium. I get the logic of Hays covering more ground, but there is an adjustment to how the ball comes off the bat and I wonder if the overall defense throughout the course of the season would be improved if they consistently get the same looks, playing the same positions. Ultimately, it probably doesn't matter, but just me wondering. 
    • My issue isn’t the $8 million we gave Frazier. It’s the thought process of Elias. He trades away Jorge Looez last year because he was hitting the last two years of arb. That Lopez trade hurt us last year, and it’s going to hurt us this year. So Bautista took of vet Lopez as closer. However, who is taking over for Bautista for RH set up?  So was the Jorge Lopez trade worth it, considering we were so close to the WC last year, and should contend this year? Hindisight is 20/20, but it looks like we would’ve been better off keeping Lopez in MR/SU, filling out the IF with a combo of in house options, not signing Givens for $7 million, then spending the $15 million on another SP.    We could be stacked right now if we would’ve signed a pitcher and added $15 million in salary. With Lopez and Wells in MR/SU.    Elias hasn’t had good resource allocation. You don’t just trade away relievers that throw 99 mph sinkers. Not when your window is just opening. You also don’t sign FAs when the strength of your org is MI.    The real shame is going to be that we might have to turn to GR for MR, and give him the Gausman treatment. It’s going to get really frustrating watching the Lineup and SP give us leads with this bullpen. 
    • This was my first experience with watching the new rules in play and it will take me time to adjust. I was forced to watch on MLB extra innings..hence Sox announcers. The didn't care for the Devers call, but he was admiring the long foul ball he hit the previous pitch. They were complaining that the pitcher wasn't even on the rubber yet. I do like the shortened time between innings and for the most part the better pace of the game. I didn't care for lack of replays..like AR's first inning HR, not that the Sox announcers would have said much. I don't need to see replays over and over again, but one good time is plenty. What are they going to do when a player has a milestone game and fans want to give him an ovation?? Umpire's discretion?? Announcers will have to adjust too, they really don't have much time to complain about close pitches before the next pitch happens. I also enjoy not watching batters adjust their batting gloves after every pitch.
    • Part of me wants to make a Sons of Sam Horn account and just casually drop this there. But that site is ungodly to look at in format.  OH is so much easily to navigate and more aesthetically pleasing.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...