Jump to content

Offseason Rumors and Deals Around MLB


neveradoubt

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I would trade for Votto. He's a great player.

$20 million in 2016, $22 million in 2017 and $25 million in each of the following six seasons. The Reds have a $20 million option for 2024 with a $7 million buyout

A minimum 200 million eight year. The Chris Davis deal!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Joey Votto is your first baseman tomorrow if you want the contract. He's the Todd Helton of his era.

The Reds would have to eat some of the contract ...but Votto has an OPS of 1000. He also had a OBP of .423 this year and a career number in that ballpark. Yeah he'd be an easy choice for me over Davis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Joey Votto is your first baseman tomorrow if you want the contract. He's the Todd Helton of his era.

Is that true? Bad enough that they traded Frazier and may move Phillips and Bruce, and tried to move Chapman. It would be a PR disaster to dump Votto. His salary is completely reasonable.

.459 OBP and that was not even a career high! 7.6 WAR last year. That's Manny-esque. I would much rather have Votto for 8/$200 than Davis for 7/$150. I would give them Bundy and Mancini, but if I can get him in a salary dump that would be fine with me too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is that true? Bad enough that they traded Frazier and may move Phillips and Bruce, and tried to move Chapman. It would be a PR disaster to dump Votto. His salary is completely reasonable.

.459 OBP and that was not even a career high! 7.6 WAR last year. That's Manny-esque. I would much rather have Votto for 8/$200 than Davis for 7/$150. I would give them Bundy and Mancini, but if I can get him in a salary dump that would be fine with me too.

Sure, but he only stole 11 bases so most of the time he'd just be clogging the basepaths. And imagine how many more RBI he'd have if he expanded his strikezone with runners on instead of relying on someone else to produce runs. Beggars can't be choosers but is this really what we want in Baltimore? Plus, imagine the chaos in the clubhouse when Coolbaugh orders him to swing hard at every close pitch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is that true? Bad enough that they traded Frazier and may move Phillips and Bruce, and tried to move Chapman. It would be a PR disaster to dump Votto. His salary is completely reasonable.

.459 OBP and that was not even a career high! 7.6 WAR last year. That's Manny-esque. I would much rather have Votto for 8/$200 than Davis for 7/$150. I would give them Bundy and Mancini, but if I can get him in a salary dump that would be fine with me too.

The contract is categorized as un-tradable by all in the MLB. It extends into his 40s. Now, a couple more seasons like this last from him and in FA? Maybe then. Helton was a good player too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The contract is categorized as un-tradable by all in the MLB. It extends into his 40s. Now, a couple more seasons like this last from him and in FA? Maybe then. Helton was a good player too.

I could construct a reasonable HOF case for Helton. 54 fWAR isn't spectacular, but there are five HOF 1B who are below that. And many (maybe most) HOFers who didn't have his four 6+ win seasons. Votto could get there, too. He's over 40 wins at 32.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Reds would have to eat some of the contract ...but Votto has an OPS of 1000. He also had a OBP of .423 this year and a career number in that ballpark. Yeah he'd be an easy choice for me over Davis.

I would be so happy... I don't even think the Reds would need to eat much. Votto's getting a fair salary, it's the years that raise the red flag.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I could construct a reasonable HOF case for Helton. 54 fWAR isn't spectacular, but there are five HOF 1B who are below that. And many (maybe most) HOFers who didn't have his four 6+ win seasons.

Helton will suffer like Walker is right now. Larry Walker is a HOF player, but the voters can't see past the Coors Field effect.

Joey Votto meanwhile is going to blow past Helton with good health. Easier said than done -- see Helton, who past age 31 had a 111 OPS+.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • What you want is perfectly reasonable.  But you seem entirely to focused on money.  The team needs to work to improve.  I don't care what it costs, you shouldn't either.  They are going to spend money and payroll will be higher next year and the year after that.  We need them to make improvements and some of that is rightfully going to come from within and not cost much. The improvements that are needed are going to cost too, I'm not saying they wont.  But ownership and the GM should simply work in tandem to make sure the team has what it needs.  I am not really concerned about how much that costs because it should be able to be done without jumping this particular team into say top ten in payroll.
    • This is the right approach. the orioles should be spending more money and I believe they will, but I expect it to be measured with less risk (ie we won’t be handing out a Hader type deal or a  long term contract to Santander IMO) improving on some of the obvious weaknesses certainly makes sense.    1x SP: Burnes, Fried, Buehler 1x RH OF/DH: Martinez, O’Neill, Profar 1x 1B: (wishlist) Alonso, Walker
    • Interesting. I had forgotten that they signed him and then got him in the pitching lab in the offseason. Since September is prior to the end of the season, I would take "two year contract" to mean September '23 is Year 1, and then '24 is Year 2.  That is a cool article. Very encouraging how closely they are following the KBO. 
    • I think most teams would want to have an MVP candidate at quarterback.   Most of the time this will mean that he is better than the guy they currently have.  That's why. My quote was not taking salary into account.  If you take his current salary into account I think you are still talking about a majority of the NFL teams that would take him right now.  If the salary is an issue you find a way to make it work.  I'm starting to come around to the idea that the salary cap is kinda fake in a way after I keep seeing teams do stuff like adding void years other trickery to get the guys they want.
    • Well I sort of disagree here. You said guys have been bad to questionable. I think that’s wrong. I just think a few guys have been awful and that has really hurt us. I would absolutely give Washington more time. Brade and Kane are well liked but doubtful they want to play them much right now. A trade should be considered if things don’t improve.
    • Yeah, I'd rather keep him over Soto.  I mean Soto can't start.  Yes Soto was dominant at times out of the bullpen but he was also gasoline on a fire out of the bullpen.  I would rather pay Suarez $4 or 5 million, knowing he can start or pitch in the bullpen than Soto, knowing he can only start and is liable to melt down when needed most.  
    • It is funny how much Hays (the pre-2024 version anyway) matches the type of player they'll likely look for. I doubt that reunion happens though. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...