Jump to content

Should Orioles Trade For Sonny Gray? (Astros should be talking To Oakland according to photog)


section18

Recommended Posts

I think you don't understand the point I was making.

Would you like me to explain it for you?

You could have just explained it to me two posts ago, but since you're kind of a twatt I didn't expect you to. Have a go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 187
  • Created
  • Last Reply
You could have just explained it to me two posts ago, but since you're kind of a twatt I didn't expect you to. Have a go.

I figured maybe you wanted to go back and figure it out on your own.

Now this is the start of it.

Gausman and Schoop should pique their interest and I would expand it with another prospect or two IF Oakland could send us back a 2B prospect who is close to being MLB ready. To add a pitcher like Gray to this club would equal what Toronto did last year with Price. In short, it would clinch the division for us.

The poster is talking about how adding Gray would clinch the division this year for the O's like Price did for the Jays.

Here is the issue I had with what he said.

Let us say that both Price and Gray are 5 win guys as a baseline.

The Jays traded prospects for Price. They were able to remove a replacement level guy and replace him with ~2.0 or so wins of worth of Price.

The O's would be adding ~4.5 wins worth of Gray but would be subtracting lets say ~1.5 wins of Gausman and ~2.0 wins of Schoop.

The Jays in this instance are gaining 2 Wins in less than half of a season. The O's would be gaining 1 Win in 80% of a season.

The O's, by having to give up major league regulars, would not be seeing the same return at the ML level as the 2015 Jays did.

That is the point I was making. Further years of team control are irrelevant to that point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I figured maybe you wanted to go back and figure it out on your own.

Now this is the start of it.

The poster is talking about how adding Gray would clinch the division this year for the O's like Price did for the Jays.

Here is the issue I had with what he said.

Let us say that both Price and Gray are 5 win guys as a baseline.

The Jays traded prospects for Price. They were able to remove a replacement level guy and replace him with ~2.0 or so wins of worth of Price.

The O's would be adding ~4.5 wins worth of Gray but would be subtracting lets say ~1.5 wins of Gausman and ~2.0 wins of Schoop.

The Jays in this instance are gaining 2 Wins in less than half of a season. The O's would be gaining 1 Win in 80% of a season.

The O's, by having to give up major league regulars, would not be seeing the same return at the ML level as the 2015 Jays did.

That is the point I was making. Further years of team control are irrelevant to that point.

I thought you were just trying to wind me up, so I apologize for my insult. Thanks for the detailed reply. No, I didn't realize the intention of your original discussion was purely around WAR, which is why I posted my initial reply. But in my defense you could have just said what you said above in a much earlier, briefer and clearer post. It's not like threads and conversations always stay on one clear point.

But thanks again for the reply. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought you were just trying to wind me up, so I apologize for my insult. Thanks for the detailed reply. No, I didn't realize the intention of your original discussion was purely around WAR, which is why I posted my initial reply. But in my defense you could have just said what you said above in a much earlier, briefer and clearer post. It's not like threads and conversations always stay on one clear point.

But thanks again for the reply. :D

NP, and I have more fun doing things the hard way. :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought you were just trying to wind me up, so I apologize for my insult. Thanks for the detailed reply. No, I didn't realize the intention of your original discussion was purely around WAR, which is why I posted my initial reply. But in my defense you could have just said what you said above in a much earlier, briefer and clearer post. It's not like threads and conversations always stay on one clear point.

But thanks again for the reply. :D

BTW I wasn't strictly talking about WAR. I was using WAR as a shorthand to show that the O's would be losing production at the ML level. Yes Gray is great but how much of a dropoff is there from Schoop to Flaherty and Flaherty to whomever replaces him on the roster?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BTW I wasn't strictly talking about WAR. I was using WAR as a shorthand to show that the O's would be losing production at the ML level. Yes Gray is great but how much of a dropoff is there from Schoop to Flaherty and Flaherty to whomever replaces him on the roster?

But what if Baltimore had traded Britton for Javy Baez? Then we'd be cooking with gas...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Sonny Gray leaves after 3 2/3 innings, Fernando Rodriguez takes over. Over his past 12 2/3 innings, Gray has allowed 17 runs.</p>— Susan Slusser (@susanslusser) <a href="

">May 10, 2016</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Well I sort of disagree here. You said guys have been bad to questionable. I think that’s wrong. I just think a few guys have been awful and that has really hurt us. I would absolutely give Washington more time. Brade and Kane are well liked but doubtful they want to play them much right now. A trade should be considered if things don’t improve.
    • Yeah, I'd rather keep him over Soto.  I mean Soto can't start.  Yes Soto was dominant at times out of the bullpen but he was also gasoline on a fire out of the bullpen.  I would rather pay Suarez $4 or 5 million, knowing he can start or pitch in the bullpen than Soto, knowing he can only start and is liable to melt down when needed most.  
    • It is funny how much Hays (the pre-2024 version anyway) matches the type of player they'll likely look for. I doubt that reunion happens though. 
    • Weird thing about Suarez is that MASN had this being a 2 year deal when they talked about him back in April. ”The Orioles made another smart move with Suárez by signing him to a two-year contract in September. They knew what they’d ask from him and how it could contradict, and they didn’t want to give him any reasons to resist.” https://www.masnsports.com/blog/another-look-at-how-suarez-came-to-the-orioles
    • Dam the mosquito is in my Jelly. Please go away
    • Elias is refusing to spend money that Rubenstein has made available.  Do you have any sources?
    • Outside Hamilton, I can't really think of any areas or invidivuals outside the line that have really stepped up.  Humphrey and Stephens have played okay but it certainly hasn't offset the complete zeroes that Eddie Jackson and Marcus Williams have been.  I don't think you want to pull Hamilton off SS even though he can handle deep zone assignments fine, because he's essentially a linebacker that can cover wide receivers and there's too much value in that in the box.  And I think that Roquan/Simpson look lost in pass coverage because the safeties behind them are playing like butt.  Besides Roquan wasn't ever really a great coverage safety, he was kind of okay at it but he was never like a Lavonte David or Fred Warner there.   I'm starting to wonder if we need to either trade for a FS and/or start giving Ardarius Washington more snaps.  He certainly doesn't look worse than Jackson/Williams at this point in his limited playing time.  In general i think safety is an undervalued position so we're likely to get good value in trade.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...