Jump to content

Pressures on Wright as no one wants to be sent down to make room for Gausman


wildcard

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 92
  • Created
  • Last Reply
McFarland just pitched the best 5 innings we have seen from any O's pitcher this year and it was against the World Champs. I don't see him being sent down.

Worley has to stay up because he is out of options,

I think Wilson and Wright are pitching over the next two games for the right to stay.

Tillman, Jimenez, Gausman, (MaFarland or Worley) and (Wilson or Wright ) is the rotation going forward IMO.

So one decent performance in long relief completely wipes out the Texas debacle and the three years of mediocrity before that? Even though he doesn't strike anybody out, Wilson has done nothing but pitch at a very high level since he's been in the majors. Wright hasn't pitched as well but his stuff plays very well in the bullpen where he won't have to rely on his off-speed pitches as much. Both of them deserves to stay. The only time McFarland should ever be on the 25 man roster is if Matusz is out with an injury.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So one decent performance in long relief completely wipes out the Texas debacle and the three years of mediocrity before that? Even though he doesn't strike anybody out, Wilson has done nothing but pitch at a very high level since he's been in the majors. Wright hasn't pitched as well but his stuff plays very well in the bullpen where he won't have to rely on his off-speed pitches as much. Both of them deserves to stay. The only time McFarland should ever be on the 25 man roster is if Matusz is out with an injury.

Yes. He does get kudos for showing that he could do that to an energetic lineup. McFarland is not awful and all pitchers have bad outings, especially since T.J. came in with two on. Not the best position for him to succeed. He did make a lazy play on that grounder. That one stung.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So one decent performance in long relief completely wipes out the Texas debacle and the three years of mediocrity before that? Even though he doesn't strike anybody out, Wilson has done nothing but pitch at a very high level since he's been in the majors. Wright hasn't pitched as well but his stuff plays very well in the bullpen where he won't have to rely on his off-speed pitches as much. Both of them deserves to stay. The only time McFarland should ever be on the 25 man roster is if Matusz is out with an injury.

You thought Wilson pitched "at a very high level" last year at the ML level?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So one decent performance in long relief completely wipes out the Texas debacle and the three years of mediocrity before that? Even though he doesn't strike anybody out, Wilson has done nothing but pitch at a very high level since he's been in the majors. Wright hasn't pitched as well but his stuff plays very well in the bullpen where he won't have to rely on his off-speed pitches as much. Both of them deserves to stay. The only time McFarland should ever be on the 25 man roster is if Matusz is out with an injury.

I think you are being a little hard on McFarland. In three years plus 6 games this year as an Oriole he has a:

10-6 record, 3.84 ERA in 185 IP, 213 H, 62 BB, 121 SO, 1.49 WHIP

What that says is he has been successful in spite of giving up too many hits per innings pitched. His strikes are ok at 121 in 185 inning. It doesn't make him a strike pitcher but he is not terrible either.

In six games this year he has had 4 outing that have been scoreless. His ERA is 3.18. In 11.1 IP he has given up 8 hits and he has a WHIP of 0.97. So he is doing fine in 2016 so far.

He is the only pitcher on the staff that has pitched 5 scoreless innings in a game. I think that is someone that Buck probably wants on his staff.

What happens in the next two starts with Wilson and Wright will change the perception of what moves should be made. We will see. But for now I think Matusz up, Gallardp to the DL and wait until Monday for the next move to be determined.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you are being a little hard on McFarland. In three years plus 6 games this year as an Oriole he has a:

10-6 record, 3.84 ERA in 185 IP, 213 H, 62 BB, 121 SO, 1.49 WHIP

What that says is he has been successful in spite of giving up too many hits per innings pitched. His strikes are ok at 121 in 185 inning. It doesn't make him a strike pitcher but he is not terrible either.

In six games this year he has had 4 outing that have been scoreless. His ERA is 3.18. In 11.1 IP he has given up 8 hits and he has a WHIP of 0.97. So he is doing fine in 2016 so far.

He is the only pitcher on the staff that has pitched 5 scoreless innings in a game. I think that is something that Buck probably wants on this staff.

What happens in the next two starts with Wilson and Wright will change the perception of what moves should be made. We will see. But for now I think Matusz up, Gallardp to the DL and wait until Monday for the next move to be determined.

These are not very good numbers for a reliever, especially the WHIP. McFarland is what he is. An expendable swing man that is likely the sixth or seventh guy in your bullpen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You thought Wilson pitched "at a very high level" last year at the ML level?

He has a career ERA of 3.07 and career FIP of 3.59. He has a career ERA of 1.42 and WHIP of 1.21 as a reliever. He's excellent with runners on base holding opponents to a line of .205/.244/.294. Now he's not a starter and never will be but he's pitched very effectively out of the bullpen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These are not very good numbers for a reliever, especially the WHIP. McFarland is what he is. An expendable swing man that is likely the sixth or seventh guy in your bullpen.

I can agree with that. But the O's need a sixth or 7th guy in the pen that can be a swing man. He fits for now. How he pitches going forward will determine if the O's have someone better for the staff or if he does well enough to stay through out the season. So far he has been optioned every year he has had an option. So it would not surprise me if it happen again. However so far this year he looks better than some of the alternatives.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He has a career ERA of 3.07 and career FIP of 3.59. He has a career ERA of 1.42 and WHIP of 1.21 as a reliever. He's excellent with runners on base holding opponents to a line of .205/.244/.294. Now he's not a starter and never will be but he's pitched very effectively out of the bullpen.

Its a little early to know if Wilson will be a starter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice young man. He'll be 27 in September. It's now if he is. He won't get too many chances at age 2 or 29. He'll be a bullpen guy.

Your ability to see into the future is much better than mine. However, when a guy will be 27 in September most of the 2016 season he will pitch at age 26.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He has a career ERA of 3.07 and career FIP of 3.59. He has a career ERA of 1.42 and WHIP of 1.21 as a reliever. He's excellent with runners on base holding opponents to a line of .205/.244/.294. Now he's not a starter and never will be but he's pitched very effectively out of the bullpen.

I see you specified here he won't be a starter. I'm not sure I agree with that, but last year I thought he was very average. His FB is pedestrian and he had average command of the slider. His 1.389 WHIP and 3.3 SO P/9 do not stand out, but he's off to a better start SSS that it is this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your ability to see into the future is much better than mine. However, when a guy will be 27 in September most of the 2016 season he will pitch at age 26.

No. It's not my prognositcation. It's the fact that a starter needs to be a start by the time they turn 28. Wilson will need to do well the next year. It's not a guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These are not very good numbers for a reliever, especially the WHIP. McFarland is what he is. An expendable swing man that is likely the sixth or seventh guy in your bullpen.

This is omitting his best number - career 61.2% GB rate. That's extremely high. It's going to lead to a bad WHIP but still result in a pretty good pitcher.

He has a career 3.84 ERA, 3.77 FIP, 3.78 xFIP, and 3.49 SIERA. I agree it's not excellent for a reliever and he is a 6th or 7th guy in your pen - but he's quality at that, not necessarily expendable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Soto has had 6 years in the majors. Only 2 of them with an ERA under 4 and he's averaged a 100 ERA+. He has a career FIP of nearly 4. A career WHIP of over 1.4. Why is that valuable? Yeah, he can go on dominant runs. But so could Bryan Baker.  That's worth clogging up a spot and not getting somebody more consistent and...well...better?
    • Taking a look at 2023 vs 2024 FANGRAPHS WAR, some interesting directional info.  (Acknowledging that WAR is not definitivve,  FG uses FIPERA for Pitcher WAR).  This is meant to highlight areas of opportunity not a deep dive on data.  Highlighted 5 key areas:   1) TOR/Ace role /Burns FA.  All other roles 2-6 are likely fine.  Bradish coming back in 2nd half of 2025 would be a boost but should not be counted on.   Going into 2025 w/o sourcing a 4 WAR type of replacement for Burns would be a huge miss.    Most important decision/move for 2025.  2) Need to solidify closer and BP which is hopefully Felix coming back strong but should not depend on 2023 dominance.  Need a deep pen with reliable depth in minors and assume more trade deadline reinforcements.   Plenty of good options here, spend $ smartly but don't depend solely on waiver claims.  3) Adley - none of Elias' 2024 calculus included AR's huge 2nd half dropoff.    If he does not come back strong, may have to re-think AR contribution and make up for any defecit in other positions.  If Gunnar is a 10 and Adley's a 4 WAR we are more than fine, should not assume Adley is a 5+WAR player.  4) Santander - How is he best replaced.  Elevate Heston and pair him with a RH platoon partner who can back-up all three OF postions.  Not an easy find but needs to be impactful - a RH bat, preferably a high OBP type- that player does not exist in the org in terms of 2025 readiness.     Supposedly that's why Mayo is so highly valued as a RH  bat which is why not developing him as an OFer is curious.  5) Jackson Holliday - Biggest upside story for 2025.  Expect to see major improvement and the type of bat the lineup needs.  Should be settled in, got to experience the post season without playing but a lot of the Elias' plan/process is JH becoming a very good player.   
    • I don't get the idea of not wanting Soto back. First of all, lets talk about money.  He probably gets around $6M in arb for 2025. 37 relievers made 6M or more in 2024. 56 made 4M or more.  A 1/6 deal for him isnt bad and its not a long term commitment, which is a huge plus. After his 2 awful outings after he got here, Soto appeared in 20 games. He threw 16.1 innings and had a 1.10 ERA. He gave up 1 homer, walked 4, 11 hits and struck out 20.  For the season, his ERA was a mediocre 4.42 but his FIP was 3.68, his K rate was over 11 and his HR rate was .68. The issue is the walks. He is still only 29 years old, has over 60 appearances each of the last 4 years (ie he's durable) and he has very good seasons in the past. Even last year, when his ERA was 4.62, his xERA was 2.79 and his FIP was 3.59. With his ability to get Ks and miss bats and the upside he has, taking the chance on him for 1/6 is a risk you would be foolish not to take.
    • Haha. Our reliever with the lowest FIP & WHIP and highest K/BB rate.
    • Akin is discussed above. Pretty sure he is out of options as of this year. But I am far from a roster nerd.  Cano and Felix do have options but they are not the type of guys you would option assuming they are performing at a high level, only if they struggle. We are not going to want to option them just to get through a bullpen day or manage rest. 
    • It's a tough question. Akin stunk/hurt in 2023, this year he was very good in medium/low leverage situations. Suarez is a starter *and* was effective in relief. I don't know, think I'd rather have Suarez, tbh.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...