Jump to content

O's acquire Steve Pearce for Jonah Heim


McLovin

Recommended Posts

I think this is an excellent move. Pearce is more than a bench bat. I suspect he will end up playing more often than not, pushing Trumbo to DH on some days and costing Kim playing time as well. He's a better defender than both, also.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 230
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Anyone know how I can get Steve Pearce's combined stats for the last four years? The stat sites at orioles.com/mlb, baseball-reference, and ESPN give year by year, so to get the last four combined I'd have to work it all out on paper with a calculator.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone know how I can get Steve Pearce's combined stats for the last four years? The stat sites at orioles.com/mlb, baseball-reference, and ESPN give year by year, so to get the last four combined I'd have to work it all out on paper with a calculator.

I cropped it on baseballreference.com:

STEVE PEARCE: 2013-2016

50 HR

131 RBI

57 Doubles

2 Triples

133 Runs Scored

7 Stolen Bases

4 Caught Stealing

955 At Bats

1,078 Plate Appearances

.269 BA

.350 OBP

.840 OPS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then your bench is Caleb, Flash, and Pearce. No one can cover CF. It's really a 12 man staff plus Ubaldo. Hire some guys to rough him up in a dark alley, enough that he has to go on the DL

That actually is the best idea I have heard yet! Accidents happen all the time...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I cropped it on baseballreference.com:

STEVE PEARCE: 2013-2016

50 HR

131 RBI

57 Doubles

2 Triples

133 Runs Scored

7 Stolen Bases

4 Caught Stealing

955 At Bats

1,078 Plate Appearances

.269 BA

.350 OBP

.840 OPS

Hard to believe he's not a starter, considering he's also good defensively.

How do you get baseball-reference to compile the stats for these years?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hard to believe he's not a starter, considering he's also good defensively.

How do you get baseball-reference to compile the stats for these years?

You click on the years that you want to crop.

For example, if you want Frank Robinson's combined number for the 10 years that he played with the Reds, you would click on his 1956 statistics, then click on his 1965 statistics, and then wait a few seconds for baseball reference to load the combined numbers for you.

Follow the same steps for Robinson's 1966 and 1971 seasons if you want his combined statistics for the 6 seasons in which he played for the Orioles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just want to reiterate that a 13-man pitching staff is stupid. They played a 12 inning game yesterday and the starter went 5 and two-thirds and the Orioles still had 3 relievers they didn't use.

I am on team 4-man bench.

Agree, especially since we got Miley who is less likely than some of the guys we have been pitching to have a super short outing (Ubaldo and Wright due to lack of talent, Bundy due to pitch count limitations, and both Bundy and Worley not being fully stretched out after being relievers all year).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We were getting Fowler. With Fowler, Kim , Jones, Trumbo and

Rickard there was really no place for Pearce.

Pearce signed with the Rays Jan. 28, almost a month before the Orioles' agreement (and subsequent non-agreement) with Fowler. Fowler isn't the reason the O's didn't pursue Pearce.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pearce signed with the Rays Jan. 28, almost a month before the Orioles' agreement (and subsequent non-agreement) with Fowler. Fowler isn't the reason the O's didn't pursue Pearce.

Pearce would have been a perfect platoon partner with Kim. He also would have been a great insurance policy in case Kim didn't work out. As an added bonus, there would have been no need for Nolan Reimold to be on the 25 man roster. The Orioles really mismanaged their roster in the off-season when you consider the tendering of Matusz, only signing one starting pitcher after losing your best starting pitcher to another team, not signing another left-handed bullpen arm, not re-signing Pearce, etc....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've got a feeling the Rays are ultimately going to be happy with this trade. It sounded like it was between us, the Indians and the Mets going after Pearce, with the Mets falling out after they grabbed Bruce, and the Indians losing interest after getting Guyer. At that point, they were actually lucky to get anything for Pearce, and he'd probably still be a Ray had it not been for the fact that the GM that acquired Pearce three different times in the past(four now) was looking for a bat.

Regardless, I think people are a little too dismissive of the bump in Heim's stats this year. There actually was one. For a guy that was labeled a glove-only catcher, there was a pretty pronounced jump in his power and walk rate this year. That gets a little washed away statistically when you look at his terrible batting average, but I think some of that can be attributed to his pretty unlucky .241 BABIP and the fact that he was trying to(and succeeding) in expanding on the sort of hitter he was. The guy's walk to strikeout rate was 33 to 51, which is precisely what you want to see out of guys like that, guys not striking out at too gaudy of a clip and drawing a fair amount of walks. And that came with the sudden appearance of double-digit power, which was something scouts seemed to talk about, but never actually existed in reality. The guy's still an incredibly long way away, but I think the Rays were pretty savvy getting Heim. He's only 21, and I think there's a lot more meat on the bones there than I think anybody is really acknowledging. I liked him as a prospect and was kinda sad to see him go. I wasn't going to sell the farm over the guy, but I think he was a legitimately interesting prospect.

HOWEVER. The guy is still potentially the third or fourth catcher on our minor league prospect depth chart, and we managed to pick up a proven impact player that led a playoff team in WAR two years ago. That isn't supposed to happen, you aren't supposed to be able to nonchalantly trade away your easily forgotten surplus for guys that have done that. Over the past four years, Pearce has put up an OPS of .840 and averages 28 home runs per 162 games played. This includes that down year and the first year he was here. Baseball reference has him at a 5.5 WAR per 650 plate appearances during that span, which is just stupidly productive. This might be an uncomfortable truth, but this is higher than Chris Davis during that span; a span that included two 50 home run seasons.

This might all amount to nothing. Heim's peripheral statistical improvements might not ultimately mean anything, and Pearce may get injured again(something he's prone to) or fall into a slump like the brutal one he had in April/May of last season. But there's real, honest upside here and we didn't need to give away anything especially noteworthy to get it, during the time of year when you ALWAYS need to give up something noteworthy to get something noteworthy. Would have been nice getting a more impressive starting pitcher, but we needed a bat to wake up this offense, and we got about as good of a deal as you can get.

I hope I'm preaching to the choir here. Steve Pearce rocks and is easily one of the most underrated players in baseball. If you're an Oriole fan and don't already know this, I have genuine pity for you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pearce has 1 HR and 2 RBI over his last month

He is streaky and often injured

For all the talk of where Heim is on the depth chart, I keep hearing that he is the only guy

with the defensive chops to be guaranteed to be able to stay at C in the majors

I do not like the trade

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pearce has 1 HR and 2 RBI over his last month

He is streaky and often injured

For all the talk of where Heim is on the depth chart, I keep hearing that he is the only guy

with the defensive chops to be guaranteed to be able to stay at C in the majors

I do not like the trade

And when Jonah hits homers from both sides of the plate in one game, we will hear about it here....;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • If they were going to get rid of Fuller they should have done it a month and a half ago. The issues with our hitting were apparent the whole second half of the season. Maybe a firing or two would have sent a message to the players prior to their postseason fizzle. . 
    • What does Eflin and Jimenez signify? It was a very small addition to the payroll. John Angelos would have approved that, if he needed to approve anything at all.
    • I'm not sure that's quite it.  Well, more importantly, I'm not sure that's quite it for me. I absolutely want to win more in the playoffs.  At this point there's no question that for me I'd live through some lousy seasons if it guaranteed a World Series trophy.  I'd give up a lot for that. But unfortunately it's the weird paradox, especially in baseball, where the games that mean so much in terms of perception actually mean very little.   Just look at some the threads posted on this board in recent weeks. "Do the Orioles need more experience"?  (studies have shown this is not the case) "Maybe they need a certain type of hitter/approach!" (no, studies have shown that's not it either) "They must need to build their bullpen a certain way." (nope) "Well you have to be playing well in September to have a chance in October!"  (very much not true) "It must be those nice white boys need somebody to be a jerk" (OK, no real way to quantify that one :)) The Astros must have the secret sauce, they went to the ALCS a lot of times in a row!  Oh, they lost in the 1st round this year. Study after study after study shows that there is no pattern.  There is no "right" way to do it.  There's no way to predict from year to year which teams will or will not go on the run. If for that crazy 8-9th inning on the day after the season the Mets may not have even made the playoffs.  Now they're the example of guys that can "get it done". It's not an excuse, and frankly it's not really my opinion.  It's reality. I do 100% agree with your last 2 sentences.  I don't know what we've done to so displease the baseball gods.
    • It's definitely a possibility, but I wonder if there is actually something going on between Hyde and some players, would it be smart to bring his potential replacement in and subject him to the problem?    The fans, mostly here are the main source of BB being a manager. He's definitely had some MiL success so it's not unreasonable to assume he will be a manager someday. 
    • I think this is spot on in every way.  But I think the fanbase is somewhat divided on how important playoff success is. Put another way, for you, me, and a lot of folks, the playoffs mean a ton.  41 years with no championship or even a pennant is a real long time, and the narrative of the Orioles since 1983 has gotten extremely old. Even the narrative of this winless recent edition of the Os has gotten old. For other fans, the regular season means much more and winning/losing in the playoffs doesn't carry much weight because of the nature of the tournament.   There is no right or wrong way to be a fan of a team. But I can say that if you told me the next 10 years would involve 9 seasons where we lose 90+ games and 1 season where we win the World Series, I will gladly sign up for that.  I am definitely at that point where that title means everything to me and yes 29 teams go home without the ring each year, but 1 team does get it and that needs to be us. And if we get "lucky" like the Tigers on the path there, then bring it on! If the playoffs are a crapshoot, I am tired of that crapshoot rewarding everyone else.
    • More than once Fredi displayed a lack of control that cost him his job. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...