Jump to content

O's acquire Steve Pearce for Jonah Heim


McLovin

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 230
  • Created
  • Last Reply
He's got a 342 BABIP Tony, I'm not going by his 2016 numbers. I mean I'll include them in the total package but you have to expect him to regress. Just hopefully not to the extent Parra did last year.

He's already been regressing a bit. .563 OPS in his last 13 games, which includes 4 games before he went on the DL in June. But if he can approach his career numbers I'll be fine with that. He figures to play a lot vs. LHP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You pay someone $17 million a year to sit on the bench occasionally until they start hitting. Davis seems like the kind of guy that rises to the challenge eventually after struggling, but he also seems like the kind of guy that might need more of a breather every so often.

Just disagree. I think Chris wants to play every day and I think would not take kindly to sitting at all (similar to Adam, Manny, Schoop...guys that assume they are everyday players now). I think he is someone that has massive slumps and he will be allowed to play through them (given his on base and defensive contributions).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We'll get our LOOGY eventually. Either on the last day or so of August or when rosters expand on Sept. 1st and we can use

Tolliver

Hart

Andy Oliver

Brian Duensing???

Unfortunately with Ubaldo we just don't have the space to carry one right now even if we made a good trade for one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And due to Ondrusek typically being better vs LH, we at least improved in the LOOGY department a bit without actually getting a LOOGY.

Getting Miley also means at least 20% of the games we'll have less need for a LH reliever because we'll have started a lefty.

And if McFarland gets healthy, he will probably be back. Or Donnie Hart who has had three scoreless appearances since being sent back to Bowie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And due to Ondrusek typically being better vs LH, we at least improved in the LOOGY department a bit without actually getting a LOOGY.

Getting Miley also means at least 20% of the games we'll have less need for a LH reliever because we'll have started a lefty.

Very good points

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mixed feelings on this one. I like Pearce, but he's a rental and is only going to play part time. I guess I don't care that much about Heim given the depth we have at catcher in the minors, but I do think he'll be a viable back-up some day. So I'm about neutral on this one.

Would have to agree that "viable backup" is about what Heim's upside looks like at this point. If you take a look around the league, there isn't a starting C or even a very solid backup C who was still nearly this bad a hitter at age 21.

So, what we gave up is a guy whose reasonable projection --- if he stays healthy, if his bat continues to progress, if his defensive skills don't erode --- is that he could be a viable backup C in 3-4 years? If we can't get another one of those into the organization within that time span, we're in much bigger trouble than just missing out on the opportunity to run Jonah Heim out to catch Sunday afternoon games.

In return, we got a guy who has a top 10 WRC+ (147) in all of baseball this season. Of course he's probably going to regress a bit from that, but he's still a good hitter. He crushes lefties (always has), which we need. He can immediately step in and platoon with Kim in LF and/or Alvarez at DH. He gives Buck the ability to spell either Trumbo or Davis down the stretch without feeling like he's losing that much offense. He obviously becomes your first PH option off the bench against any lefty. And he gives you insurance at 5 positions (LF, RF, 1B, DH, and even 2B) in case of an injury.

This one's a no-brainer. I wish teams would give up good players for absolutely zero value in return too. But they don't. In this case, we got a good player, one who can help us in a lot of ways during our stretch run. And what we gave up in return is a guy who's at least 3 years away and will have to make HUGE strides at the plate to ever become much more than an organization's 3rd catcher.

That's a win. A big win. Especially for a team that has an open window right now, a window that will honestly probably be shut well before Heim ever makes his ML debut.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chris wants to play every day and I think would not take kindly to sitting at all .

I don't care what he does or doesn't take kindly to. I didn't take kindly to him being suspended for our 2014 playoff run either. If he's not playing well, at some point, he needs to sit. I think the plus side of getting him hot makes it worth it to play him but i'm not opposed to eventually sitting him or moving him down in the order if Pearce is red hot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And due to Ondrusek typically being better vs LH, we at least improved in the LOOGY department a bit without actually getting a LOOGY.

Getting Miley also means at least 20% of the games we'll have less need for a LH reliever because we'll have started a lefty.

Interesting way to look at Miley. A team could pinch hit a lefty but it forces them to use a bench player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I mean Adley’s attempted hit vs Witt is a good example. Adley hit it harder…but missed for a few feet. That happens. But even softly hit balls find green…the Os aren’t..others are…like Detroit..like KC vs us. They win on an IF hit, Westburg’s ball is a homer in 28 of 30 parks.   
    • If they were going to get rid of Fuller they should have done it a month and a half ago. The issues with our hitting were apparent the whole second half of the season. Maybe a firing or two would have sent a message to the players prior to their postseason fizzle. . 
    • What does Eflin and Jimenez signify? It was a very small addition to the payroll. John Angelos would have approved that, if he needed to approve anything at all.
    • I'm not sure that's quite it.  Well, more importantly, I'm not sure that's quite it for me. I absolutely want to win more in the playoffs.  At this point there's no question that for me I'd live through some lousy seasons if it guaranteed a World Series trophy.  I'd give up a lot for that. But unfortunately it's the weird paradox, especially in baseball, where the games that mean so much in terms of perception actually mean very little.   Just look at some the threads posted on this board in recent weeks. "Do the Orioles need more experience"?  (studies have shown this is not the case) "Maybe they need a certain type of hitter/approach!" (no, studies have shown that's not it either) "They must need to build their bullpen a certain way." (nope) "Well you have to be playing well in September to have a chance in October!"  (very much not true) "It must be those nice white boys need somebody to be a jerk" (OK, no real way to quantify that one :)) The Astros must have the secret sauce, they went to the ALCS a lot of times in a row!  Oh, they lost in the 1st round this year. Study after study after study shows that there is no pattern.  There is no "right" way to do it.  There's no way to predict from year to year which teams will or will not go on the run. If for that crazy 8-9th inning on the day after the season the Mets may not have even made the playoffs.  Now they're the example of guys that can "get it done". It's not an excuse, and frankly it's not really my opinion.  It's reality. I do 100% agree with your last 2 sentences.  I don't know what we've done to so displease the baseball gods.
    • It's definitely a possibility, but I wonder if there is actually something going on between Hyde and some players, would it be smart to bring his potential replacement in and subject him to the problem?    The fans, mostly here are the main source of BB being a manager. He's definitely had some MiL success so it's not unreasonable to assume he will be a manager someday. 
    • I think this is spot on in every way.  But I think the fanbase is somewhat divided on how important playoff success is. Put another way, for you, me, and a lot of folks, the playoffs mean a ton.  41 years with no championship or even a pennant is a real long time, and the narrative of the Orioles since 1983 has gotten extremely old. Even the narrative of this winless recent edition of the Os has gotten old. For other fans, the regular season means much more and winning/losing in the playoffs doesn't carry much weight because of the nature of the tournament.   There is no right or wrong way to be a fan of a team. But I can say that if you told me the next 10 years would involve 9 seasons where we lose 90+ games and 1 season where we win the World Series, I will gladly sign up for that.  I am definitely at that point where that title means everything to me and yes 29 teams go home without the ring each year, but 1 team does get it and that needs to be us. And if we get "lucky" like the Tigers on the path there, then bring it on! If the playoffs are a crapshoot, I am tired of that crapshoot rewarding everyone else.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...