Jump to content

Luis Terrero


Frobby

Recommended Posts

As I posted on the main board, I think it is time to consider bringing Luis Terrero up to the majors. Currently he sits at .339/.415/.532. He ranks 4th in the International League in BA and OBP, 11th in SLG, 7th in OPS, 5th in RBI.

While at our AAA affiliate Ottawa in 2006, Terrero hit .318/.367/.560. Last year he played a decent amount for the White Sox (117 AB), posting a .231/.348/.376 mark. Not great, but the BA is about the same as what Payton's is now, and thr OBP and SLG are considerably higher.

At age 28, it's time to see what he can do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 37
  • Created
  • Last Reply
As I posted on the main board, I think it is time to consider bringing Luis Terrero up to the majors. Currently he sits at .339/.415/.532. He ranks 4th in the International League in BA and OBP, 11th in SLG, 7th in OPS, 5th in RBI.

While at our AAA affiliate Ottawa in 2006, Terrero hit .318/.367/.560. Last year he played a decent amount for the White Sox (117 AB), posting a .231/.348/.376 mark. Not great, but the BA is about the same as what Payton's is now, and thr OBP and SLG are considerably higher.

At age 28, it's time to see what he can do.

I really don't know how the O's get him playing time. Anytime the O's take away from Payton is going to blow up in the teams face in attutude problems. I don't see the O's eating a bunch of salary to get rid of Payton. Unfortunately, I think this is a move that does not happen until late July unless there is an injury.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As Jon Wilt noted in another thread, Terrero is Payton at a tiny fraction of the cost. It's nice to have a guy like this in the system, available to replace an injured OF or to replace Payton when (hopefully) he gets dealt. Barring that, Terrero would serve no purpose on the team and would get zero playing time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really don't know how the O's get him playing time. Anytime the O's take away from Payton is going to blow up in the teams face in attutude problems. I don't see the O's eating a bunch of salary to get rid of Payton. Unfortunately, I think this is a move that does not happen until late July unless there is an injury.

Just release Payton. It's less than 2 million at this point. I think it's worth it to find out if Terrero is worth anything. Just find a way to get him into the game 3-4 times a week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Terrero in a worst case scenario is basically a cheaper Payton with more power, a better arm, and perhaps a lower BA. Overall a more useful 4th OF I think, and given his tremendous minor league success there's always a chance he could finally figure it out and be even better. Payton is only going to get worse, and he wasn't that good to begin with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Terrero in a worst case scenario is basically a cheaper Payton with more power, a better arm, and perhaps a lower BA. Overall a more useful 4th OF I think, and given his tremendous minor league success there's always a chance he could finally figure it out and be even better. Payton is only going to get worse, and he wasn't that good to begin with.
If Terrero is added to the team now in connection with Payton getting cut, as many are suggesting (I'm assuming, perhaps erroneously, that you are among them, Jenius), then in aggregate dollars we've wound up with a MORE expensive Payton. This way, we're paying the full balance of Payton's contract (which would NOT necessarily be the case if we have the patience to wait for an OF injury striking a contender, so that Payton can be dealt) plus Terrero's minimum-salary big-league contract.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Terrero is added to the team now in connection with Payton getting cut, as many are suggesting (I'm assuming, perhaps erroneously, that you are among them, Jenius), then in aggregate dollars we've wound up with a MORE expensive Payton. This way, we're paying the full balance of Payton's contract (which would NOT necessarily be the case if we have the patience to wait for an OF injury striking a contender, so that Payton can be dealt) plus Terrero's minimum-salary big-league contract.
For this year, sure, but you also get the opportunity to find out if you have a cheaper Payton on hand for 2009+ or if you need to get a decent backup OF through trade, FA, or whatever means for the future.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For this year, sure, but you also get the opportunity to find out if you have a cheaper Payton on hand for 2009+ or if you need to get a decent backup OF through trade, FA, or whatever means for the future.
If Payton is traded, say, in July (and who knows? maybe it could be June or late May if an opportunity arises) -- then there's still enough time during the rest of the year to give Terrero a reasonable audition. But either way, I would contend that the dollars we might potentially recover on Payton's contract are more valuable than the slight incremental knowledge we'd gain about Terrero. Even if he performs exceedingly well during an audition this year, I don't think any of us could confidently predict that he would be able to repeat the performance next year. It just bumps the odds up a little bit (which is fine, but not in any way close to conclusive).
Link to comment
Share on other sites

i started this thread on the majol league board also, i too believe he needs to get another shot with the big club. After today he is 4-5 and raied his average to .360
Assuming Terrero himself doesn't get injured at the wrong time, he will almost certainly get that shot. All it will take is either a trade of Payton, a 3-day injury to Jones or Payton, or a one-week injury to Scott or Markakis (something along those lines). Hard to believe that at least one of those things will not occur sometime this year.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just release Payton. It's less than 2 million at this point. I think it's worth it to find out if Terrero is worth anything. Just find a way to get him into the game 3-4 times a week.

I think your math is a little off. The O's are about 21% into the season. That means they have 79% to go yet. 79% times $5M equals $3.95M still on Payton's contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really don't know how the O's get him playing time. Anytime the O's take away from Payton is going to blow up in the teams face in attutude problems.

I think you're right, and who the helle cares?. Bring up Terrero and play him.Tell me who has done so super that the team can't afford to let them sit down. . Who cares if Kevin Millar is miffed? Get rid of him, too. Same for the rest of that dead-assed lineup.Get Salazar up here and give him his shot.The Orioles w/have been shut out in Kansas City tonight if Markakis hadn't played. You simply have to make some changes. This team is not going to get better w/o them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Terrero is added to the team now in connection with Payton getting cut, as many are suggesting (I'm assuming, perhaps erroneously, that you are among them, Jenius), then in aggregate dollars we've wound up with a MORE expensive Payton. This way, we're paying the full balance of Payton's contract (which would NOT necessarily be the case if we have the patience to wait for an OF injury striking a contender, so that Payton can be dealt) plus Terrero's minimum-salary big-league contract.

I'm just skeptical that Payton has any trade value at all, even if some other team suffers and injury. I think all you'd get for him is some 27-year old AA player, or maybe two players of that type. About what we got for Rodrigo Lopez or Javy Lopez, in other words. Is it worth it for us to deny AB to a player who might be better than Payton so that we can hope to engineer a trade like that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm just skeptical that Payton has any trade value at all, even if some other team suffers and injury. I think all you'd get for him is some 27-year old AA player, or maybe two players of that type. About what we got for Rodrigo Lopez or Javy Lopez, in other words. Is it worth it for us to deny AB to a player who might be better than Payton so that we can hope to engineer a trade like that?
The purpose of a Payton trade, at least in my view, would be to recover useful dollars (out of the remaining $3.9 million on Jay's contract), not useless players. Even if it makes us a couple of games better this season to have Terrero on the team and Redman as the first injury call-up rather than Payton on the team and Terrero as the first call-up (which is not entirely clear-cut), it hurts us for the future to forfeit dollars that could be used for incremental increases to our budgets for scouting, draftee signing bonuses, facilities improvement, and/or player development.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Maybe Hall would be better off if we had done that.  He sure seemed to make a lot more progress as a reliever than he did the last 2-3 years in the minors.   I’m all for seeing what McDermott can do in the bullpen.   Still doesn’t mean I wouldn’t be interested in adding Brecht as well.   That’s not saying he’d even be ready to contribute this year but maybe. I think Sale, Crochet, and others prove that you can fast track as a reliever and still go back to starting.   Anyway, I think I’ll just leave it at agree to disagree.  I’m looking for elite talent at #22 even if the guy profiles as a reliever.   I’ll take that over a Billy Amick type.
    • Everything about Adley's throwing has taken a hit this year.  His pop time used to be top tier and he's degraded to around league average.  That's on top of his propensity to throw the ball to Narnia.   Some of the throwing issues I'd excuse because no one is throwing runners out at a good clip anymore (the base size and pickoff rules really made meaningful changes there) but he's not really a plus guy with the run game anymore.  He's still elite at blocking the plate and framing so that's good.   Wieters had a pretty steep drop-off through his mid-20s defensively as well.  It's hard to be Ivan Rodriguez and be an elite thrower from the backstop for like 15 years straight. 
    • Watching this kid at OK State kinda hurts. Starting shortstop for a top 10 program as a Freshman. He’s gives off some toolsy vibes.
    • Self edit - I was filtered on contract value not aav. There’s 5 or 6 relievers in the top 50 aav per year. But that’s still nothing, since it shows even back end #2 starters make more than all but the elite closers.  as far as Brecht, I’d have him going up the minors as a starter just like baumeister  I want our minor leagues and FO looking to maximize long term value of our pipeline. If we need a closer or setup man for this year, I’d rather deal norby or someone to acquire it. hell, we kind of already have Brecht at home  his name is chayce McDermott. I’d rather bring him up down the stretch this year than start a first round picks clock and waste a chance to develop him as a starter. If we valued immediate bullpen help over developing starters, hall would’ve been a full time reliever 2 years ago rather than toiling away in Norfolk trying to get him command sorted.   
    • Of course Holliday as well. Anyways Mayo, Basallo no. As for Kjerstad?, depends on how Stowers does with his chance and what their going to with Mountcastle and to a lesser extent O'Hearn.
    • If I get Brecht I’m getting him in the ML bullpen ASAP and pulling the Chris Sale/Garrett Crochet move later on if it’s warranted.
    • Only thing that runs Mateo of 2B is injury or Holliday.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...