Jump to content

Do We Sell?


Bahama O's Fan

Recommended Posts

On 6/11/2017 at 11:59 AM, RZNJ said:

Britton,  if healthy,  to the Nationals, for Victor Robles, top ten pitching prospect, and bullpen arm like Koda Glover.

Machado to Cubs for Addison Russell,  Candelario, etc.

I like both of these ideas. The Nats deal seems perfect, considering their desire for a stud closer. We just need Britton to come back before they trade for someone else. 

I also think Manny to the Mets for a package based around Rosario might have some potential...

Also, any possibilities with the Brewers? Their minor league system is LOADED. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 120
  • Created
  • Last Reply
23 minutes ago, birdwatcher55 said:

 if Duquette was in charge of a rebuild. It would be catastrophic.

Do you have any proof of this?

Arguing that Duquette wouldn't want to rebuild is somewhat legitimate.

Saying he couldn't do it if tasked with it has no basis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK if below .500 at the trade deadline sell, I really think this current crew had it's high water mark, and I don't see how they can fix the starting pitching mess other then by some miracle they all pick it back up.

and what I think is worthless unless we're out of all possible playoff contention the O's won't sell anybody.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Machado is really the only truly valuable piece.  Davis isn't going anywhere, and I'd keep Trumbo since he's a proven bat that can help them transition through this "reloading period" so to speak.  Might be able to get something halfway decent for Seth Smith from a playoff contender (maybe a marginal A or AA prospect).  I doubt Kim brings much.  I'm not trading Jones, Schoop, Mancini, Davis, Trumbo, Castillo, or any of the pitchers.  Britton I would consider, but obviously that would have to wait until the offseason and him to show in the 2nd half that he's healthy.  You can't move him in July.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Peter Angelos will be 87 in a few weeks. Here's what I am guessing he believes:

  • This team has a few very good players who should be able to contribute a lot in the next 2-3 years. To build a winner during that short term, I have agreed to pay some of those players a lot of money (too much money, in a few cases).
  • We've hit a rough patch. Some of that has to do with injuries, and some of it is just the way things ebb and flow during a season. But we are still in it, and when our offense heats up and we get Britton back we should be right there, competing for a WC spot if not the division. We have a great manager, and he'll find a way to get us there.
  • To keep the ML payroll as high as it is, I have not made the kind of investment in a Latin America program that others have made. I'm not sure how much building that infrastructure would cost, how long it would take to produce ML talent, or how successful we would be as latecomers.
  • We have some very good prospects who may be able help very soon. (Look at Mancini. Nobody thought he could be as productive as he's been. That's why we signed Trumbo.)

How do you sell that almost-87 year old guy on a rebuilding process that pretty much ensures an inability to compete with the RS, NYYs and BJs, and thus a fourth- or fifth-place finish, for the next three to ten years? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As long as PA is alive, lucid and in possession of decision-making power over the Orioles, I don't believe another rebuild will ever take place.  IMO it's far more likely that Duquette willl play out the string and move on, Showalter will decide if he's had enough sometime in 2018, and the core of the team as it currently stands will remain intact for the foreseeable future.  Manny will be gone for pennies on the dollar and the team will sink into mediocrity for an extended period.  

If it were up to me, I would be selling at the AS break if the team continues to look like it has over the last month or so, Pittsburgh games notwithstanding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, esmd said:

Britton I would consider, but obviously that would have to wait until the offseason and him to show in the 2nd half that he's healthy.  You can't move him in July.

I wouldn't be too sure of that.   It depends how soon he gets back and how he performs once he returns.     He's scheduled to begin a rehab assignment on June  19, so I'd assume he's scheduled to be back in early July.    That's enough time for teams to see what he's got.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I could see a piece or two moving at the deadline if this collapse continues but not some wholesale dismantling. That type of thing should probably wait until the offseason anyway since it should probably involve hiring a new GM or maybe moving Buck in there. Not the type of thing they can do before the trade deadline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We're wasting a 163 million payroll.  

Ubaldo- 13.5 

Kim- 4.2

Nuno- 1.2

Flaherty- 1.8

That's 20.7 million right there for players not contributing at all.  Then you have 

Hardy- 14 

O'day- 7

Tillman- 10

Britton- 11.4

That's another 42 million for players that are hurt or just done.  

So we have 60 million in players that are giving us nothing or negative value.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

We're wasting a 163 million payroll.  

Ubaldo- 13.5 

Kim- 4.2

Nuno- 1.2

Flaherty- 1.8

That's 20.7 million right there for players not contributing at all.  Then you have 

Hardy- 14 

O'day- 7

Tillman- 10

Britton- 11.4

That's another 42 million for players that are hurt or just done.  

So we have 60 million in players that are giving us nothing or negative value.  

 

The O's should have just known that Tillman and Britton were going to get hurt?

I'm not sure what point you're trying to make.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, eddie83 said:

Are those teams trading those players? He turns 25 in July, he is younger than Judge.  

I wasn't suggesting the O's actually try and trade Manny for Lindor, Seager or Correa.  Not that Cleveland, Houston or LA would be dumb enough to  do that trade anyway.  As far as a trade is concerned, Manny's age isn't really important unless he's traded to a team that thinks it can re-sign him.  But those might be the only teams that might give up anything of value for a "superstar" who is having a down year.  Why would a team that would never have a shot at re-signing Manny give up of anything of value for him the way he's currently hitting?  Teams that could use him now but could never afford to re-sign him  -- like the Brewers, Indians, Twins and maybe the Rockies and DBacks -- couldn't be justified in giving up much for him the way he's currently hitting.  If he was hitting like he hit the past two years they'd be all over him.  If the O's traded him now they'd might get the best deals from the Red Sox or Yankees -- the horror!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, birdwatcher55 said:

 if Duquette was in charge of a rebuild. It would be catastrophic.

Duquette was the force behind the initial part of the Red Sox rebuild.  I agree Duquette has his flaws but the trades he made as O's GM are nothing like a GM would make during a rebuild. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. Gausman

2. Bundy

3. Tillman?

4. Wright/Asher?

5. ?

RP:  Wright?

RP:  Verrett?

RP:  Asher?

RP:  Givens

RP:  O'Day

SU:  Brach

Closer:  Britton

C: Castillo

1B:  Davis

2B:  Schoop

SS:  Ruben Tejada

3B:  Todd Frazier/Mike Moustakas?

LF:  Rickard

CF:  Jones

RF:  Mancini

DH:  Trumbo

Bench 1:  Joseph

Bench 2: 

Bench 3: 

Bench 4: 

Looking at rough projections for next season, assuming we hold onto Britton, we're going to need to use Machado to replentish the organization.  They need a 4 or 5 prospect deal, IMO, with at least two of those prospects being starting pitchers.  It's a lot easier to find relievers, and some of the young pitchers in the organization that have faltered as starters (i.e. Mike Wright, Asher) might find success in the 'pen.  If they can sign a guy like Moustakas or Frazier to play 3B and a LH OFer to platoon with Rickard, the lineup is pretty set.  I think Tejada is probably your everyday SS next year.  I'd bring Tillman back on a 1 year deal if they can get him cheap.  Then they just need to fill out the bench.  The rotation, as always, is the question.  They absolutely must get at least 2 top SP prospects as a part of the Machado deal.  We all know they're not going to sign a FA SP for multiple years, not after Ubaldo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, esmd said:

1. Gausman

2. Bundy

3. Tillman?

4. Wright/Asher?

5. ?

RP:  Wright?

RP:  Verrett?

RP:  Asher?

RP:  Givens

RP:  O'Day

SU:  Brach

Closer:  Britton

C: Castillo

1B:  Davis

2B:  Schoop

SS:  Ruben Tejada

3B:  Todd Frazier/Mike Moustakas?

LF:  Rickard

CF:  Jones

RF:  Mancini

DH:  Trumbo

Bench 1:  Joseph

Bench 2: 

Bench 3: 

Bench 4: 

Looking at rough projections for next season, assuming we hold onto Britton, we're going to need to use Machado to replentish the organization.  They need a 4 or 5 prospect deal, IMO, with at least two of those prospects being starting pitchers.  It's a lot easier to find relievers, and some of the young pitchers in the organization that have faltered as starters (i.e. Mike Wright, Asher) might find success in the 'pen.  If they can sign a guy like Moustakas or Frazier to play 3B and a LH OFer to platoon with Rickard, the lineup is pretty set.  I think Tejada is probably your everyday SS next year.  I'd bring Tillman back on a 1 year deal if they can get him cheap.  Then they just need to fill out the bench.  The rotation, as always, is the question.  They absolutely must get at least 2 top SP prospects as a part of the Machado deal.  We all know they're not going to sign a FA SP for multiple years, not after Ubaldo.

Interesting...

Mancini doesn't have the arm to play RF, neither does Rickard

Jones is a  bad CF'er

Need to sign a CF'er and move Jones to RF, Mancini in LF

Doesn't make sense to waste more money on past prime players like Frazier or Moustakis... no way they would sign with the O's anyhow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, FlipTheBird said:

The O's should have just known that Tillman and Britton were going to get hurt?

I'm not sure what point you're trying to make.

Many people believe that Britton should've been traded during the offseason when his value was in the stratosphere. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Cell service restored, power back on, not a single shingle missing from the roof. 
    • They need players who are better than some they have
    • Probably neither - it may be more a function of lining up with players.  The Astros extensions aren’t really comparable. The first Altuve extension was ridiculously team friendly. Altuve had less than $1MM in career earnings ($15K signing bonus as amateur). He had a good 2012, making the all-star team. However, he struggled in the first half of 2013 with an OPS in the six hundreds.  He fired Boras in May, presumably because he wanted to sign an extension that Boras would have been vehemently opposed to.  The deal announced in July bought out his four remaining years of team control for $12.5MM and gave the Astros control over what would have been his first two FA years via club options that totaled $25MM. The second Altuve extension occurred after he rehired Boras and was basically about buying out his grossly undervalued club option years.  It was needed to reverse the mistake of the first extension. The Bregman extension was reached in ARB-3 negotiations. Neither of these situations are at all comparable to a potential Gunnar extension this offseason. First of all, Boras had NEVER extended a pre-arb player with seven figures in career earnings (Carlos Gonzalez was below that threshold).  He is philosophically opposed to it. Second, there are two potential comps that would starting points for a deal: Tatis Jr and Witt Jr.  Boras would reject either of those deals; he would want to do better given his distaste for pre-arb extensions, his strong preference for “record-breaking” deals, and the fact the Gunnar has more career WAR (at least fWAR) than either of those players when they signed their extensions.  When teams are successful in getting a lot of early extensions done, it’s often a case of having a lot of players amenable to an extension. That generally covers attributes such as not signing a large draft or IFA bonus (i.e., relatively “poor” players), players with geographic ties to the team (big part of Atlanta’s success), not having Boras as their agent, and being more risk-adverse from a financial perspective.  The team’s risk tolerance also plays a role as you can get burned if they turn into Grady Sizemore.
    • I think the main reason they’re not big contributors for the Tigers right now is that they were all jettisoned from the team right around the time the Tigers got good. Canha was traded to SFG at the deadline, Urshela was DFA’d on August 15, and Baez shuffled off to season-ending hip surgery on August 22. They were 62-66 when Baez was shut down — they’re 28-11 since.
    • Their rebuild has not been better but their players don't melt under pressure.
    • I miss the "Throwin' Swannanoan".......  
    • So what do the Rays do?   Spend a lot of money fixing the roof for the few remaining years that ballpark has left?   Or do like the A's and play in a minor league facility until their new ballpark is built? I wonder if they could work out something with the Yankees to play in Steinbrenner Field.   It is in Tampa and one of the nicer spring training facilities on the Gulf Coast.   The Rays train in Port Charlotte which is (50???) miles south and I don't think the facility is nearly as good.   Steinbrenner FIeld seats over 10K, has luxury boxes, and a very accessible location for Tampa area fans.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...