Jump to content

Is Gausman a bust?


JohnD

Recommended Posts

Former number four overall pick.  Got to the majors and has stuck around, but it's tough to say he has met expectations.  That doesn't necessarily make him a bust. There are shades of gray between the two poles there.

But outside of half a season or so it seems he's done by the fourth or fifth innings.  He'd be in the bullpen by now if this team had even adequate starters, much less mediocre or good ones.

so with those outcomes versus his draft position does he quantity as a bust?  Not necessarily among the biggest busts ever or anything, but somewhere on the list of guys who didn't pan out?

or is it even too early to say still?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 38
  • Created
  • Last Reply

No, he's not.  

He's had three effective seasons and one lousy one.  

Someone more in tuned to numbers than me will bring up the fact that's he's already produced more WAR than your average no. 4 pick ever does.  

Disappointment and bust are different things. Brian Matusz was a bust.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, LookitsPuck said:

No.

He will either turn it around and/or have a turn around season in 2018.

Or he will end up like every Orioles starting pitching prospect. Breaking out with somebody else or an elite bullpen arm.

Here we go with this breaking out talk. Jake Arrieta is one pitcher. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, thatbearflies said:

"Just some bad luck." 

Maybe I am just sick of watching this team and part of what he said is valid but come on. Hope his confidence shows up in the results column in the second half. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, eddie83 said:

Maybe I am just sick of watching this team and part of what he said is valid but come on. Hope his confidence shows up in the results column in the second half. 

I shared your reaction, to be honest. I didn't feel like he owned his performance enough. I was expecting the usual, "what went wrong?" "Fastball command." But when he said, "just some bad luck," and "I wouldn't take back a single pitch." Even if you executed the pitches in the spots that you wanted them, you don't think some of the pitch choices were poor? I understand that you can't allow yourself to be consumed and dragged down by a poor performance, but if you just shrug this off (at least publicly) my concern is that you are not going to learn. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, thatbearflies said:

I shared your reaction, to be honest. I didn't feel like he owned his performance enough. I was expecting the usual, "what went wrong?" "Fastball command." But when he said, "just some bad luck," and "I wouldn't take back a single pitch." Even if you executed the pitches in the spots that you wanted them, you don't think some of the pitch choices were poor? I understand that you can't allow yourself to be consumed and dragged down by a poor performance, but if you just shrug this off (at least publicly) my concern is that you are not going to learn. 

So 100 pitches for  12 outs is good?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • A few of them are comparable. I rather have Kirby, Singer, Ober, or a healthy Rodon, as my number 3 over Kremer.  I don't have a problem with Kremer as my number four, but i'd like another pitcher who can regularly shut down an offense in the top 3.  I also look at the FA deadline as perhaps the best opportunity to add a guy who can replace some of Burnes production when he likely he leaves after the season.  I would be floating Kjerstad for a pitcher like that. 
    • I don't consider Gil their ace.  He is a rookie with decent stuff but I think he massively regresses before the end of the year.  I do not expect him to get a playoff start ahead of Cole, Stroman, Cortes or even Rodon by the end of the year.  To say they are all better than the Orioles top three is insane to me.  Burnes is better than every pitcher on that list with the possible exception of a healthy Cole which he may not be all of this year.  His situation feels similar to Bradish to me.  Rodriguez is better than all but a handful of the guys on that list.  I think we have 2 of the top 7-10 pitcher in the AL but you think we have a worse rotation than any of the likely AL playoff teams.  That is crazy talk to me.
    • Right.  That’s the problem and why they keep going to Cano.  We were thin before we lost Coulombe.
    • Eddie and Cal were not as athletic. Gunnar’s athletecism is why I compare him to Alomar and Brady. 
    • Kimbrel lol. I mean it's pretty thin back there, they have to add another arm at least.
    • Who do you trust over Cano in the 7th and 8th?
    • I don't think this is an all-in year.  A lot can happen in a year.  This time last year, if someone on the board posted that in the upcoming offseason that we'd get Burnes for Joey Ortiz and DL Hall, they'd have been laughed out of the room.   So many things can happen in a year that people have no way of predicting or forecasting.  No one saw Ryan O'Hearn becoming one of our best hitters.  No one saw the leap Gunnar was going to make from last year to this year.  No one saw the player Westburg is becoming.   Yeah, we could lose Burnes and Santander but we could also gain your guy Coby Mayo and someone else through a trade.  Remember, Corbin Burnes wasn't on our radar at all last year. We've got a great, great core group of young players with more on the way.  We're set up for the next 5-10 years, easy.   If this were an aging, veteran team with a bunch of 30 somethings like the '96 and '97 teams, I'd agree.  Push all the chips to the middle of the table.  But this isn't that. I get that we're finally good, everyone's excited, everyone want to see this team win a World Series now, this year, because it's been so long since we have.  But it's also really important that we've got the opportunity to do it every year for the next 10 years, too.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...