Jump to content

Dan Duquette on O's Hot Stove at 6pm, Nov 30th


wildcard

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 150
  • Created
  • Last Reply
5 hours ago, Yardball85 said:

Likely Duq Nuggets:

"We've had initial discussions with several agents to see what players we can add to our ballclub."

"We are exploring potential trades to improve our ballclub,  Teams often call us about Zach and Manny, but we have no interest in trading them.  They should be on our ballclub this year.""

"We've had very preliminary discussions with Manny Machado about an extension, but don't see it happening anytime soon.  We do not anticpiate trading Manny either, there are a lot of teams that want him, but w're a better ballclub with him than without him."

Wow! I think DD has lost his marbles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"The club has to decide if Manny is going to be in Baltimore beyond this year."    By "club",  Dan means Peter Angelos.     Dan when asked about Manny staying or being traded says  "i don't know the answer to that question."    That is good, he is only the GM.   lol.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Dan:  "I plan to start making deals around the time pitchers and catchers need to report in February.  I also might wait until March to try to sign some free agents, too."

 

now I didn't hear Dan say anything like that on the broadcast.    I assume that this is sarcasm.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dan's communication style is both interesting and frustrating.   Every time I have heard him talk about the Orioles, from the time he was hired, he talks almost exclusively like the season in front of him is the only season.   "We are good here for this year, we are looking forward to this for our club for this year, etc. etc."   He almost never talks about his philosophy of what kind of club in the future he would like to see and how he plans to get there.   Now I have to assume that he knows his own plans and his own philosophy, but he never communicates any future oriented plans to fans, which is frustrating. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • No one is trading anything close to that for Crochet. But I agree..spend money, not prospects.
    • That's some high standards.  Sinker ball types are always going to have higher FIPs and lower K rates.  The truth is, Quintana is probably out of our price range.  That price range is probably no more than the standard Lyles/Gibson/Kimbrel/Frazier price range until otherwise seen.   Back to Quintana, I think he's the type of guy that if healthy could be a real weapon for us with our home ballpark and a home playoff game if we ever get deep into a series.  
    • That's really the role/opening for next year that we need.  A RHH OF that could play some CF preferably.  Although, I'd lean more to and offensive minded portion of that versus the ability to play CF.  LF is big though at home. I think it's a role that Elias fills through trade, waivers, or maybe even a competition of milb deal types.  Like a RH Sam Hilliard type.  
    • Yeah, he would be good in the Austin Slater role if he was willing to accept it. Not sure that he would be quite as good defensively in CF, given that he has played fewer than 100 innings total in CF since 2021. I highly doubt that he is ready to accept a role as a platoon player though, given that he is not yet 30, and he was an above average starter by rWAR from 2021-23. I doubt he is tendered a contract, given his $6M 2024 salary. His best bet is probably to sign a one year deal with a team that doesn't hope to compete, to attempt to reestablish himself as an everyday player, while the team that signs him can hope to flip him at the trade deadline.
    • I agree. He’d be a great regular season fit in Cinncy’s ballpark. Maybe that confidence of knowing he can hit the ball out to LF at home covers up his other decencies.  As for Crochet… can’t we just resign Burnes?  Crochet would probably cost Holliday, Basallo, and Mayo. Didn’t the deadline teach us the cost of pitching? I’m for trading Mountcastle. I’d hope we can surround the young hitters with a Burnes led staff with adding a vet bat to the DH/1B mix. Other than that, I think we will roll with what we have. And we should. 
    • Hays will want to start somewhere. He shouldn't start for us. We don't want him sitting on the bench looking dejected while Kjerstad and Cowser are mashing bombs onto Eutaw Street.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...