Jump to content

Connolly: Ruben Tejada leader for O's UIF job


wildcard

Recommended Posts

From Baltimorebaseball.com

Ruben Tejada: Right now, the 28-year-old is probably the leader in the clubhouse to be the Orioles’ utility infielder next season. A veteran of eight major league seasons, he played 41 games for the Orioles last year – starting 29 at shortstop and three at third base. A career .251 hitter, he batted .230 with a .293 on-base percentage in the majors in 2017 and .280 in the minors.

The most important skill a utility infielder must exhibit is the ability to play shortstop, and Tejada can do that effectively; he made two errors in 36 games there for the Orioles last year. That’s probably what gives him the edge in the utility-infield battle, though I wouldn’t be surprised if the Orioles sign another fringe major leaguer to compete for the job this spring.

Luis Sardiñas: Orioles fans probably don’t know much about the 24-year-old Venezuelan except the club claimed him from the San Diego Padres on waivers in May and he spent the rest of the year at Triple-A Norfolk.

There are some in the organization that believe Sardiñas is a better fit at utility infielder than Tejada or farmhand Steve Wilkerson because Sardiñas is a switch-hitter, has some speed and can play all around the diamond effectively. He’s a career .229 hitter in parts of four big league seasons, but he hit .319 in 83 Triple-A games in 2017.

I wasn’t sure the Orioles would be able to retain both Tejada and Sardiñas for next year, since they’re obviously battling for the same job. But major league opportunities are difficult to get and Sardiñas/Tejada are in good position for one on Opening Day. Makes sense for both of them to re-up – and both could be Orioles at some point in 2018.

http://www.baltimorebaseball.com/2017/11/29/baltimore-orioles-taking-look-orioles-minor-league-signings-rosa-tejada-sardinas-ryan-ripken/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 49
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Why is it so important they be able to play SS?  We have Manny. Our Util guy should have good speed. Plus the guys mentioned are barely passable at SS. Don't kid yourself on Tejada's or Sardinas' defense.

 

I know the Util IF is more about defense, but so is backup C. Then you have a rule 5 guy. That's why we have a crappy bench every year that doesn't produce dilly dilly.

We use our bench so little that somehow Ryan Flaherty just stole a paycheck for 6 full MLB seasons. I don't think he was ever optioned. Let that sink in. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Why is it so important they be able to play SS?  We have Manny. Our Util guy should have good speed. Plus the guys mentioned are barely passable at SS. Don't kid yourself on Tejada's or Sardinas' defense.

 

I know the Util IF is more about defense, but so is backup C. Then you have a rule 5 guy. That's why we have a crappy bench every year that doesn't produce dilly dilly.

We use our bench so little that somehow Ryan Flaherty just stole a paycheck for 6 full MLB seasons. I don't think he was ever optioned. Let that sink in. 

There is no place any longer for power bats off the bench, like Terry Crowley used to be, for one example.  Buck has either regulars who play 150 games if not injured and then has flawed backups on the bench rather than using the platoon type strategy that Earl used that would have a Merv Rettenmund coming in as a platoon guy, or a Curt Motton or a Roenicke Loewenstein...our bench has players for years  that clearly make the lineup worse if they are in it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, wildcard said:

From Baltimorebaseball.com

Ruben Tejada: Right now, the 28-year-old is probably the leader in the clubhouse to be the Orioles’ utility infielder next season. A veteran of eight major league seasons, he played 41 games for the Orioles last year – starting 29 at shortstop and three at third base. A career .251 hitter, he batted .230 with a .293 on-base percentage in the majors in 2017 and .280 in the minors.

The most important skill a utility infielder must exhibit is the ability to play shortstop, and Tejada can do that effectively; he made two errors in 36 games there for the Orioles last year. That’s probably what gives him the edge in the utility-infield battle, though I wouldn’t be surprised if the Orioles sign another fringe major leaguer to compete for the job this spring.

Luis Sardiñas: Orioles fans probably don’t know much about the 24-year-old Venezuelan except the club claimed him from the San Diego Padres on waivers in May and he spent the rest of the year at Triple-A Norfolk.

There are some in the organization that believe Sardiñas is a better fit at utility infielder than Tejada or farmhand Steve Wilkerson because Sardiñas is a switch-hitter, has some speed and can play all around the diamond effectively. He’s a career .229 hitter in parts of four big league seasons, but he hit .319 in 83 Triple-A games in 2017.

I wasn’t sure the Orioles would be able to retain both Tejada and Sardiñas for next year, since they’re obviously battling for the same job. But major league opportunities are difficult to get and Sardiñas/Tejada are in good position for one on Opening Day. Makes sense for both of them to re-up – and both could be Orioles at some point in 2018.

http://www.baltimorebaseball.com/2017/11/29/baltimore-orioles-taking-look-orioles-minor-league-signings-rosa-tejada-sardinas-ryan-ripken/

 

I think Sardinas is somewhat interesting, but I'd prefer a guy who doesn't have a slap hitter's swing, which both Tejada and Sardinas currently do.  Sardinas looks like he's tried to change his stance/swing and it's an interesting project because he does have some tools.  I'm not sure if it's there yet, the stance changed but the bat path still looked bad to me, though he did hit the ball harder it seems.

That's why I suggested Pablo Reyes or Nate Orf as rule 5 utility options.  Pablo Reyes is if you need a SS (he can also play CF which is cool and useful).  Nate Orf is for you if you want a guy who is polished baseball rat type player and has a good chance to be able to handle the bat at the major league level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hardy is still out there and could come back on a 2M contract.   That would put Tejada  in the Janish role of being called up when there is an injury.

The O's simply do not want to move Manny or Schoop to fill in at SS IMO.  The O's wound rather they play their positions full time and have a backup SS to fill-in.

Hardy and Tejada are both sure handed SS who do not make many errors.  Hardy's range is still pretty good.  Tejada's was hurt by the Utley injury.   Beckham  and Sardinas are high error SS.  Expect 20+ pretty year if either plays full time.  That is why the O's will likely have Beckham start at SS and Hardy or Tejada be the sure handed defensive SS that gets in a lot of games to hold a lead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Why is it so important they be able to play SS?  We have Manny. Our Util guy should have good speed. Plus the guys mentioned are barely passable at SS. Don't kid yourself on Tejada's or Sardinas' defense.

 

I know the Util IF is more about defense, but so is backup C. Then you have a rule 5 guy. That's why we have a crappy bench every year that doesn't produce dilly dilly.

We use our bench so little that somehow Ryan Flaherty just stole a paycheck for 6 full MLB seasons. I don't think he was ever optioned. Let that sink in. 

Because Buck has said, he does not like moving guys around mid-game, if he can help it.

In Buck's manager handbook, his rule is, the first infielder on his bench, must able to play a good SS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Frobby said:

There’s very little chance of Hardy returning here IMO.   He’s never played 2B or 3B, he can’t pinch run, and he’s got nothing left in his bat. He’s not a very good fit for the Orioles IMO.

Wish he would retire and come in as a coach. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Redskins Rick said:

Because Buck has said, he does not like moving guys around mid-game, if he can help it.

In Buck's manager handbook, his rule is, the first infielder on his bench, must able to play a good SS.

That may be in his handbook, but he overlooked it for multiple years when Flaherty was the first IF on the bench. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, phillyOs119 said:

That may be in his handbook, but he overlooked it for multiple years when Flaherty was the first IF on the bench. 

I dont believe he did, if he honestly felt Ryan was that bad, he would have looked elsewhere.

Granted, I think Ryan does a much better job at playing 3rd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Frobby said:

There’s very little chance of Hardy returning here IMO.   He’s never played 2B or 3B, he can’t pinch run, and he’s got nothing left in his bat. He’s not a very good fit for the Orioles IMO.

Hardy plays 2B most of the the time when they are in a shift.  He is a smart enough defensive player to play 2B and 3B by just coming to ST and working with Dickerson to prepare for the season. The O's biggest vulnerability after starter is SS.    Having Hardy on the team takes that vulnerability away.    And whoever plays the UIF is likely not going to hit much so that will not  keep the O's for signing Hardy.

The question is can Hardy get more playing time on another team and make more money?  If he can't and is willing to take a backup role for 2m, I think he is back with the O's as Beckham mentor and backup.

As far as pinch runners look to the backup outfielders.   Santander is probably only with the O's for 44 days and guys like Rickard and Mullins can pinch run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, El Gordo said:

Brock Holt is a super UTIF he would see a lot of playing time. Doubt the Sux non tender him He would have trade value.

Was he hurt last year?  He was terrible and he wasn't good in 2016 either, I doubt he has much value at this point.  He was pretty solid in 2014-2015, but I'm not convinced that he's anything like that player anymore.  He's lost 1.1 ft/sec in speed (according to the statcast sprint leaderboard.  His hard hit balls have decreased significantly as have his line drives which has led to a lower BABIP and virtual no power.  Defensive numbers have gotten worse as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, phillyOs119 said:

Was he hurt last year?  He was terrible and he wasn't good in 2016 either, I doubt he has much value at this point.  He was pretty solid in 2014-2015, but I'm not convinced that he's anything like that player anymore.  He's lost 1.1 ft/sec in speed (according to the statcast sprint leaderboard.  His hard hit balls have decreased significantly as have his line drives which has led to a lower BABIP and virtual no power.  Defensive numbers have gotten worse as well.

Concussion symptoms: http://www.bostonherald.com/sports/red_sox/clubhouse_insider/2017/05/brock_holt_shut_down_for_foreseeable_future_with_lingering

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • No one is trading anything close to that for Crochet. But I agree..spend money, not prospects.
    • That's some high standards.  Sinker ball types are always going to have higher FIPs and lower K rates.  The truth is, Quintana is probably out of our price range.  That price range is probably no more than the standard Lyles/Gibson/Kimbrel/Frazier price range until otherwise seen.   Back to Quintana, I think he's the type of guy that if healthy could be a real weapon for us with our home ballpark and a home playoff game if we ever get deep into a series.  
    • That's really the role/opening for next year that we need.  A RHH OF that could play some CF preferably.  Although, I'd lean more to and offensive minded portion of that versus the ability to play CF.  LF is big though at home. I think it's a role that Elias fills through trade, waivers, or maybe even a competition of milb deal types.  Like a RH Sam Hilliard type.  
    • Yeah, he would be good in the Austin Slater role if he was willing to accept it. Not sure that he would be quite as good defensively in CF, given that he has played fewer than 100 innings total in CF since 2021. I highly doubt that he is ready to accept a role as a platoon player though, given that he is not yet 30, and he was an above average starter by rWAR from 2021-23. I doubt he is tendered a contract, given his $6M 2024 salary. His best bet is probably to sign a one year deal with a team that doesn't hope to compete, to attempt to reestablish himself as an everyday player, while the team that signs him can hope to flip him at the trade deadline.
    • I agree. He’d be a great regular season fit in Cinncy’s ballpark. Maybe that confidence of knowing he can hit the ball out to LF at home covers up his other decencies.  As for Crochet… can’t we just resign Burnes?  Crochet would probably cost Holliday, Basallo, and Mayo. Didn’t the deadline teach us the cost of pitching? I’m for trading Mountcastle. I’d hope we can surround the young hitters with a Burnes led staff with adding a vet bat to the DH/1B mix. Other than that, I think we will roll with what we have. And we should. 
    • Hays will want to start somewhere. He shouldn't start for us. We don't want him sitting on the bench looking dejected while Kjerstad and Cowser are mashing bombs onto Eutaw Street.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...