Jump to content

One scout's report on O's players


wildcard

Recommended Posts

55 minutes ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

I wanted some commentary on Gausman.  Would love to get insight from a scout on why he starts out the first half of the season cold. 

Meh, I wouldn’t call 2 years of starting cold a major trend.   And in 2016, he actually got off to a good start — 3.45 ERA in his first 10 starts — but then had a fairly rough 8 starts (5.19) before settling in for the rest of the season (2.83 in his final 12 starts).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Meh, I wouldn’t call 2 years of starting cold a major trend.   And in 2016, he actually got off to a good start — 3.45 ERA in his first 10 starts — but then had a fairly rough 8 starts (5.19) before settling in for the rest of the season (2.83 in his final 12 starts).

Gausman is to hot and cold for a pitcher of his ability.  Looks like Ubaldo for a stretch and then does an imitation of a top of the rotation starter.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Frobby said:

I still have hopes for Bundy to be better than a no. 3.     I tend to agree with the scout that he doesn’t have the overwhelming stuff of a true ace like Scherzer.    But his pitchability is sky high, and will probably only get better with experience.   He just needs to learn to minimize the damage on the few days when he doesn’t have it.   He had 19 quality starts last year, but in the other 9 he allowed 5+ runs in 8 of them.

I was surprised that the scout thought Jones was still a 60 fielder and used to be 70+.     And in response to wildcard’s comment’s, I don’t see why the scout should have mentioned that Jones plays hurt a lot.    At the end of the day, that’s just part of the equation, and it’s true of many players.

I liked his comments about Schoop and Mancini.

Its pretty simple.  Players that play badly when they play hurt can be very good players when they are not hurt.  Players that play bad when the are not hurt are just bad players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, wildcard said:

Its pretty simple.  Players that play badly when they play hurt can be very good players when they are not hurt.  Players that play bad when the are not hurt are just bad players.

But if they’re regularly hurt, like Jones, then it doesn’t matter.    Do you expect him to be better this year than last?   I don’t.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

I wanted some commentary on Gausman.  Would love to get insight from a scout on why he starts out the first half of the season cold. 

I’ll give you some commentary on Gausman. He’s a guy with a fairly flat fastball that he relies on too much because he has trouble throwing his slider and change for strikes.  The slider isn’t very good most of the time so he’s a two pitch pitcher who does well the first time through the order but struggles afterwards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Frobby said:

But if they’re regularly hurt, like Jones, then it doesn’t matter.    Do you expect him to be better this year than last?   I don’t.   

Depends on the progress of Hays, Mullins, Santander, and Stewart.

If there are outfielders that can be productive in center when Jones needs days off. then Jones may be more productive when he plays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Frobby said:

Meh, I wouldn’t call 2 years of starting cold a major trend.   And in 2016, he actually got off to a good start — 3.45 ERA in his first 10 starts — but then had a fairly rough 8 starts (5.19) before settling in for the rest of the season (2.83 in his final 12 starts).

I think Castillo had a negative impact on our pitching, and it didn’t help that he missed a bunch of ST. I’d like to see Joseph catch Gausman and Bundy primarily next year. 

Even though we only have two SP’s right now, they are young and have a ton of potential. 

I think if we were smart we’d lock up Schoop and Gausman this offseason. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, wildcard said:

Depends on the progress of Hays, Mullins, Santander, and Stewart.

If there are outfielders that can be productive in center when Jones needs days off. then Jones may be more productive when he plays.

If you could move him to RF he 'd be very productive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • No one is trading anything close to that for Crochet. But I agree..spend money, not prospects.
    • That's some high standards.  Sinker ball types are always going to have higher FIPs and lower K rates.  The truth is, Quintana is probably out of our price range.  That price range is probably no more than the standard Lyles/Gibson/Kimbrel/Frazier price range until otherwise seen.   Back to Quintana, I think he's the type of guy that if healthy could be a real weapon for us with our home ballpark and a home playoff game if we ever get deep into a series.  
    • That's really the role/opening for next year that we need.  A RHH OF that could play some CF preferably.  Although, I'd lean more to and offensive minded portion of that versus the ability to play CF.  LF is big though at home. I think it's a role that Elias fills through trade, waivers, or maybe even a competition of milb deal types.  Like a RH Sam Hilliard type.  
    • Yeah, he would be good in the Austin Slater role if he was willing to accept it. Not sure that he would be quite as good defensively in CF, given that he has played fewer than 100 innings total in CF since 2021. I highly doubt that he is ready to accept a role as a platoon player though, given that he is not yet 30, and he was an above average starter by rWAR from 2021-23. I doubt he is tendered a contract, given his $6M 2024 salary. His best bet is probably to sign a one year deal with a team that doesn't hope to compete, to attempt to reestablish himself as an everyday player, while the team that signs him can hope to flip him at the trade deadline.
    • I agree. He’d be a great regular season fit in Cinncy’s ballpark. Maybe that confidence of knowing he can hit the ball out to LF at home covers up his other decencies.  As for Crochet… can’t we just resign Burnes?  Crochet would probably cost Holliday, Basallo, and Mayo. Didn’t the deadline teach us the cost of pitching? I’m for trading Mountcastle. I’d hope we can surround the young hitters with a Burnes led staff with adding a vet bat to the DH/1B mix. Other than that, I think we will roll with what we have. And we should. 
    • Hays will want to start somewhere. He shouldn't start for us. We don't want him sitting on the bench looking dejected while Kjerstad and Cowser are mashing bombs onto Eutaw Street.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...