Jump to content

Is Manny a 5 tool player?


Redskins Rick

Recommended Posts

Since we don't have enough Manny threads. We need another. :)

Please leave all the trade talks to the other threads, his toolset doesn't change based on the team name on his jersey.

This is strictly a discussion on his tool-set.

I think most will agree with that the 5 tools are:

1. hitting for average;

2. hitting for power;

3. base running skills and speed;

4. throwing ability; and

5. fielder abilities ?

Hands down, he is 4 tools for sure.

He has base running skills.

So does he have enough speed to be considered a true 5 tool player?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 60
  • Created
  • Last Reply
2 minutes ago, Redskins Rick said:

The singles he turns into doubles with aggressive base running count for anything?

Do you have to be above average in every category, or can you be passable in all of them while excelling in at least some?

When you factor in the doubles he turns into singles when he doesn't hustle, the lack of SBs, and the senseless outs at 3B, I think he is an average baserunner at best. Fangraphs has him as a negative baserunner throughout his career (except that one year he randomly stole 20 bases), for what it's worth.

I also do not think he has established that he will hit for average consistently. He gets in big slumps when he is overswinging. Never hit for average in the minors, average and OBP dropped to .259/.310 last year. But it's not like he is Chris Davis or anything.

That said, he has power and is among the best I have ever seen at catching and throwing the ball. He is a great overall player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see a "5-tool player" as someone who really contributes positively with all five of those tools. 

I don't count Manny as a 5-tool player. He's only been a SB threat in one of his six MLB seasons, his career SB rate isn't good, and other advanced stats also rate him as below average on the bases. He may not be slow, but his speed tool doesn't make much positive impact on the game. 

He's better than a bunch of the guys I would call 5-tool players though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think he's a true 5-tool player, but then again, very few are. Of the skills you listed, Manny's batting average is pretty unspectacular - although his OBP is pretty good, and maybe you should replace BA with OBP in your list of 5 tools.

 

Moreover, baserunning is average at best, IMO. He makes blunders, and doesn't really steal enough bases to compensate. 

 

That said, his power and glove are far above average, IMO, so he's still a very valuable player ... but perhaps not that diversified

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 99ct said:

I don't think he's a true 5-tool player, but then again, very few are. Of the skills you listed, Manny's batting average is pretty unspectacular - although his OBP is pretty good, and maybe you should replace BA with OBP in your list of 5 tools.

 

Moreover, baserunning is average at best, IMO. He makes blunders, and doesn't really steal enough bases to compensate. 

 

That said, his power and glove are far above average, IMO, so he's still a very valuable player ... but perhaps not that diversified

high .270 to .300, is pretty average, in my opinion.

with his down-year, he is still a career .279 hitter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's a three tool player

He doesn't hit for a high average and certainly not a high OBP

and his base running if poor. I don't know how to research this but I believe he has made the third out at 3B at a historic rate, I counted at least 3 last year alone. Add to that the grounders he doesn't run out, the times he was thrown out at second after admiring his fly ball hitting a wall in the OF (assume he is surprised that it wasn't a HR).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/31/2017 at 3:17 PM, wildbillhiccup said:

Completely agree with you, but I have a hunch we wouldn't have to give up much. The Tigers will just be happy to get out of that contracts, since they're already stuck with Miggy's terrible contract. 

 

3 minutes ago, Redskins Rick said:

high .270 to .300, is pretty average, in my opinion.

with his down-year, he is still a career .279 hitter.

Yeah, sorry, I equate "unspectacular" with "pretty average," as you call it. We're on the same page.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, webbrick2010 said:

He's a three tool player

He doesn't hit for a high average and certainly not a high OBP

and his base running if poor. I don't know how to research this but I believe he has made the third out at 3B at a historic rate, I counted at least 3 last year alone. Add to that the grounders he doesn't run out, the times he was thrown out at second after admiring his fly ball hitting a wall in the OF (assume he is surprised that it wasn't a HR).

Count on WB to be negative.

Scoring criteria is hit for average, not high average and OBP is not counted in the discussion.

Not sure I would call his base running low, as he makes singles into doubles, which helps even out his blunders. Maybe call it average.

I believe that after Buck talked to him behind closed doors, he got over the watching fly balls.

Which makes him 4 tools, not 5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • If they were going to get rid of Fuller they should have done it a month and a half ago. The issues with our hitting were apparent the whole second half of the season. Maybe a firing or two would have sent a message to the players prior to their postseason fizzle. . 
    • What does Eflin and Jimenez signify? It was a very small addition to the payroll. John Angelos would have approved that, if he needed to approve anything at all.
    • I'm not sure that's quite it.  Well, more importantly, I'm not sure that's quite it for me. I absolutely want to win more in the playoffs.  At this point there's no question that for me I'd live through some lousy seasons if it guaranteed a World Series trophy.  I'd give up a lot for that. But unfortunately it's the weird paradox, especially in baseball, where the games that mean so much in terms of perception actually mean very little.   Just look at some the threads posted on this board in recent weeks. "Do the Orioles need more experience"?  (studies have shown this is not the case) "Maybe they need a certain type of hitter/approach!" (no, studies have shown that's not it either) "They must need to build their bullpen a certain way." (nope) "Well you have to be playing well in September to have a chance in October!"  (very much not true) "It must be those nice white boys need somebody to be a jerk" (OK, no real way to quantify that one :)) The Astros must have the secret sauce, they went to the ALCS a lot of times in a row!  Oh, they lost in the 1st round this year. Study after study after study shows that there is no pattern.  There is no "right" way to do it.  There's no way to predict from year to year which teams will or will not go on the run. If for that crazy 8-9th inning on the day after the season the Mets may not have even made the playoffs.  Now they're the example of guys that can "get it done". It's not an excuse, and frankly it's not really my opinion.  It's reality. I do 100% agree with your last 2 sentences.  I don't know what we've done to so displease the baseball gods.
    • It's definitely a possibility, but I wonder if there is actually something going on between Hyde and some players, would it be smart to bring his potential replacement in and subject him to the problem?    The fans, mostly here are the main source of BB being a manager. He's definitely had some MiL success so it's not unreasonable to assume he will be a manager someday. 
    • I think this is spot on in every way.  But I think the fanbase is somewhat divided on how important playoff success is. Put another way, for you, me, and a lot of folks, the playoffs mean a ton.  41 years with no championship or even a pennant is a real long time, and the narrative of the Orioles since 1983 has gotten extremely old. Even the narrative of this winless recent edition of the Os has gotten old. For other fans, the regular season means much more and winning/losing in the playoffs doesn't carry much weight because of the nature of the tournament.   There is no right or wrong way to be a fan of a team. But I can say that if you told me the next 10 years would involve 9 seasons where we lose 90+ games and 1 season where we win the World Series, I will gladly sign up for that.  I am definitely at that point where that title means everything to me and yes 29 teams go home without the ring each year, but 1 team does get it and that needs to be us. And if we get "lucky" like the Tigers on the path there, then bring it on! If the playoffs are a crapshoot, I am tired of that crapshoot rewarding everyone else.
    • More than once Fredi displayed a lack of control that cost him his job. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...