Jump to content

Orioles Interested in Carlos Gonzalez?


wildbillhiccup

Recommended Posts

Cargo was difficult to watch at the plate in 2017.  And predictable.  If you think Adam Jones has a problem with the slider low and away, imagine having his mirror image from the left side of the plate... He doesn't exhibit the patience to lay off the outside junk these days, and going on nothing but my own eyes (my son and I watch a lot of Rockies baseball), he has also noticeably lost his ability to turn on the inside heater.  Balls he would deposit in the RF stands 2-3 years ago, now wind up as fist shots to the second baseman.  His swing is long and heavily dependent on timing.  When it works, he can still crush the ball, and it's as sweet as any swing in the game.  But it seems to me like he's lost some bat speed, and a whole lot of confidence.  He hit much better the final two months of the season, and maybe there were nagging injuries that plagued him in the earlier part of the season.  Still has a good arm, but I think marginal wheels (I have not researched his defensive metrics from last season).  It's possible that a change of scenery is what Cargo needs, and as much as I hate to admit it, I can see DD taking a flyer on Cargo if he's still around in late February... but my instincts tell me the Os should stay away!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Hey, for what it’s worth...

Steamer projects Cargo for a 101 wRC+ 

Steamer projects Austin Hays for a  102 wRC+ 

Steamer projects Anthony Santander for a 97 wRC+

ZiPS projects Cargo for an 88 wRC+

ZiPS projects Hays for a 103 wRC+

ZiPS projects Santander for a 93 wRC+

wRC+ is a context neutral metric that tries to assess total value with the bat. It corrects for the Coors field environment among other things.

Cargo is also poor defensively which isn’t considered by the numbers above.

Edit: 100 is league average for wRC+ and higher is better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TommyPickles said:

Why is Jones/Mancini/Hays/Santander/Rickard/Stewart/Brugman not enough??

We have THREE open spots in the rotation.

Because it's a game of quality not quantity. Jones and Mancini are the only two you named with any sort of Major League success.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, phillyOs119 said:

Hey, for what it’s worth...

Steamer projects Cargo for a 101 wRC+ 

Steamer projects Austin Hays for a  102 wRC+ 

Steamer projects Anthony Santander for a 97 wRC+

ZiPS projects Cargo for an 88 wRC+

ZiPS projects Hays for a 103 wRC+

ZiPS projects Santander for a 93 wRC+

wRC+ is a context neutral metric that tries to assess total value with the bat. It corrects for the Coors field environment among other things.

Cargo is also poor defensively which isn’t consider the numbers above.

Edit: 100 is league average for wRC+ and higher is better.

For comparison, what are the predictions for Granderson and Jay?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Ruzious said:

Better than in Colorado?  It's not worth it to block Hays.  

For a single season? It's definitely worth it. Hayes still needs to force his way onto the club. Maybe this year if he does well enough he can come up and platoon with Gonzalez after Santander can be sent down. If he does well then you keep a spot open for him in 2019. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, oriole said:

For a single season? It's definitely worth it. Hayes still needs to force his way onto the club. Maybe this year if he does well enough he can come up and platoon with Gonzalez after Santander can be sent down. If he does well then you keep a spot open for him in 2019. 

I am not a fan of signing declining players who have benefited from playing half their games in Coors.   CarGo has a career .735 road OPS, .606 last year.    I’m not going to say he’d be the second coming of Garrett Atkins, but I really don’t care to find out.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, oriole said:

For a single season? It's definitely worth it. Hayes still needs to force his way onto the club. Maybe this year if he does well enough he can come up and platoon with Gonzalez after Santander can be sent down. If he does well then you keep a spot open for him in 2019. 

Why?

Do you think he makes this a playoff team?

You think they can tag him with a QO after the season?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I am not a fan of signing declining players who have benefited from playing half their games in Coors.   CarGo has a career .735 road OPS, .606 last year.    I’m not going to say he’d be the second coming of Garrett Atkins, but I really don’t care to find out.    

I think it's worth a one year contract to find out. I'd prefer Granderson or even Jon Jay but they will likely demand more than a one year deal and I don't want to see the OF clogged up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Why?

Do you think he makes this a playoff team?

You think they can tag him with a QO after the season?

No, this is not a playoff team without pitching. They're not rebuilding and they're not spending on bigger name free agents. I would be okay with rolling the dice on Gonzalez only if it's a one year deal. I don't expect a QO, maybe trade him at the deadline if he is having an okay year. But no, Gonzalez does not make this a playoff team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, oriole said:

No, this is not a playoff team without pitching. They're not rebuilding and they're not spending on bigger name free agents. I would be okay with rolling the dice on Gonzalez only if it's a one year deal. I don't expect a QO, maybe trade him at the deadline if he is having an okay year. But no, Gonzalez does not make this a playoff team. 

I just don't see the point.

Frankly it reminds me of the Dark Days and names like Payton and Millar.

Just because Dan can get someone to take his money doesn't mean he should.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • If they were going to get rid of Fuller they should have done it a month and a half ago. The issues with our hitting were apparent the whole second half of the season. Maybe a firing or two would have sent a message to the players prior to their postseason fizzle. . 
    • What does Eflin and Jimenez signify? It was a very small addition to the payroll. John Angelos would have approved that, if he needed to approve anything at all.
    • I'm not sure that's quite it.  Well, more importantly, I'm not sure that's quite it for me. I absolutely want to win more in the playoffs.  At this point there's no question that for me I'd live through some lousy seasons if it guaranteed a World Series trophy.  I'd give up a lot for that. But unfortunately it's the weird paradox, especially in baseball, where the games that mean so much in terms of perception actually mean very little.   Just look at some the threads posted on this board in recent weeks. "Do the Orioles need more experience"?  (studies have shown this is not the case) "Maybe they need a certain type of hitter/approach!" (no, studies have shown that's not it either) "They must need to build their bullpen a certain way." (nope) "Well you have to be playing well in September to have a chance in October!"  (very much not true) "It must be those nice white boys need somebody to be a jerk" (OK, no real way to quantify that one :)) The Astros must have the secret sauce, they went to the ALCS a lot of times in a row!  Oh, they lost in the 1st round this year. Study after study after study shows that there is no pattern.  There is no "right" way to do it.  There's no way to predict from year to year which teams will or will not go on the run. If for that crazy 8-9th inning on the day after the season the Mets may not have even made the playoffs.  Now they're the example of guys that can "get it done". It's not an excuse, and frankly it's not really my opinion.  It's reality. I do 100% agree with your last 2 sentences.  I don't know what we've done to so displease the baseball gods.
    • It's definitely a possibility, but I wonder if there is actually something going on between Hyde and some players, would it be smart to bring his potential replacement in and subject him to the problem?    The fans, mostly here are the main source of BB being a manager. He's definitely had some MiL success so it's not unreasonable to assume he will be a manager someday. 
    • I think this is spot on in every way.  But I think the fanbase is somewhat divided on how important playoff success is. Put another way, for you, me, and a lot of folks, the playoffs mean a ton.  41 years with no championship or even a pennant is a real long time, and the narrative of the Orioles since 1983 has gotten extremely old. Even the narrative of this winless recent edition of the Os has gotten old. For other fans, the regular season means much more and winning/losing in the playoffs doesn't carry much weight because of the nature of the tournament.   There is no right or wrong way to be a fan of a team. But I can say that if you told me the next 10 years would involve 9 seasons where we lose 90+ games and 1 season where we win the World Series, I will gladly sign up for that.  I am definitely at that point where that title means everything to me and yes 29 teams go home without the ring each year, but 1 team does get it and that needs to be us. And if we get "lucky" like the Tigers on the path there, then bring it on! If the playoffs are a crapshoot, I am tired of that crapshoot rewarding everyone else.
    • More than once Fredi displayed a lack of control that cost him his job. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...