Jump to content

Miguel Castro has a fourth option available for 2018


wildcard

Recommended Posts

As reported  by Roch.

http://www.masnsports.com/school-of-roch/2018/01/more-on-orioles-minicamp-1.html

From Cots Contracts:

  • A player may be eligible for a fourth option year if he has been optioned in three seasons but does not yet have five full seasons of professional experience. A full season is defined as being on an active pro roster for at least 90 days in a season. The 90-day requirement means short-season leagues (New-York Penn, Northwest, Pioneer, Appalachian, Gulf Coast, Arizona Rookie, Dominican and Venezuelan Summer Leagues) do not count as full seasons for the purposes of determining eligibility for a fourth option.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey, that's the first good news we've seen in a while. I'm still skeptical about moving him to the rotation but this gives a good buffer between watching him suck in Baltimore and watching him suck in Norfolk. Obviously, hopefully he doesn't and I'm not even saying I believe he will. I don't know what to make of the transition. I like him in the bullpen but considering the lack of rotation options I understand the line of thinking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, wildcard said:

As reported  by Roch.

http://www.masnsports.com/school-of-roch/2018/01/more-on-orioles-minicamp-1.html

From Cots Contracts:

  • A player may be eligible for a fourth option year if he has been optioned in three seasons but does not yet have five full seasons of professional experience. A full season is defined as being on an active pro roster for at least 90 days in a season. The 90-day requirement means short-season leagues (New-York Penn, Northwest, Pioneer, Appalachian, Gulf Coast, Arizona Rookie, Dominican and Venezuelan Summer Leagues) do not count as full seasons for the purposes of determining eligibility for a fourth option.

I guess he could start in AAA.  Rotation of Gausman, Bundy, Cortes, Wright, Ynoa sounds good to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll be in the minority here.  The kid worked hard to show he belongs in the majors last year.  Sending him down could be a knock to his confidence.  We're not competing for anything in 2018 and don't have other good options for the rotation.  Let him get his feet wet as a major league starter where he'll learn the quickest - in the majors.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Ruzious said:

I'll be in the minority here.  The kid worked hard to show he belongs in the majors last year.  Sending him down could be a knock to his confidence.  We're not competing for anything in 2018 and don't have other good options for the rotation.  Let him get his feet wet as a major league starter where he'll learn the quickest - in the majors.  

They're competing to win the division and the World Series. This is not a team in rebuild. Are they any good? Probably not...but I doubt the players are giving up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, oriole said:

They're competing to win the division and the World Series. This is not a team in rebuild. Are they any good? Probably not...but I doubt the players are giving up.

It's got zero to do with players giving up.  Obviously, everyone on the team is going to try to do their best and win as much as possible - I'd hope.  But this team has as much chance as my niece's softball team to win the WS - maybe slightly better to win the division.  I don't call that competing.  You can give them certificates of participation with that kind of competing.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, oriole said:

They're competing to win the division and the World Series. This is not a team in rebuild. Are they any good? Probably not...but I doubt the players are giving up.

Well, until there is an official statement otherwise, I think you are correctly stating the company line.  However, here is the immediate problem.  They cannot compete without Castro stepping forward....in whatever capacity.  If he is in the pen, he simply needs to build some stamina to last an entire season.  If it is in the rotation, well he probably needs to be our current 4 or 5 starter.

The reality to the company line, they do not have an adequate body to take whatever spot they choose to not use him.  Unless we live in fantasy baseball where he can both start and relieve.  Either way, that is not a recipe for competing.

Perhaps use the next few months to see what nuggets we like and lock a bunch of em up for 5-7 years.  I am actually pretty optimistic about the young guys.  It's not my money, but I'd rather do that than unload $50+MM on another bottom feeder starting pitcher.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Ruzious said:

It's got zero to do with players giving up.  Obviously, everyone on the team is going to try to do their best and win as much as possible - I'd hope.  But this team has as much chance as my niece's softball team to win the WS - maybe slightly better to win the division.  I don't call that competing.  You can give them certificates of participation with that kind of competing.   

I'm not saying they're favored to be an above average club. I'm also not going to say a team with a decent roster has absolutely no chance. Don't get me wrong, I think fourth or fifth place is likely. But it's still well within reason to think they can be competitive for a majority of the season. You're telling me the season is lost already so just throw Castro out there because it doesn't matter. Im telling you that it does matter and you could say it matters even more to test the waters of Castro the SP in AAA so he doesn't mess with the delicate balance between potential contender and bottom dweller. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Ruzious said:

I'll be in the minority here.  The kid worked hard to show he belongs in the majors last year.  Sending him down could be a knock to his confidence.  We're not competing for anything in 2018 and don't have other good options for the rotation.  Let him get his feet wet as a major league starter where he'll learn the quickest - in the majors.  

I agree with the first half of your statement, with one small detail.

Keep him as a swingman/long reliever but also use him as the "emergency" or 6th starter to get him a taste of starting, without throwing him out there every few days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, George Zuverink said:

What about that rotation “sounds good”to you?

I’m not Yardball, but I’m guessing that Yardball thinks 2018 is a lost season so it really doesn’t matter.  And by throwing Ynoa, Cortes, Wright, Mesa, etc out there, you have the chance of creating a valuable asset. One of those guys showing they are a legit starter would be huge for the future of the org. 5 more years at extremely cost controlled salaries.

You throw MiGo or Tillman out there on a one year deal, there is no upside. Even if they are great, they are either gone or expensive. Even Lynn or Cobb, they’d have to be really amazing to be significantly better than what it’d take to sign them. The Orioles need assets, you can’t create assets without opportunity.

Aaron Judge wasn’t a top prospect, Jordan Montgomery wasn’t a top prospect. #10 and #15 respectively on just the Yankees prior to this past season (per minorleagueball/John Sickels) is, neither were anywhere close to being top 100 prospects, but they got an opportunity and now they’re huge assets. Not saying any of those O’s pitchers have anything close to Judge upside, but Montgomery, that’s well within the realm of possibility.

Edit: And before anyone says, well if those FA guys you mentioned are good the O’s can just trade them at the deadline for prospects, think to yourself when the last time the O’s traded a significant major leaguer at the deadline for prospects.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • If they were going to get rid of Fuller they should have done it a month and a half ago. The issues with our hitting were apparent the whole second half of the season. Maybe a firing or two would have sent a message to the players prior to their postseason fizzle. . 
    • What does Eflin and Jimenez signify? It was a very small addition to the payroll. John Angelos would have approved that, if he needed to approve anything at all.
    • I'm not sure that's quite it.  Well, more importantly, I'm not sure that's quite it for me. I absolutely want to win more in the playoffs.  At this point there's no question that for me I'd live through some lousy seasons if it guaranteed a World Series trophy.  I'd give up a lot for that. But unfortunately it's the weird paradox, especially in baseball, where the games that mean so much in terms of perception actually mean very little.   Just look at some the threads posted on this board in recent weeks. "Do the Orioles need more experience"?  (studies have shown this is not the case) "Maybe they need a certain type of hitter/approach!" (no, studies have shown that's not it either) "They must need to build their bullpen a certain way." (nope) "Well you have to be playing well in September to have a chance in October!"  (very much not true) "It must be those nice white boys need somebody to be a jerk" (OK, no real way to quantify that one :)) The Astros must have the secret sauce, they went to the ALCS a lot of times in a row!  Oh, they lost in the 1st round this year. Study after study after study shows that there is no pattern.  There is no "right" way to do it.  There's no way to predict from year to year which teams will or will not go on the run. If for that crazy 8-9th inning on the day after the season the Mets may not have even made the playoffs.  Now they're the example of guys that can "get it done". It's not an excuse, and frankly it's not really my opinion.  It's reality. I do 100% agree with your last 2 sentences.  I don't know what we've done to so displease the baseball gods.
    • It's definitely a possibility, but I wonder if there is actually something going on between Hyde and some players, would it be smart to bring his potential replacement in and subject him to the problem?    The fans, mostly here are the main source of BB being a manager. He's definitely had some MiL success so it's not unreasonable to assume he will be a manager someday. 
    • I think this is spot on in every way.  But I think the fanbase is somewhat divided on how important playoff success is. Put another way, for you, me, and a lot of folks, the playoffs mean a ton.  41 years with no championship or even a pennant is a real long time, and the narrative of the Orioles since 1983 has gotten extremely old. Even the narrative of this winless recent edition of the Os has gotten old. For other fans, the regular season means much more and winning/losing in the playoffs doesn't carry much weight because of the nature of the tournament.   There is no right or wrong way to be a fan of a team. But I can say that if you told me the next 10 years would involve 9 seasons where we lose 90+ games and 1 season where we win the World Series, I will gladly sign up for that.  I am definitely at that point where that title means everything to me and yes 29 teams go home without the ring each year, but 1 team does get it and that needs to be us. And if we get "lucky" like the Tigers on the path there, then bring it on! If the playoffs are a crapshoot, I am tired of that crapshoot rewarding everyone else.
    • More than once Fredi displayed a lack of control that cost him his job. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...