Jump to content

Grade the Gausman Deal


Frobby

Grade the Gausman Deal  

187 members have voted

  1. 1. What’s your grade for the Gausman deal


This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 08/11/18 at 01:24

Recommended Posts

http://meadowparty.com/blog/2018/08/09/klawchat-8-9-18/

Quote

romorr: There enough J2 talent to justify that Gausman trade if we lose out on Victor Victor? That inclusion of O’Day is awful right? A rebuilding team saving 10 million, at the costs of better prospects, is indefensible. 
Keith Law: There’s no justifying it even if you get VVM, because the trade only gave you a ‘portion’ of him. I am assuming ownership ordered Duquette to shave payroll.

Don't like Keith Law much but he's on point here.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LocoChris said:

http://meadowparty.com/blog/2018/08/09/klawchat-8-9-18/

Don't like Keith Law much but he's on point here.

For the most part yes, but I don’t think anyone is looking at the trade and thinking the 2.5m in slot is a significant part of the return. Dumping O’Day’s salary was a significant part of the return whether one likes it or not. Also to go back to the international money, they do have more than they need, but to be fair, Miami could have added more (and still can with waiver trades), in which case it may have been needed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

This might be in preparation for sale of the team this offseason. 

Not sure about a sale, but clearing salary with the MASN dispute, possible (likely) upcoming attendance revenue decrease, need for additional investment in scouting/player development, and generally a bloated MLB payroll would be plenty of reasons to want to shed salary regardless of the possible sale of the team.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Luke-OH said:

For the most part yes, but I don’t think anyone is looking at the trade and thinking the 2.5m in slot is a significant part of the return. Dumping O’Day’s salary was a significant part of the return whether one likes it or not. Also to go back to the international money, they do have more than they need, but to be fair, Miami could have added more (and still can with waiver trades), in which case it may have been needed.

I agree. The trade was all about dumping salary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, theocean said:

I agree. The trade was all about dumping salary.

Agree also. But that's not necessarily a bad thing. O'Day was set to make $9M next year and there's no need for a $9M RP on a rebuilding team.  Additionally, no telling what kinda pitcher O'Day will be next year. Hasn't looked great since 2015, another year older next year, coming off significant injury.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, LocoChris said:

Shedding $9 mil at the expense of better prospects isn’t what a rebuilding team should be doing. 

Disagree.  Shedding salary is a huge part of what they should be doing.  Tampa Bay is committed to less than $10mil next year.  Now, when they're done with arbitration and the minimum salaries for their pre-arb players, it will certainly be more than that.  But, they dumped all of their big salaries.  We've added quality depth to the farm, even if we didn't get more than one potential "star" player.  We've added international slot allocation to help us reel in the consensus #1 international amateur in this year's class.  We've committed to spending more on scouting, player development, and international talent.  That cost money and one of the ways you get that money is to shed unneeded salaries.  O'Day was an unneeded salary.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, NCRaven said:

Disagree.  Shedding salary is a huge part of what they should be doing.  [...] We've committed to spending more on scouting, player development, and international talent.  That cost money and one of the ways you get that money is to shed unneeded salaries.  O'Day was an unneeded salary.

Yes, plus the team will be facing the small matters of cratering attendance for the (hopefully only) near future, abysmal TV ratings, and the inevitable ingestion of a certain 1st baseman's contract. Have to clean some house before the rebuild begins in earnest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, theocean said:

I agree. The trade was all about dumping salary.

It wasn’t all about dumping salary, but it was arguably the 2nd piece in the trade. JCE as grades by some is a 10-12M piece, dumping the salary is worth nearly that much. If they just wanted to dump salary they could have got rid of Trumbo too, maybe Gausman, Trumbo, and O’Day for Phillips or Zimmerman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...