Jump to content

Connolly/Elias interview: Dominican facility upgrades, etc


interloper

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, LTO's said:

The Mesa brothers, only one of which is an actual prospect, are gone. They are of no importance to what's left on the market. How much do you think the Orioles should spend on Sanchez? If you think they should spend the majority of what they have then I'm thankful you are not running things. Outside of him, there's nothing left. Elias in his Q&A said teams aren't expecting any other Cubans to hit the market this cycle. So the O's currently have 6 MM, Sanchez is worth around 2MM. What would you suggest they do with the 4 MM they'd have left? I'd much rather see them fix their facilities/begin to have a presence in VZ. There simply aren't any players left worth spending the money on. You can criticize the previous regime but it seems like spilled milk at this point.

How much money do the Marlins have now? Some team has offered 2 million to Sanchez if he waits until July to sign.  So probably would cost more than $2 million.  I am not sure why they can't build a facility in the Dominican and sign Sanchez.  I am sure you could get a loan to build a decent facility like most every other team has.  And spread the cost over the next 20 years and then the cost is negligible. 

The fact that we are limited so much financially that we can't sign a guy for $2.5 million and also invest in scouts and analytics after shedding so much salaries from last season.  I am not sure why no one is questioning anything the club had done.

Salaries shed: Beckham, Gausman, O'Day, Jones, Tillman, Machado, Schoop, Brach and Rasmus.  Plus I am sure Hyde is making at least a couple million less than Buck. Tons of money yet but it is strange that no one cares how cheap the team has become. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 100
  • Created
  • Last Reply
1 minute ago, atomic said:

How much money do the Marlins have now? Some team has offered 2 million to Sanchez if he waits until July to sign.  So probably would cost more than $2 million.  I am not sure why they can't build a facility in the Dominican and sign Sanchez.  I am sure you could get a loan to build a decent facility like most every other team has.  And spread the cost over the next 20 years and then the cost is negligible. 

The fact that we are limited so much financially that we can't sign a guy for $2.5 million and also invest in scouts and analytics after shedding so much salaries from last season.  I am not sure why no one is questioning anything the club had done.

Salaries shed: Beckham, Gausman, O'Day, Jones, Tillman, Machado, Schoop, Brach and Rasmus.  Plus I am sure Hyde is making at least a couple million less than Buck. Tons of money yet but it is strange that no one cares how cheap the team has become. 

So building the infrastructure, hiring scouts, etc  to do all these new things is cheap? 

No team has $2M other than the Orioles. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Right, more biometrics than in-game performance data.  I could certainly see the usefulness there.  I almost see that more as scouting than statistics.

It’s a blend, the trick is figuring out what can currently be measured objectively that has predictive value and what a human scout can provide subjective data on that has predictive value and combining those things into your player acquisition model.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, eddie83 said:

So building the infrastructure, hiring scouts, etc  to do all these new things is cheap? 

No team has $2M other than the Orioles

Yeah but other teams have offered Sanchez $2 million if he waits until next year.   

Yes hiring scouts is very cheap. You would be surprised how little they make. Even a top programmer is going to cost you less than $200k a year.   I am not sure what infrastructure they have but as I posted from the article in 2015 that 15 teams had recently built new facilities in DR for an average cost of $4 million. The most expensive facility was only $8 million So yes that is cheap.   It isn't something you only use one year like a Trumbo salary.  So if you get 25 years use out of the building the costs are next to nothing per year.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, atomic said:

How much money do the Marlins have now? Some team has offered 2 million to Sanchez if he waits until July to sign.  So probably would cost more than $2 million.  I am not sure why they can't build a facility in the Dominican and sign Sanchez.  I am sure you could get a loan to build a decent facility like most every other team has.  And spread the cost over the next 20 years and then the cost is negligible. 

The fact that we are limited so much financially that we can't sign a guy for $2.5 million and also invest in scouts and analytics after shedding so much salaries from last season.  I am not sure why no one is questioning anything the club had done.

Salaries shed: Beckham, Gausman, O'Day, Jones, Tillman, Machado, Schoop, Brach and Rasmus.  Plus I am sure Hyde is making at least a couple million less than Buck. Tons of money yet but it is strange that no one cares how cheap the team has become. 

You're being obtuse about this. What Elias said is completely reasonable. They're upgrading where they can right now. Other things will take longer. What might take longer?

1. Getting your landlord to agree to a major construction project.
2. Having an architect design the complex that you need (e.g., with smart baseball input)
3. Identifying contractor(s) to build.
4. Acquiring permits.
5. Putting together a finance package.
6. Creating a building schedule that doesn't, or mitigates, how much it interferes with our ongoing work with players at the same facility.

With respect to Sanchez, he said what any boss would want their employees to say. We're in on the opportunity and will certainly want to make progress in a financially reasonable manner. Think of another example to illustrate their thought processes. Imagine if Caleb Joseph were a Cuban SS like Sanchez. Sure, we have more money to sign him, but would it be smart to spend that money? Does your valuation of a player matter at all or is Elias supposed to just throw millions at players with marginal/good upside? It seems like you think they should max out on every available name irrespective of Elias's valuation of that player. That's a recipe for financial disaster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My note on the signing or subsequent failure to sign Yolbert Sanchez.

Yes, the Orioles have enough money that if they wanted to back up the truck they could be 99.9% certain of signing him.

But think of it this way, what if the they scout him and assess the reports and data and determine that a player of that caliber is worth a 1.75M bonus. Let’s say another team assessed him move favorably and is willing to offer 2-2.5M if he waits until July 2. Sanchez tells the O’s 2.5M or I wait. 

This is obviously hypothetical, but in that situation and you are Elias, let’s just say given the green light to spend freely internationally on a team the historically has refused to do so and been skeptical of the market in general. Do you want your first move to be overpaying a guy the you see as a lower bonus talent?

That may not be what’s happening here, but that’s a realistic explanation if he’s not signed given everything we know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, interloper said:

I just keep coming back to "nowhere near up to the standards that I want" in re: to the DR facility. Strong words. Reminds me of the MacPhail/ST facilities thing. 

I can't even find a photo of the Orioles facility. The Yankees facility looks nice.

The Phillies and Twins just opened a joint facility that cost $18 million:

https://www.mlb.com/phillies/news/phillies-open-baseball-academy-in-dominican/c-213691822


 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, atomic said:

Tons of money yet but it is strange that no one cares how cheap the team has become. 

I think it's strange that you take this position having lived through the 1998-2011 period where the Orioles were above-average in payroll but had a comically inept farm system, horrid infrastructure, and were 69-93 every year.

Actually it's not that strange, you just like being the guy who knows the current plan (whatever that is) is wrong.  What percentage of Duquette moves did you cheer?  10%?  Were you happy with the endless string of Danys Baez signings a dozen years ago because it kept the team from losing 100?  I'm sure you weren't, even though that's exactly what you're asking for now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, atomic said:

Yeah but other teams have offered Sanchez $2 million if he waits until next year.   

Yes hiring scouts is very cheap. You would be surprised how little they make. Even a top programmer is going to cost you less than $200k a year.   I am not sure what infrastructure they have but as I posted from the article in 2015 that 15 teams had recently built new facilities in DR for an average cost of $4 million. The most expensive facility was only $8 million So yes that is cheap.   It isn't something you only use one year like a Trumbo salary.  So if you get 25 years use out of the building the costs are next to nothing per year.  

So what is your point?  Just because teams have more money next year does that mean Sanchez will get that much? The last thing the Orioles should do is let his agent control things. If he thinks he will get more elsewhere good for him. 

I was using scouts as an example of increased costs. They are rebuilding the entire organization.

I really don’t know what you are getting at. Should they waste money on FA’s? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Luke-OH said:

My note on the signing or subsequent failure to sign Yolbert Sanchez.

Yes, the Orioles have enough money that if they wanted to back up the truck they could be 99.9% certain of signing him.

 But think of it this way, what if the they scout him and assess the reports and data and determine that a player of that caliber is worth a 1.75M bonus. Let’s say another team assessed him move favorably and is willing to offer 2-2.5M if he waits until July 2. Sanchez tells the O’s 2.5M or I wait. 

 This is obviously hypothetical, but in that situation and you are Elias, let’s just say given the green light to spend freely internationally on a team the historically has refused to do so and been skeptical of the market in general. Do you want your first move to be overpaying a guy the you see as a lower bonus talent?

 That may not be what’s happening here, but that’s a realistic explanation if he’s not signed given everything we know.

If Sanchez is worth 1.75 million he is worth 2.5 million.  Really if you think he can contribute at the major league level you give him the 2.5 million.   He is 21.  This isn't a 16 or 18 year old player you are talking about.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, eddie83 said:

Should they waste money on FA’s? 

The gist of atomic's position is yes, the O's should waste money on FAs. He doesn't have any opinion on the marginal value of a $ spent by the Orioles. It matters not if our $ have the financial value of a Venezuelan bolivar, we should spend whatever it takes on whoever will take it, right now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, atomic said:

How much money do the Marlins have now? Some team has offered 2 million to Sanchez if he waits until July to sign.  So probably would cost more than $2 million.  I am not sure why they can't build a facility in the Dominican and sign Sanchez.  I am sure you could get a loan to build a decent facility like most every other team has.  And spread the cost over the next 20 years and then the cost is negligible. 

The fact that we are limited so much financially that we can't sign a guy for $2.5 million and also invest in scouts and analytics after shedding so much salaries from last season.  I am not sure why no one is questioning anything the club had done.

Salaries shed: Beckham, Gausman, O'Day, Jones, Tillman, Machado, Schoop, Brach and Rasmus.  Plus I am sure Hyde is making at least a couple million less than Buck. Tons of money yet but it is strange that no one cares how cheap the team has become. 

Dude, relax. This is how a rebuild that is done the correct way should go ... you should take a look at 'The R Factor' ... it's a model to follow that helps to define what it takes to become an elite leader with a model for success ... at this point, we are at the first stage of the process (R:1, Pause), maybe beginning the second stage (R:2, Get your mind right) ... it will be OK, we are in great hands with Elias.

The R Factor Disciplines

Event + Response = Outcome

 

Manage the 'R' - you cannot control the 'E', but how you manage the 'R' determines your 'O'

 

Above the Line response/behavior [Intentional, On-purpose, Skillful]
__________________

Below the Line response/behavior [Impulsive, On Auto-pilot, Resistant]

 

The Six R Factor Disciplines provide you with a system for "Managing the R Above the Line." The application of these disciplines, not the circumstances you face, determines the quality of outcomes you produce.

R:1 Press Pause.

Before you Respond, slow down & give yourself time to think. Focus on understanding the situation and what you are trying to accomplish. Get off autopilot. Be exceptionally clear about the Event you are experiencing and the Outcome you are pursuing.

R:2 Get Your Mind Right.

Pay attention to your inner Response. Get into a productive mindset by taking ownership of what you focus on & the story you tell yourself.

R:3 Step Up.

Respond 'Above the Line.' Engage in the best possible Response given the Outcome you want and the situation you are in. When circumstances call for it, elevate your Response. Your Response is most important when the Event is most difficult.

R:4 Adjust & Adapt.

Get good at change. Life requires you to make changes whether you are ready or not. Success goes to those who are adaptable.

R:5 Make a Difference.

Create great experiences for others. Your attitude & behavior are deeply personal but rarely private. What you do has a profound impact on the people around you. Your R is an E for others.

R:6 Build Skill.

Be intentional about the habits you develop. Your behavior patterns have you on a path. Develop the habits & skills that will take you where you want to go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




×
×
  • Create New...