Jump to content

Chris Davis 2019 and beyond


Camden_yardbird

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I suspect that Elias would have to get clearance from ownership to release a contract that big.    I also suspect this topic was discussed in some detail before Elias took the job and there’s already an understanding in principle about what criteria would be useAlld to make that decision.    I will be surprised if Elias goes to ownership for approval of Davis’ release and doesn’t get that approval.   Of course, we may never know if he tried to get approval and didn’t.   

All very good points.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 5.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
10 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I suspect that Elias would have to get clearance from ownership to release a contract that big.    I also suspect this topic was discussed in some detail before Elias took the job and there’s already an understanding in principle about what criteria would be used to make that decision.    I will be surprised if Elias goes to ownership for approval of Davis’ release and doesn’t get that approval.   Of course, we may never know if he tried to get approval and didn’t.   

You're probably right, particularly since it was primarily Peter who negotiated and signed off on that contract, but from a business prospective, I would hope that the sign-off is more a formality. At this point, it's a sunk cost. The Orioles aren't getting that money back whether he's on the roster or not and the idea of recouping some value from him if he bounces back shouldn't be the main thought. At some point, his roster spot (either 25 man or 40 man) is worth more than whatever hope the Birds have he can bounce back. At this point, it would take a significant improvement to even be replacement level which right now, they get more value from him off the roster than on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, jamalshw said:

You're probably right, particularly since it was primarily Peter who negotiated and signed off on that contract, but from a business prospective, I would hope that the sign-off is more a formality. At this point, it's a sunk cost. The Orioles aren't getting that money back whether he's on the roster or not and the idea of recouping some value from him if he bounces back shouldn't be the main thought. At some point, his roster spot (either 25 man or 40 man) is worth more than whatever hope the Birds have he can bounce back. At this point, it would take a significant improvement to even be replacement level which right now, they get more value from him off the roster than on it.

Getting back to what I said earlier in the thread, I think a lot will depend on just how obvious it becomes that Davis can’t be salvaged (if that is the case).    Let’s say after two months he has a .700 OPS with a low average but a decent number of homers, WAR hovering right around 0 — is that enough to conclude he can’t be salvaged?   Probably not.    But if his OPS is under .600 and he’s already at -1 WAR, the case gets a lot stronger.    I think he gets 2 months at minimum no matter what.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Frobby said:

Getting back to what I said earlier in the thread, I think a lot will depend on just how obvious it becomes that Davis can’t be salvaged (if that is the case).    Let’s say after two months he has a .700 OPS with a low average but a decent number of homers, WAR hovering right around 0 — is that enough to conclude he can’t be salvaged?   Probably not.    But if his OPS is under .600 and he’s already at -1 WAR, the case gets a lot stronger.    I think he gets 2 months at minimum no matter what.   

I'm really surprised anyone thinks he can be salvaged. Not you, just in general. His numbers have gotten drastically worse 3 straight years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

So much like Darth Vader killing the Emperor in the Return of the Jedi, Davis might fulfill is contract just not in the way originally envisioned.

 

4 hours ago, Ohfan67 said:

Davis does have some value to the Orioles this year. He’s going to play a key role in The Orioles getting the number one pick in 2020. 

I dont think I want to see 4 more years of a sub .600 OPS. I hope for everyone involved this is the last year if Davis struggles again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, jamalshw said:

You're probably right, particularly since it was primarily Peter who negotiated and signed off on that contract, but from a business prospective, I would hope that the sign-off is more a formality. At this point, it's a sunk cost. The Orioles aren't getting that money back whether he's on the roster or not and the idea of recouping some value from him if he bounces back shouldn't be the main thought. At some point, his roster spot (either 25 man or 40 man) is worth more than whatever hope the Birds have he can bounce back. At this point, it would take a significant improvement to even be replacement level which right now, they get more value from him off the roster than on it.

There is a non-zero change that he suffers ill health or tragedy. Or grows tired of the plight of pretending. I suspect the roster spot does not even become relevant for three seasons. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Legend_Of_Joey said:

0-2, 2 k's plus a BB

FTFY

Not a great day but did work the BB in his last AB.  Then we had all of the Kruk comments about missing the ball by a bunch in the previous AB.  Baby steps - from looking to missing to walking 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • But look how healthy they are.
    • The fact that Justin Armbruester led all Orioles minor league pitcher with just 119.1 is pathetic! The pitching development guys are babying the SPs. This is emblematic of a philosophy that is destined to fail. Guys need to pitch to get better. Guys need to learn to get hitters out the second or third time through the order. I think this is a combination of a bad philosophy and not drafting SP talent in the early rounds. Broken system.
    • The wall was yet another case, in the case of many’s. Where Elias thought he was smarter than everybody  and decided to make hitting homers to left field almost impossible and so in his “genius”he only drafted left-handed hitters. Hence, we have trouble hitting left handers ( the only good thing that came of this is they got Gunner Henderson Earlier than anybody else was willing to draft him. ) No right handed batter would sign  here ever unless it was an extreme overpay. I have hated that wall from day one and I don’t think it lasts much longer. Once they start doing the major renovations, I guarantee it comes in maybe not the extent of what it was before maybe  but it’s coming in.
    • And that's fine. I'm not trying to pick on you, because there are literally dozens of posts I could have responded to but didn't, but it seems to me a lot of people are asking for contradictory things.
    • Something that was an open question during much of the year was if Burnes' line about not trying for strikeouts was BS. Broadly I think he gave the market evidence in the end game that he is a master craftsman, and of course 30 year old pitchers have to regulate intensity to complete the season. The 2021 season was just weird.     At ages 25-26, he got most of a year off, and then he got babied like basically every pitcher in the world in Year 1 after COVID. In 2022 they pushed him for more, and the per-batter effectiveness eroded, setting up that notable 2023 Arbitration hearing that helped make him a 2024 Oriole. A GM wanting his services....don't nitpick.    There will be bidders. Unless Rubenstein is planning for three or more mega contracts at the end of the decade, I think there are places it makes more sense to go.
    • It only takes 2 arms if you'd have him in the rotation over Suarez. Personally, I'd have Suarez in the rotation over him going in to next year as things stand now.
    • I feel like they did it because our pitching sucked. Now it doesn't suck, so let's split the difference. I think it would be a mistake to go into 2025 with the current park dimensions. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...