Jump to content

I really want to keep Villar (Update: Traded to Marlins for LHS Easton Lucas)


AceKing

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, sportsfan8703 said:

You might be right but our SS options are embarrassing. Plus how much does Villar setting the table help out the hitters behind him?

Chris Davis could play shortstop.  Hanser is probably as good there as Villar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

You might be right but our SS options are embarrassing. Plus how much does Villar setting the table help out the hitters behind him?

I have no idea whether the Orioles will shell out millions of dollars to retain any over-25-years-old (or so) position players next year (or the following year). But a couple of observations:

1. While I don't know about Elias, Hyde sure seems to like the speed game. Unlike the Orioles' other fast guys, Villar can hit. From both sides of the plate. 

2. I think the Orioles may be making a mistake by peeling back salary to the bare minimum plus the contracted amounts for Davis + Bundy + a portion of Cobb + maybe Givens. The Orioles are trying to copy the 'Stros' rebuilding plan, but there are two obvious differences in those teams' situations: the Orioles' trip from worst to contention is likely to take longer, and the rebuilt Orioles' chances of ever winning a division title, let alone dominating their division for several years or ever getting to the World Series, are significantly worse than Houston's were when they embarked on their plan.

Now I'm getting into an area about which I know even less than I do about other stiff I opine on, but I wonder about the long-term effects on the Orioles ' dwindling fan base and ticket sales of several years in which they neither promote intriguing young position players nor retain the few competent major leaguers they have acquired via trades or free agencies. (I'm assuming that Mancini is in a separate category and will be around for a while, though I realize there's no certainty of that.)

I don't think the average fan or potential fan, adult or kid, cares much about the success of Bowie or Delmarva. I think they want to see, in person or on MASN, guys in Oriole uniforms who have at least a chance to win, who won't be out of a game after the second inning, and who they either learn to identify with over the course of a couple of seasons or see as potential parts of a brighter Oriole future. The Orioles' rebuilding strategy apparently will offer fans very little or none of these things for at least a few years (2018-20); that's pretty much what the Astros did after Luhnow was hired as GM between the 2011 and '12 seasons. How many of those fans will give up their season tickets, buy tickets to fewer games (or none at all), and how many will come back if and when the Orioles succeed in their turnaround are things I can't begin to predict. But it seems to me that the investment of, say, $5 to $10 million in each of the next couple of years on competent ML position players who won't block anyone in the system might pay for itself in the long run by preserving a little more of what remains of the fan base, though I suppose nobody will ever know one way or the other. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, weams said:

The 2020 Orioles won't carry his expense. 

But he looks too good to non tender.   Looks more like a tender and trade scenario.   He will probably be very available again this off season.   Elias will have to get creative to trade him.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here’s why we tender Villar,

1. He helps out the lineup. Who wants to see Mancini get pitched around?  He helps everyone slot into their correct spots in the lineup.  It takes a lot of pressure of other players.

2. Offseason trade potential. There wasn’t a demand for his skillset at the break. But teams like Clev, Oak, LAA, Cinn, Cubs,  and SF, might want a MIddle IF, top of lineup, vet bat, on a 1/$9 million deal. Low risk. Plus in the offseason, teams think they’re contenders. Looking at you SEA. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see a Jim Johnson-like trade happening right before the non-tender deadline. The O's shouldn't pay Villar $8 million to play on a team that will suck with or without him.

Fans will have real outfielders in Hays, Santander and Stewart to enjoy next season.

The infield will have to wait. Maybe they'll pick up a waiver claim or 12 or a few minor league free agents going into spring training. Hechavarria should be available at some point. He always is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, wildcard said:

But he looks too good to non tender.   Looks more like a tender and trade scenario.   He will probably be very available again this off season.   Elias will have to get creative to trade him.

No one else wants him for the burden of 7 million. He'll be a 2-3 Million FA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Here’s why we tender Villar,

1. He helps out the lineup. Who wants to see Mancini get pitched around?  He helps everyone slot into their correct spots in the lineup.  It takes a lot of pressure of other players.

2. Offseason trade potential. There wasn’t a demand for his skillset at the break. But teams like Clev, Oak, LAA, Cinn, Cubs,  and SF, might want a MIddle IF, top of lineup, vet bat, on a 1/$9 million deal. Low risk. Plus in the offseason, teams think they’re contenders. Looking at you SEA. 

But where are those teams going to play him? If one or more of them need a second baseman, OK. I don't think any team that's in contention, or aspires to be, would play him at SS. I don't think he has much value as a utility guy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Here’s why we tender Villar,

1. He helps out the lineup. Who wants to see Mancini get pitched around?  He helps everyone slot into their correct spots in the lineup.  It takes a lot of pressure of other players.

2. Offseason trade potential. There wasn’t a demand for his skillset at the break. But teams like Clev, Oak, LAA, Cinn, Cubs,  and SF, might want a MIddle IF, top of lineup, vet bat, on a 1/$9 million deal. Low risk. Plus in the offseason, teams think they’re contenders. Looking at you SEA. 

I've been hearing about Villar's trade potential for over a year now, but no one ever seems to be interested in him. I agree that his offensive numbers (on paper) look respectable this season, but there must be something else going on. Maybe teams view him as more of an accumulator with defensive shortcomings on a very bad team? Whatever it is it's enough for me not like the chances of Orioles being able to trade him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, weams said:

No one else wants him for the burden of 7 million. He'll be a 2-3 Million FA.

Agree with this 100%. Someone will take a chance on him for that price, but definitely not $7M. I think if someone's going to give a 2B that kind of money this off season it's going to be Scooter Gennett. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, wildbillhiccup said:

I've been hearing about Villar's trade potential for over a year now, but no one ever seems to be interested in him. I agree that his offensive numbers (on paper) look respectable this season, but there must be something else going on. Maybe teams view him as more of an accumulator with defensive shortcomings on a very bad team? Whatever it is it's enough for me not like the chances of Orioles being able to trade him. 

Villar is a "'good bad player" as he looks good on the current Orioles, but would be a role a player on a legit playoff team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

Villar is a "'good bad player" as he looks good on the current Orioles, but would be a role a player on a legit playoff team. 

Villar is a 2.5-win player, on pace for 3+.  There can't have been five teams in MLB history who had 3-win players at every position.  There may have been none.  An average 90+ win team has multiple positions where they're below-average.

The '27 Yankees gave about 1000 PAs and 450 innings to below-average players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • Yeah the amenities are pretty outdated at the yard and they seem to do nothing year over year to improve them. The touchscreens have been banged on to death to the point they barely function, so you can't accurately fill out your order at the kiosks, and they don't have a way for the people behind the counter to ring you up at many of the food places. The sound is low to non-existent in certain sections of the club level, like around 218. Seems like there should be speakers that reach there but they might have been damaged by rain, etc. and they are too lazy to fix them. If you go to a game that's even slightly busy, you will wait forever to get into the bathroom, and the sink will be an absolute mess with no soap or paper towels. It's even worse on the club level where they have one sink that's right by the door. Nearby businesses don't care, either. The Hilton parking garage reeks of decay, pot and human waste. They don't turn on the air circulation fans, even if cars are waiting for an hour and a half to exit from P3, filling up the air with carbon monoxide. They only let you enter the stadium with one 20 oz bottle of water. It's so expensive to buy a drink or water in the stadium, but with all the salty food, 20 oz of water isn't enough, especially on a hot day. Vegetarian food options are poor to none, other than things like chips, fries, hot pretzels and the occasional pizza. Vida Taco is better, but at an inconvenient location for many seats. The doors on the club level are not accessible. They're anti-accessible. Big, heavy doors you have to go through to get to/from the escalators, and big, heavy doors to get to your seats, none of them automatic (or even with the option to be automatic with a button press). Makes it hard to carry food out to your seats even if not handicapped. The furniture in the lounges on the club level seem designed to allow as few people as possible to sit down. Not great when we have so many rain delays during the season. Should put more, smaller chairs in and allow more of the club level ticket holders to have a seat while waiting for thunderstorms to pass. They keep a lot of the entrance/exit gates closed except for playoff/sellout games, which means people have to slowly "mooooo" all the way down Eutaw St to get to parking. They are too cheap to staff all the gates, so they make people exit by the warehouse, even though it would be a lot more convenient for many fans to open all the gates. Taking Light Rail would be super convenient, except that if there's at least 20k fans in attendance, it's common to have to wait 90-120 minutes to be able to board a non-full train heading toward Glen Burnie. A few trains might come by, but they are already full, or fill up fast when folks walk up to the Convention Center stop to pre-empt the folks trying to board at Camden Station. None of the garages in the area are set up to require pre-payment on entry (reservation, or give them your card / digital payment at the entrance till). If they were, emptying out the garage would be very quick, as they wouldn't need to ticket anyone on the way out: if you can't get in without paying, you can always just leave without having to stop and scan your phone or put a ticket in the machine. They shut down the Sports Legends Museum at Camden Station in 2015 because the Maryland Stadium Authority was too greedy. That place was a fun distraction if you were in the area when a game wasn't about to start, like if you show up super early on Opening Day or a playoff day. Superbook's restaurant on Eutaw is a huge downgrade from Dempsey's in terms of menu and service quality. Dempsey's used to be well-staffed, you could reserve a table online, and they had all kinds of great selection for every diet. Superbook seems like just another bar serving the same swill that the rest of the park serves, with extremely minimal and low-quality food. For that matter, most of the food at the stadium is very low quality these days. A lot of things we used to love are made to a lower standard now if they are served at all. These are gripes about the stadium and the area that haven't changed my entire adult life. Going to an O's game requires one to tolerate many small inconveniences and several major inconveniences, any number of which could easily be fixed by the relevant authorities if they gave a damn about the people who pay to come see the team play. You would think a mid-market team would be able to afford to invest in the fan experience. You would think the city and partnering organizations like garages, the Stadium Authority and MTA would at least try to do their part to make the experience enjoyable and free of kinks. You would think they would put some thought into handling the "growing pains" of the fanbase due to recent renewed interest after the dark years. Instead, all we get is the same indifference and the same annoyances year in and year out. The whole area is overdue for a revamp. Not sure if $600 mil will get it done, but at least it's a start. Hopefully they can start to patch up some of the many holes in the fan experience. If you're not going to invest in Burnes, at least make it so paying customers have an easier, more enjoyable time getting to/from the stadium and having some food while we're there.
    • Elias has only been in rebuild mode with the O's so there's not much to speculate on there.  Houston, where he spent his formative years, doesn't seem to like to be on the hook for more than a couple of big long-term contracts at any given time.  I can see that as being Elias' choice as well, albeit with a lower overall cost - Houston runs a big payroll.  But it's all guesswork.  I really don't know. If Elias takes the 2025 payroll to $150 million it will creep up to $200 million or so by 2028 just from keeping the core together.  That's where I start to wonder about sustainability due to market size, economic forces, etc., etc., etc... If it were up to me, I would add a couple of free agents this offseason even if the contracts were longer than ideal and be conservative about extensions elsewhere until the prospects establish themselves a little better.  I think there's a competitive opportunity that the team is already into that's worth exploiting. I think ownership is very happy to have Elias on board and they're not inclined to force him to do anything.  I also think Rubenstein's demonstrated business prowess is great enough to assume that he has had plenty enough time to come to a mutual understanding with Elias as to goals.
    • We need a RH O’hearn…in addition to Westburg. At least 3 batters that will push up the pitch count and cause damage in the top 5 of the lineup.
    • Boy,  that Jackson Merrill is a good young player that is playing his best ball down the season stretch and in the playoffs.   He's only 21.  I guess some young guys are able to play up to the pressure.   Who could have guessed that?
    • I’m aware.   You are arguing something im Not.
    • What agreement? The agreement you are talking about happened as a result of the move.  The MASN agreement would not have existed if Angelos had gone to court to block the move.
    • I’m saying the Os had an agreement with MLB and that should have held up.  Been pretty clear about that. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...