Jump to content

Diaz does not need to be protected from the Rule 5 draft


wildcard

Recommended Posts

According to Roch:

Quote

A team official said outfielder Yusniel Diaz doesn’t need to be protected because he “gets a fifth year.”

https://www.masnsports.com/school-of-roch/2019/09/more-work-to-be-done-after-orioles-conclude-season.html

This is a change from what I thought before. The rule states:

(A club has 5 years to evaluate a player who signs his first pro contract at 18 years old or younger, but only 4 years to decide on a player who signs at age 19.)

Diaz was born on October 7 1996.   His signing by the Dodgers was announced on November 22, 2015.   That would have made him 19.  But the announcement did say he was 18.   He must have been sign before October 7, 2015  and the announcement came later.

Here is the announcement:

https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2015/11/dodgers-sign-yusniel-diaz.html

If Diaz does get another year that  gives the O's another spot on the 40 man roster this fall to work with.

 

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So based on the previous thread on the subject, and the fangraphs website, this appears to be a list, as complete as I can make it, of the guys we have who are Rule 5 eligible in December:

Keegan Akin
Christian Alvarado
Martin Cervenka
Tanner Chlerobad
Brett Cumberland
Seamus Curran
Mathias Dietz
Tyler Erwin
Jaylen Ferguson
Gray Fenter
Jay Flaa
Luis Gonzalez
Bryan Gonzalez
Dean Kremer
Ryan McKenna

Kirvin Moesquit
Ryan Mountcastle
Zack Muckenhirn
Preston Palmeiro
Ofelky Peralta
Luis Perez
Jomar Reyes
Ademar Rifaela
Cody Sedlock
Chandler Shepherd
Nick Vespi

To me, there were 5 no-doubt obvious protects who have to be moved to the 40 man roster.   After that, there are a few others that you can certainly make a case for,  but not sure things in my opinion.

Certainly we have enough dead weight on the 40 man to easily make room for 5 of these guys.   Probably more.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would definitely protect Gray Fenter.  If left unprotected some organization will surely draft him and try to stash him in the bullpen.  He has battled back from TJ surgery and is now showing why the O's drafted him out of high school as a million dollar bonus baby.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, rudyrooster said:

I would definitely protect Gray Fenter.  If left unprotected some organization will surely draft him and try to stash him in the bullpen.  He has battled back from TJ surgery and is now showing why the O's drafted him out of high school as a million dollar bonus baby.

The jump from Delmarva to MLB is almost as big as it gets. I think he may go undrafted if left off. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, oriole said:

The jump from Delmarva to MLB is almost as big as it gets. I think he may go undrafted if left off. 

He probably wouldn't get drafted, but stranger things have happened. Last year the Blue Jays took 19-year-old Elvis Luciano, who hadn't pitched above rookie ball, in the Rule 5 draft. And he even held his own in the majors with a 5.35 ERA in 25 games. I could see a scenario where a rebuilding club takes a chance on drafting Fenter.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SteveA said:

So based on the previous thread on the subject, and the fangraphs website, this appears to be a list, as complete as I can make it, of the guys we have who are Rule 5 eligible in December:

Keegan Akin
Christian Alvarado
Martin Cervenka
Tanner Chlerobad
Brett Cumberland
Seamus Curran
Mathias Dietz
Tyler Erwin
Jaylen Ferguson
Gray Fenter
Jay Flaa
Luis Gonzalez
Bryan Gonzalez
Dean Kremer
Ryan McKenna

Kirvin Moesquit
Ryan Mountcastle
Zack Muckenhirn
Preston Palmeiro
Ofelky Peralta
Luis Perez
Jomar Reyes
Ademar Rifaela
Cody Sedlock
Chandler Shepherd
Nick Vespi

To me, there were 5 no-doubt obvious protects who have to be moved to the 40 man roster.   After that, there are a few others that you can certainly make a case for,  but not sure things in my opinion.

Certainly we have enough dead weight on the 40 man to easily make room for 5 of these guys.   Probably more.

Now, there are easily ten players I could take off the current roster to make room for players but I don't think Sedlock and McKenna are no-brainers.

Akin, Kremer and Mountcastle are the no brainers...

Mckenna, Fenter, Klimek (who you don't have) and Sedlock are the next level to consider.

Alvarado, Cumberland and Muickenhirm are the only others I'd give any consideration to.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

Now, there are easily ten players I could take off the current roster to make room for players but I don't think Sedlock and McKenna are no-brainers.

Akin, Kremer and Mountcastle are the no brainers...

Mckenna, Fenter, Klimek (who you don't have) and Sedlock are the next level to consider.

Alvarado, Cumberland and Muickenhirm are the only others I'd give any consideration to.

I could see Muckinhirn not being protected or drafted, having a good spring, starting off pretty good in Norfolk and getting to Baltimore in May.

I don't see the hype in Cumberland. He has been projected as a "bat first" catcher who should be moved from behind the plate, as his durability seems to be an issue (almost like he caught the Susac bug.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, NCRaven said:

It sucks to be a 22 year old prospect.  Now they'll keep him in AAA all of 2020 and through the first  couple of weeks of 2021 (depending on how the new CBA is expected to look with relation to service time).

I’m not sure the roster will be handled the same next year as this year. I could see a number of scenarios where Diaz gets called up. For one, I think about mid season it will make sense to have talent learning how to win together. 

Anyway I hope so. I’d like to start seeing interesting guys like Diaz and some of this years AA pitchers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, SteveA said:

So based on the previous thread on the subject, and the fangraphs website, this appears to be a list, as complete as I can make it, of the guys we have who are Rule 5 eligible in December:

Keegan Akin
Christian Alvarado
Martin Cervenka
Tanner Chlerobad
Brett Cumberland
Seamus Curran
Mathias Dietz
Tyler Erwin
Jaylen Ferguson
Gray Fenter
Jay Flaa
Luis Gonzalez
Bryan Gonzalez
Dean Kremer
Ryan McKenna

Kirvin Moesquit
Ryan Mountcastle
Zack Muckenhirn
Preston Palmeiro
Ofelky Peralta
Luis Perez
Jomar Reyes
Ademar Rifaela
Cody Sedlock
Chandler Shepherd
Nick Vespi

To me, there were 5 no-doubt obvious protects who have to be moved to the 40 man roster.   After that, there are a few others that you can certainly make a case for,  but not sure things in my opinion.

Certainly we have enough dead weight on the 40 man to easily make room for 5 of these guys.   Probably more.

Why is Chandler Shepherd Rule 5 eligible considering he’s already debuted?

He’s going to be gone anyway

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Just to be clear, though, fWAR also includes a substantial adjustment for position, including a negative one for Cowser.  For a clearer example on that front, as the chart posted higher on this page indicates, Carlos Santana had a +14 OAA — which is the source data that fWAR’s defensive component is based on. That 14 outs above average equates to 11-12 (they use different values on this for some reason) runs better than the average 1B.  So does Santana have a 12.0 defensive value, per fWAR? He does not. That’s because they adjust his defensive value downward to reflect that he’s playing a less difficult/valuable position. In this case, that adjustment comes out to -11.0 runs, as you can see here:   So despite apparently having a bona fide Gold Glove season, Santana’s Fielding Runs value (FanGraphs’ equivalent to dWAR) is barely above average, at 1.1 runs.    Any good WAR calculation is going to adjust for position. Being a good 1B just isn’t worth as much as being an average SS or catcher. Just as being a good LF isn’t worth as much as being an average CF. Every outfielder can play LF — only the best outfielders can play CF.  Where the nuance/context shows up here is with Cowser’s unique situation. Playing LF in OPACY, with all that ground to cover, is not the same as playing LF at Fenway or Yankee Stadium. Treating Cowser’s “position” as equivalent to Tyler O’Neill’s, for example, is not fair. The degree of difficulty is much, much higher at OPACY’s LF, and so the adjustment seems out of whack for him. That’s the one place where I’d say the bWAR value is “unfair” to Cowser.
    • Wait a second here, the reason he's -0.1 in bb-ref dwar is because they're using drs to track his defensive run value.  He's worth 6.6 runs in defense according to fangraphs, which includes adjustments for position, which would give him a fangraphs defensive war of +0.7.
    • A little funny to have provided descriptions of the hits (“weak” single; “500 foot” HR). FIP doesn’t care about any of that either, so it’s kind of an odd thing to add in an effort to make ERA look bad.  Come in, strike out the first hitter, then give up three 108 MPH rocket doubles off the wall. FIP thinks you were absolutely outstanding, and it’s a shame your pathetic defense and/or sheer bad luck let you down. Next time you’ll (probably) get the outcomes you deserve. They’re both flawed. So is xFIP. So is SIERA. So is RA/9. So is WPA. So is xERA. None of them are perfect measures of how a pitcher’s actual performance was, because there’s way too much context and too many variables for any one metric to really encompass.  But when I’m thinking about awards, for me at least, it ends up having to be about the actual outcomes. I don’t really care what a hitter’s xWOBA is when I’m thinking about MVP, and the same is true for pitchers. Did you get the outs? Did the runs score? That’s the “value” that translates to the scoreboard and, ultimately, to the standings. So I think the B-R side of it is more sensible for awards.  I definitely take into account the types of factors that you (and other pitching fWAR advocates) reference as flaws. So if a guy plays in front of a particular bad defense or had a particularly high percentage of inherited runners score, I’d absolutely adjust my take to incorporate that info. And I also 100% go to Fangraphs first when I’m trying to figure out which pitchers we should acquire (i.e., for forward looking purposes).  But I just can’t bring myself say that my Cy Young is just whichever guy had the best ratio of Ks to BBs to HRs over a threshold number of innings. As @Frobby said, it just distills out too much of what actually happened.
    • We were all a lot younger in 2005.  No one wanted to believe Canseco cause he’s a smarmy guy. Like I said, he was the only one telling the truth. It wasn’t a leap of faith to see McGwire up there and Sosa up there and think “yeah, those guys were juicing” but then suddenly look at Raffy and think he was completely innocent.  It’s a sad story. The guy should be in Hall of Fame yet 500 homers and 3,000 hits are gone like a fart in the wind cause his legacy is wagging his finger and thinking he couldn’t get caught.  Don’t fly too close to the sun.  
    • I think if we get the fun sprinkler loving Gunnar that was in the dugout yesterday, I don’t think we have to worry about him pressing. He seemed loose and feeling good with the other guys he was with, like Kremer.
    • I was a lot younger back then, but that betrayal hit really hard because he had been painting himself as literally holier than thou, and shook his finger to a congressional committee and then barely 2 weeks later failed the test.
    • Not bad, but Mullins needs to be at Centerfield for his range, glove, and defensive ability. Top teir premium defense cannot be underestimated. Kjerstad will be on the bench. I think the question is whether Slater or Cowser plays. I would prefer Ramirez over Slater if they need another right handed bat. Sig needs to look at Adleys recent sample sizes vs LHP before making him DH. McCann is catching for Burnes and hitting the left handed pitcher. He's also on a hot streak.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...