Jump to content

MiLB agrees to contract


weams

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, weams said:

 

I didn't like it then.   Don't like it now.    In particular, the first leagues to go appear to be historic leagues that are in Appalachia and the Pioneer League in Utah, Colorado, Montana, Idaho... But we shall see what happens.   Certainly now, many  minor league teams may indeed go under, many more than this contraction seeks.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

They should swap Frederick with Bowie. Make Frederick Double-A and let Bowie take their 1990 ballpark to an independent league. Can't even get to Bowie during the week because of traffic anyways! 

It seems so odd to get rid of the Keys.  They lead the Carolina League in attendance practically every year, pretty nice ballpark, great city.  It doesn’t make sense.  Get rid of Bowie or Norfolk.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

They should swap Frederick with Bowie. Make Frederick Double-A and let Bowie take their 1990 ballpark to an independent league. Can't even get to Bowie during the week because of traffic anyways! 

This.  It's bad enough they're killing teams but the Keys are well supported and the stadium/area is good for baseball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ArtVanDelay said:

It seems so odd to get rid of the Keys.  They lead the Carolina League in attendance practically every year, pretty nice ballpark, great city.  It doesn’t make sense.  Get rid of Bowie or Norfolk.

Norfolk is a great stadium and does pretty well overall. Sure it would be nicer to have the AAA team closer, but Norfolk deserves to keep an affiliated team. Heck, I'd like to see Aberdeen bumped to full season status. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Ripken said:

This.  It's bad enough they're killing teams but the Keys are well supported and the stadium/area is good for baseball.

Agreed, Frederick should not lose it's affiliated team. The Orioles also don't want to start losing that areas to the Nats.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tony-OH said:

Agreed, Frederick should not lose it's affiliated team. The Orioles also don't want to start losing that areas to the Nats.

I think this is a really good point. Frederick is almost a DC suburb because of I-270. Losing the Keys would be another blow to the Orioles rapidly decreasing territory. I mean, even Columbia is starting to turn into Nats country.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

Norfolk is a great stadium and does pretty well overall. Sure it would be nicer to have the AAA team closer, but Norfolk deserves to keep an affiliated team. Heck, I'd like to see Aberdeen bumped to full season status. 

Reading that all short season teams would be eliminated, first thing I thought was Cal must be very unhappy about this news.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Saint Paul Saints (and Sugar Land Skeeters) are going to become affiliated teams.  What the...  The Saint Paul Saints were an original indy league team, in that first wave of early 1990s indy leagues.  The first unaffiliated teams since the 1950s  They are owned by Mike Veeck, who has his father's penchant for thumbing his nose at the establishment.  Of course Bill Murray is a minority owner.  They revel in doing unusual, weird, off-the-wall stuff.  They originated a lot of the crazy minor league promotions that now everyone copies.  The fanbase loves the fact that they're Saints fans and not Twins fans.

Now they're going to be just another affiliated team.  I'd bet they're probably going to be affiliated with the Twins.  Nobody will give two craps about their pennant race, and if the Twins needs their cleanup hitter to play third base for a month while Miguel Sano is on the IL, there goes their cleanup hitter. But it won't matter, because nobody cares about their fake affiliated-league pennant race anyway.

This is like Jerry Garcia going to work as a mid-level manager for IBM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

For MiLB owners, the biggest desires in the negotiations are long-term security (avoiding a repeat of this difficult PBA negotiation in a few years), an assurance that their franchise values will be protected and a plan that provides as many cities and teams as possible a viable path forward.

Such a desire may lead MiLB teams to agree to a plan which would allow MLB to take over control of the governance of the minors, a possibility Ballpark Digest first reported last week.

If that happens, it would allow MLB to exert more direct control over all aspects of the minors, eliminating some of the governance issues that have bothered MLB in the past. Some MiLB owners have privately said that they find such a proposal appealing if it means that it gives them long-term security under the protection of MLB’s umbrella. No such proposal has yet been floated.

In the beginning minor leagues were just like the major leagues, only with fewer resources, often in smaller cities, not signing players that were quite as good. 

Starting around 1920 MLB teams started buying up minor league teams, and/or getting them to agree to sell any of their players to the MLB team for a fixed price.  Teams gave up their status as independent entities trying their best to win for the security of a fixed revenue stream.

By the 1950s that had evolved to most MiLB teams being direct affiliates of a MLB team, with little or no control over who played for them or who got called up.  But the minor leagues still had some semblance of their own governance and negotiated with MLB for conditions of their servitude.

Under this new agreement it now looks like MLB will more-or-less directly control the affiliated minors, and apparently have some influence over the indy leagues.  When they say "eliminating some of the governance issues that have bothered MLB in the past" what they really mean is they can eliminate minor league representatives annoying them with demands in negotiations.  MLB will say jump, and instead of there being a slight delay and maybe some concessions on what the MiLB teams will get for their jump, they'll just jump.

Consolidation of power by exploiting a crisis is kind of crappy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

They should swap Frederick with Bowie. Make Frederick Double-A and let Bowie take their 1990 ballpark to an independent league. Can't even get to Bowie during the week because of traffic anyways! 

I love Bowie, and not sure why you have trouble getting to Bowie, its pretty convenient off 2 major roads and toss in 197 as another smaller road to get there.

The stadium is great, not a bad seat in the house, parking is close and free, usually always a breeze as it backs up against a good set of trees

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Redskins Rick said:

I love Bowie, and not sure why you have trouble getting to Bowie, its pretty convenient off 2 major roads and toss in 197 as another smaller road to get there.

The stadium is great, not a bad seat in the house, parking is close and free, usually always a breeze as it backs up against a good set of trees

 

Well that's certainly an opinion, but if you think the stadium is great, you have not seen what a lot of Double-A level stadiums look like now. If you think there is always a breeze you haven't sat behind homeplate on a summer Sunday afternoon. If you think it's easy to get to during a week, you don't come down rt 3 from the north between 5:30 and 7:00 and even worse, don't have to spend the 15 minutes going from the rt 50 overpass to the Stadium road entrance as you wait in the dual unsychronized lights multiple times each.

Everyone likes what they like though. Saying that, I don't necessarily want to see Bowie lose their team, but I'd not prefer to see the Orioles lose an affiliate in Frederick even more. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • It can’t hurt to do research on him and place a call to Cards GM & see what’s involved . We need SP help . 
    • Here is my roster. Wasn't an easy task with some tough decisions C  Adley Rutschmann 2022 1B Rafaeil Palmeiro 1998 2B Brian Roberts 2009 SS Miguel Tejada 2006 3B Manny Machado 2015 OF Adam Jones 2015 OF Albert Belle 1999 OF Trey Mancini 2017 DH Chris Davis 2013          Bench Gunnar Henderson 2024 Bench Melvin Mora 2004 Bench Jay Gibbons 2003 Bench Matt Wieters 2011 --------------------- SP Mike Mussina 2000 SP Jason Johnson 2001 SP Wei-Yen Chen    2014 SP Erik Bedard 2007 SP John Means 2019          RP Jorge Julio 2002 RP BJ Ryan 2005 RP Jim Johnson 2012 RP Koji Uehara    2010 RP Zack Britton    2016 RP Felix Bautista 2023 RP Darren O'Day    2014 RP George Sherril 2008  
    • You must choose a 26-man roster from 26 seasons. Here are the rules. Ignore 2020 Select 13 position players, with 9 starters and 4 bench players Select 13 pitchers, with 5 starters and 8 relievers You can only select one player from each season from 1998-2024 (exclude 2020) You can only select a given player ONCE  Starting pitchers have to be starting pitchers, relievers have to be relievers I will amend rules as appropriate from any suggestions you have. Go. 
    • Now being reported on MLB Network in middle of Braves-Mets postgame wrapup.
    • Adley's teams have beaten Witt's teams by about 25 games/season the last 2 years and hopefully can maintain a lead the next 2-3 days. If McCann bats 9th, and Ragans is gone before Batter Faced #27, would the risk of forfeiting the DH be considered if a righty reliever is attacking McCann in a key spot?    Hyde has at least Kjerstad and Holliday on the bench, and maybe one of Mullins or Cowser if Slater starts. I am guessing the roster tomorrow will be 14 bats and 12 arms, so you might have one extra somebody for the team's 36th or 45th plate appearance. One factor against taking the chance...zombie runner is gone so the two teams could have long extra innings for the first time all year.
    • Not sure if it’s been shared already, but saw this and thought he would totally make sense as someone to target in the offseason. Cardinals are looking to reduce payroll, though not sure what a reasonable offer looks like for a 35 year old pitcher making 25 million a year for the next two years. A very light free agent class this year. Someone will definitely overpay for Burnes and I hope it’s not the Orioles. Severino, Buehler, Bieber and Max Fried are also intriguing. What say you? https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2024/09/report-cardinals-open-to-offers-on-sonny-gray.html
    • I was looking that up too. He was in the bullpen throughout 2018 brewers run. Had a very solid first playoff start in 2021, then a not so good one in 2023 as you posted. Postseason is a different animal, and he’s got some experience, but he’s not proven in the playoffs. Time to make that money Corbin! 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...