Jump to content

Is the 30 man roster set?


wildcard

Recommended Posts

51 minutes ago, wildcard said:

I have not heard that Means will not pitch on opening day yet.   He could pitch a side session and they determine  he is a go for OD  or not.    Kohl Stewart's start on Tuesday is big for him.  It could determine if he makes the team or is optioned. 

Eshelman and/or Valdez may be in consideration to be added to the team to either add a starter or to add length in the pen depending on how Means and Stewart do.

Wynns, Urias and/or  Hector Velazquez could be DFA's if the O's need room on the 40 man roster.  There are currently 39 on the 40 man roster.   If a player is DFA'd from the 40 man roster and clears waivers he can still remain on the 60 man roster.

Valiaka appears to be earning a spot on the bench and he is not on the 40 man.  Wilkerson injury could get him sent to Bowie if he is not ready for OD.  No IL stay required since he is non rostered.

Herrera is playing well but is still on the outside looking in.   He could be an injury replacement if needed but otherwise he goes to Bowie.    Mountcastle's ability to hit and play both 1B and LF duplicates what Herrera does  and could affect Herrera being added to the 40 man  roster.   O's would not want to add Herrera and then have to DFA someone to add Mountcastle in a week.

All comments are JMO.

I’m not saying he will not, I just don’t know why other than the prestige of starting on Opening Day you would want to push Means. I hope he is fine and ready to go, not saying that. 

Either way I just can’t see them not keeping Eshelman at this point. He is stretched out and ready to go. 

7 hours ago, Legend_Of_Joey said:

I think to start, they will. Just a matter of Wynns or Holoday, probably.

I wonder if they see him as someone that can be an “opener,” spot start, or long man role?

If they do keep 3 catchers and keep 16 arms I think the bench is Sisco, Wynns/Holaday- my guess Wynns, Velazquez, Valiaka and Mullins. 

We know many of these guys are not players you fret over getting claimed if they are let go. I know some of these guys need to be added to the 40 man but that should not be an issue. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Legend_Of_Joey said:

I wonder if they see him as someone that can be an “opener,” spot start, or long man role?

I'm curious how he would do as the the guy who follows the opener.  Say you had someone like Tanner Scott throwing 97 pitch the first two innings and then bring in Eshelman only throwing 86 to face the bottom of the lineup and the next turn through 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, bpilktree said:

I don’t see why you would carry three catchers especially when you also have to carry one on the taxi squad.  I can’t see any reason to have 4 guys of the 30+ to be catchers.

 

8 minutes ago, Redskins Rick said:

Very True

Maybe they don’t consider Sisco as a good option behind the plate?

Or, incase something like what happened in Kansas City happens where the starter and backup test positive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Legend_Of_Joey said:

 

Maybe they don’t consider Sisco as a good option behind the plate?

Or, incase something like what happened in Kansas City happens where the starter and backup test positive.

I dont consider Sisco a good option behind the plate.

Only 1 DH, and too many options.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Lucky_13 said:

I'm curious how he would do as the the guy who follows the opener.  Say you had someone like Tanner Scott throwing 97 pitch the first two innings and then bring in Eshelman only throwing 86 to face the bottom of the lineup and the next turn through 

Heat to a slow throwing, is a good way to disrupt the batter's timing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Redskins Rick said:

Heat to a slow throwing, is a good way to disrupt the batter's timing.

Is it?

Has anyone ever checked to see if this is actually true or just something that gets tossed around as a fact?

I don't mean in the context of one plate appearance, I mean as is presented here, one pitcher throwing hard for the first six batters and another pitcher throwing slower following him.

Does it make the second pitcher more effective? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Is it?

Has anyone ever checked to see if this is actually true or just something that gets tossed around as a fact?

I don't mean in the context of one plate appearance, I mean as is presented here, one pitcher throwing hard for the first six batters and another pitcher throwing slower following him.

Does it make the second pitcher more effective? 

Stevie threw a top speed of 55 mph. Seemed to mess with the timing pretty well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

Is it?

Has anyone ever checked to see if this is actually true or just something that gets tossed around as a fact?

I don't mean in the context of one plate appearance, I mean as is presented here, one pitcher throwing hard for the first six batters and another pitcher throwing slower following him.

Does it make the second pitcher more effective? 

Go back in time, and I remember the Orioles manager, moving his guys around, so heat, didnt throw back to back with heat and vice versa. 

I also remember, Oriole throwing soft tossers like Moyer at somebody and then bringing heat from the pen, and watching them wave at air.

But you are right, if its only six hitters and then pitcher change, really doesnt matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Etzel's playable in CF by all accounts. Just a meteoric rise, As we've seen with Beavers, sustaining a hot start in Bowie can sometimes be a challenge.
    • So last night, 7/3, Julio Rodriguez didn't make the catch on that 2-run double by O'Hearn.  It was a long run, but that looked like it should have been caught.  Then Hayes made a nice diving catch in LF and Santander made that sliding grab in RF.  I was wondering about the catch probability of those plays and where you guys get those stats/ details.  I'm thinking the Rodriquez play was less likely caught than the other two, but Santander might have been close.  I'm trying to get a handle on this stat, because of what was discussed in the last thread (...that I couldn't locate) and the understanding that how spectacular a catch might look might not be a good indicator of probability. My untrained eyes say Rodriguez was most unlikely, followed by Santander, and then Hayes.  I'm probably completely wrong.
    • I thought of it but decided the FCL thread was more relevant. But your more than welcome to.
    • Remember Komi Uehera?  Great splitter. The problem was you have to throw the fastball to set it up. He had an average fastball. The Red Sox did ride him to a WS though. 
    • July 1: Chayce McDermott, 7 IP, 12 K’s July 4: Yeiber Cartaya, 4 IP, 10 K’s.   It’s possible I’ve missed one or two so far.    
    • He is such an interesting case. Obviously the extraordinarily late “breakout” age, but you also just almost never see a true one-pitch pitcher in today’s game. Aside from the splitter, he has no ML-quality pitches. The 4-seam fastball is mediocre at best in velocity for a reliever (94.6 MPH), it’s on the straighter side, and it gets tagged to the tune of a .405 wOBA (with a .400 xWOBA to match). It’s a bottom-tier 4-seamer.  And then he throws a cutter 27% of the time. A cutter which is so bad that I can only imagine Palmer would have a coronary watching him continue to throw it. It is arguably the worst pitch in baseball this season, and over the course of his two ML seasons, hitters are posting a .486 wOBA against it. What’s most shocking is that StatCast suggests he’s been lucky to get that outcome, with a staggering .511 xWOBA on two seasons worth of cutters.    Ah, but then you have that splitter. The gift from God. And it really is, to be honest. This is a dude who would be working some every day job like the rest of us if he didn’t somehow master that splitter. But he did, and now he’s making bank playing a game. So far this season, 81 PAs ending on a splitter. Opponents have 4 hits against it (.056 BA). All those hits have been singles. 53 of those PAs ended with the hitter slinking back to the dugout (a cool 65.1% K rate), and it carries a 58.1% whiff rate. The average EV against the splitter this year is 76.7 MPH. The two-year wOBA on the splitter is .133, with a .137 xWOBA to match. Those are goofy numbers. Those are the numbers my 5-year-old nephew will put up against my best wiffleball arsenal this afternoon.    In sum, really interesting guy. Only having one effective pitch concerns me — on the days when the splitter is not splitting, he’s useless. The splitter has gotten more effective this year, not less, so that does assuage some of my concerns about the league eventually getting the book on him and spitting on the splitter in order to wait for a chance to pulverize the other junk he tosses. But is he a guy you can run out 4-5 times against the same elite hitters in a short span in October? It just seems like they’d have to get a solid feel for him after seeing a few times back to back. But if all it would cost is someone like Billy Cook, there’s really no harm done in finding out. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...