Jump to content

Tracking Ex Oriole Thread


Rene88

Recommended Posts

46 minutes ago, mdbdotcom said:

Over six seasons, Gausman's pitching coaches with the O's included Rick Adair, Bill Castro, Dave Wallace and Roger McDowell. He was jerked around from minors (where he had more pitching coaches) to majors and back again, and was shuttled from the rotation to the bullpen. 

If an organization can't provide consistent instruction and coaching throughout the organization, then the pitcher can't know whose instruction to follow. This needs to be addressed in the rebuild if it hasn't been, already.

A lot can be said for continuity in coaches and instruction throughout an organization. 

Regarding Gausman going forward, a few things to keep in mind:

1.  Left the AL East for the NL

2.  Orioles were a bad defensive team

3.  Braves are a good defensive team

4.  Gausman was pitching well for the Orioles before being traded

5.  Gausman has always pitched a lot better in the second half of the season. 

Admittedly, unless the Orioles sign VVM, I am not sure what the urgency of the trade was. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here are the facts:

He is striking out batters at a lower rate than when he was here.

He is walking batters at about the same rate.

He is allowing fewer hits per 9 innings.........and FAR fewer HR / 9.  This seems to be the root cause of his improved ERA.

So if you think the coaches in ATL have done a great job at teaching him how to have his pitches hit more directly at fielders.........then I think it makes sense to criticize the O's for not doing the same.

Personally I can't quite get there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Uli2001 said:

This is an extremely small sample size. Let's wait a full season before we crown him the next Arrieta.

However, it's well known that leaving the AL immediately improves a pitcher by 1/2 run. Subtract another 1/2 run for leaving the AL East. Perhaps another 1/2 run for leaving the Orioles organization. Then a mediocre 4.0 ERA pitcher all of a sudden is a very good 2.5 ERA one.

 

No, no, no.  Small sample sizes won't prohibit anyone to go off the rails and judge a trade after 30 seconds because they just didn't like it to begin with.  Anything to fit a narrative of being right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Diehard_O's_Fan said:

This makes the Orioles look absolutely dumb if you ask me. It is so frustrating to have guys like Gausman and Arrieta dominate for other teams. I expect Gausman to be a very good pitcher for the Braves. I still cannot believe the Orioles traded him especially for the players they got in return.

He had a whip over 160 most of the year here which means he was pitching from the stretch plenty and wasn't that great.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, bpilktree67 said:

 

He had a whip over 1.60 most of the year here, which means that he was pitching from the stretch plenty, and wasn't that great.  

 

o

 

No, he didn't.

April 23rd was only his 5th start of the season, and his WHIP went down from 1.571 to 1.310 in that game.

After that, his WHIP never went higher than 1.402, and that was on June 9th.

When he left, his WHIP was 1.379.

 

o

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎8‎/‎28‎/‎2018 at 7:30 AM, Aglets said:

Here are the facts:

He is striking out batters at a lower rate than when he was here.

He is walking batters at about the same rate.

He is allowing fewer hits per 9 innings.........and FAR fewer HR / 9.  This seems to be the root cause of his improved ERA.

So if you think the coaches in ATL have done a great job at teaching him how to have his pitches hit more directly at fielders.........then I think it makes sense to criticize the O's for not doing the same.

Personally I can't quite get there.

Re-upping as often as people continue to ignore it and make claims that fly in the face of the data.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gausman's not only doing well in Atlanta. They're calling him their stopper. 

https://www.mlb.com/news/kevin-gausman-bullpen-shut-out-marlins/c-292020178

Part of the issue I (and some others) have with dismissing Gausman... People knocked his mental game a lot. I heard this was who he was, countless times. I never heard: "This is who he is, but he'll be great somewhere else." Many people here devalued his talents, because they were understandably frustrated with his lack of consistency at times. But I think they were wrong to conflate his results with his talent. 

And now that he's actually dominating with Atlanta, yes... those of us who were big KG fans are nodding our heads a bit. This is what we expected. If he was sucking wind in Atlanta, you'd be nodding your head, and we'd be talking about small sample sizes, adjusting to a new league, etc. That's just the way it goes. 

I still hope Juan Carlos Encarnacion will surprise and become an upper-tier third baseman for us... But I think we got the worst of this deal. (I graded it a D, I believe, at the time. I would upgrade that to a B- if we get two MLB contributors out of it, plus sign VVM and his brother... regardless of how Gausman performs.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SSS but Manny is showing he's still an elite 3B... but perhaps just as importantly, he's apparently improved his defense at SS too.  He's now at -8.8 UZR/150 after leaving the O's at -11.9.  And he's got a bunch of good defensive plays on the Dodgers highlight feed.

Makes me wonder if he was sandbagging a little bit on defense with the O's, since we are terrible and he doesn't want to get hurt for a terrible team in a contract year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Hallas said:

SSS but Manny is showing he's still an elite 3B... but perhaps just as importantly, he's apparently improved his defense at SS too.  He's now at -8.8 UZR/150 after leaving the O's at -11.9.  And he's got a bunch of good defensive plays on the Dodgers highlight feed.

Makes me wonder if he was sandbagging a little bit on defense with the O's, since we are terrible and he doesn't want to get hurt for a terrible team in a contract year.

They just coached him up.

 

On a more serious note Manny was bad at SS before the O's were a confirmed bad club.  It appeared to me that his defense had already started trending up before the trade.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

They just coached him up.

 

On a more serious note Manny was bad at SS before the O's were a confirmed bad club.  It appeared to me that his defense had already started trending up before the trade.

I thought it was trending up but it was more of a "better than terrible" trending up, rather than actual above-average.  His UZR/150 is +6.2 at SS with the Dodgers.

edit to add: When he wasn't playing for a terrible team in 2016, he was slightly above average at SS while covering for Hardy.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • We do not have to give up Holliday, Basallo, or Mayo to get what we need.
    • So you think Elias will give up one of the top 3 prospects to get upgrades?
    • “Dramatics”? That’s an interesting way of framing my opinion. I promise you I am as calm and cool as a cucumber. There’s no “dramatics” going on here. As you know, numbers fluctuate during any given period of time in the season. Good/great players have bad/cold stretches and bad/terrible players have good stretches. IMO we do not possess the type of top end talent at the back end of the bullpen needed to win multiple rounds against the best opposition in October.  If you are confident in Cano/Kimbrel or worse in Vespi/Baker/Perez/etc getting Soto and Judge out in a big spot late in the game in Yankee stadium in October, that is fine. I am not.  Just as an observer of baseball, Holmes is a much better pitcher than any reliever that we have. I would be much more confident in his talent than any reliever that we have. Now if we had Felix that would be one thing. But this season we do not. And I would hate for a team as good as ours to be held back by not making the needed/necessary move(s) before we get into October.  IMO we did that last season (with the starting pitching) and it didn’t end well. And I acknowledge that everybody doesn’t think like me nor have the same championship expectations/aspirations. Some fans/posters here have stated as much and that they are happy if we have a winning team year after year or if we just make it into the tournament year after year, regardless of results when we get there. And that’s fine. That’s just not my desired outcome. The great thing about this board is that we don’t have to agree and are able to express our opinions.
    • That’s right. Great times are here and more ahead with this group. 
    • Over/under on the number of times we walk Judge and Soto in this series?   10?  Nobody else really worries me.  
    • 2 days in a row we got some help from the RedSox
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...