Jump to content

Tracking Ex Oriole Thread


Rene88

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, TonySoprano said:

Completely missing the point.  Dismissed as a "league average hitter" which he could very well be, but that's something the Orioles are sorely lacking.  TEAM OPS+ 85

Which corner OF on our roster is Yaz better than? I agree he would be an upgrade over Davis, Richie, and Rio.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good for Yaz. I wish him well. Significant injuries cost him in Baltimore. I think he was a better player than Rickard, offensively and defensively. I don’t think he’s the hitter that Dwight Smith Jr. has been, but Yaz is a better defender.

He probably should have gotten an opportunity at some point last year. 40 man spots were a bit scarce due to the pitching woes, but they should have found a way. Good to see him doing well, but then Yaz won’t be facing the Yankees, Red Sox and Rays 57 games a season. The AL East is a different arena than the NL West. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Who are you going to cut so that the 28-year-old corner OF with the .780 minor league OPS could play?  26-year-old Dwight Smith? 

Joey Rickard, 28 year old, career minor league OPS .783, but we gave him 118 ABs this year.   End result was the same.
https://www.baseball-reference.com/register/player.fcgi?id=rickar000joe

 

Feel like we're having the OH equivalent of the "Four Yorkshiremen" sketch

"He's a league average hitter."

League average?  So lucky.  He'd be Babe Ruth on this team.  We're paying $23M a year for a first baseman who can't hit his way out of a wet cardboard box.

"$23M?  Who would've thought 30 years ago we'd have a $23M man on the payroll?  That's about what TB paid for their entire payroll in 2018."
 


 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Oriole1940 said:

If ever there was a textbook example  of SECOND GUESSING, this is it.  Must be a slow day on the board.  Oh, late game. 

 

 I don’t think the concerns that are being raised are purely hindsight. Everybody makes mistakes, and we’re not even sure that this was a mistake. Maybe it wasn’t.. But we have reason to be concerned if this reflects a lack of Talent recognition. Because we don’t want to let somebody go unless were sure that he’s nothing.

I strongly feel Mike should’ve been brought up last September, but the people who declined to do so are gone,  and releasing him, or releasing anybody, is always a calculated risk. If he’s hitting this well after 600 at bats instead of only 90, maybe we can look at our process to see what we did wrong. Until then, wish him well,  let’s find something more pertinent to argue about. 

We already determined that the best beetle was Paul, So I’m welcome to suggestions…

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Philip said:

 I don’t think the concerns that are being raised are purely hindsight. Everybody makes mistakes, and we’re not even sure that this was a mistake. Maybe it wasn’t.. But we have reason to be concerned if this reflects a lack of Talent recognition. Because we don’t want to let somebody go unless were sure that he’s nothing.

I strongly feel Mike should’ve been brought up last September, but the people who declined to do so are gone,  and releasing him, or releasing anybody, is always a calculated risk. If he’s hitting this well after 600 at bats instead of only 90, maybe we can look at our process to see what we did wrong. Until then, wish him well,  let’s find something more pertinent to argue about. 

We already determined that the best beetle was Paul, So I’m welcome to suggestions…

I'm partial to:

Nightwish-beetle.png?auto=compress&fit=c

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TonySoprano said:

Joey Rickard, 28 year old, career minor league OPS .783, but we gave him 118 ABs this year.   End result was the same.
https://www.baseball-reference.com/register/player.fcgi?id=rickar000joe

 

Feel like we're having the OH equivalent of the "Four Yorkshiremen" sketch

"He's a league average hitter."

League average?  So lucky.  He'd be Babe Ruth on this team.  We're paying $23M a year for a first baseman who can't hit his way out of a wet cardboard box.

"$23M?  Who would've thought 30 years ago we'd have a $23M man on the payroll?  That's about what TB paid for their entire payroll in 2018."
 


 

Sure, why not, let's rearrange the deck chairs and give little Yaz his major league shot. We'll cut a .780 AAA OPS guy and call up another because why not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Britt got the Manny interview. If you have a subscription to the Athletic, it’s worth your time. Manny reflects on the emotions of returning to Baltimore and the lack of love he felt from management because they didn’t talk to him about an extension after they said they’d call. Manny also says that it was a common theme with the organization because Nick and Adam also wanted to stay. He also indicates that he thought they could’ve let him know he was going to be moving across the country to LA rather than letting him be in limbo. For example, Manny said the following:

“There was a lot of situations (in the past) where we reached out, and we wanted to stay there, and they kept saying, ‘Hey, yeah, we’re going to call you back. And we’re going to talk.’ And we’re still waiting for that call. That just sums up the whole summary of why I said that (to SI). It had nothing to do with the fans. I loved the fans. It was unbelievable playing in front of those guys every single night and day. They were always there cheering us on. Whether we were sucking or balling out, it didn’t matter; they supported us through everything.”

https://theathletic.com/1042595/2019/06/23/baltimore-will-always-have-a-piece-of-my-heart-on-eve-of-his-return-to-charm-city-manny-machado-reflects/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • This is accurate based on pockets.  But the Yankees have positive Cash Flow even with the huge payroll, because they are the richest franchise in the MLB.  The fact that the owner can fund higher salaries is certainly important, but it isn't the same thing as team revenue.
    • These two paragraphs are not congruent.  I disagree that the Orioles have to resign Burnes.  I think they should be in on him, but they don't have to sign him. I completely agree that if they do not sign him the have to have another TOR.  I think counting on Bradish to return is a poor decision.  You hope so, but planning on it would be weak.  Same with assuming #2 status for Rodriquez.  His case is stronger of course, but still.  We have some depth IF we have a TOR and that should be Burnes or someone comparable.  
    • There are several. Snell, Pivetta, Bieber (depending on structure of the contract), Nick Martinez (swing type guy) and Heaney.  May be others. This is off the top of my head.
    • I think this is correct but I would say it differently.  I think Elias has done a great job constructing the organization and making it one of the top teams, complete teams, in baseball.  That was a huge hurdle from where he started and that has been a major success. Getting from a top MLB team to a successful playoff team may seem like a small jump but it is pretty large.  And Elias has been tentative at best at trying to make those changes.  He has taken an incremental path in hopes of maximizing his long term potential.  So far that really hasn't had much success.   But like Elias, we really should not assume that the changes needed to make that seemingly small jump from AL East contender to WS contender will not require some pretty big things.  I don't know if that is really different than what you are saying.  
    • It was never in hindsight. The Os were always against it. We had the numbers. We knew how bad it was going to effect the team.   That is why the MaSN deal was structured the way it was. It benefited the Os for a reason. That was essentially the compromise to having the team move to DC.
    • The Mets just had more exciting wins in one week than we had in four months.  I called us the Dull Orange Machine a few weeks ago for a reason.  Really boring team most of the season, with no personality at all.  They seemed to have a "get knocked down, stay down" mentality, which isn't fun to support as a fan.  There are a lot of very good reasons noted here as to why attendance wasn't great, but the energy around this team and the organization is just low and that can't help.  And a slow and boring offseason that doesn't move the needle much won't help attendance heading into next season either.  
    • This.  I grew up in Northern VA and it always took 1 hour to drive to Memorial or Camden no matter the time of day.  It was always easy to find parking as well.  Now that same drive takes 2-3 hours, and finding good parking is a pain.  Plus, the cost of parking, tickets, food/drinks, souvenirs has skyrocketed.  So the choice is to sit in traffic, fight for parking, pay tons of money for the hassle...or sit on my comfortable couch and watch the game on a huge HD screen for free...
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...