Jump to content

Tracking Ex Oriole Thread


Rene88

Recommended Posts

Hader is incredible.  I watched him the other day get six outs to seal a win for them.  

I think that every teams fans sit around and think that ONLY their team is the ONLY TEAM EVER to give up on players to have them go on to find greatness somewhere else.  I'm sure if you talked to a fan of the San Francisco Giants he'd tell you all about the litany of players that have been let go/traded from there to find success elsewhere.  

But man, the Orioles have certainly had their share of doozies over the past few years.  Off the top of my head I can think of:

A 50 homer guy

A Cy Young award winner

Best reliever in the game

A 17 game winner

A consistent .850+ OPS 3rd baseman cornerstone of a consistent World Series contender

I know I'm forgetting others but...man, the Orioles have let go of some good ones.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, LA2 said:

Hader down to 1.82 ERA. Strop has bulked up and repeatedly called Puig "stupid" after plunking him with a clearly aimed fastball.

Remember when Pedro Strop was last seen in these parts?  22 innings, 15 walks, 2 HBP, a balk and 5 wild pitches.  He couldn't have hit Puig if he tried.  That was a long time ago.  He's had a pretty good career except the three months he totally lost it and forced the O's to dump him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Remember when Pedro Strop was last seen in these parts?  22 innings, 15 walks, 2 HBP, a balk and 5 wild pitches.  He couldn't have hit Puig if he tried.  That was a long time ago.  He's had a pretty good career except the three months he totally lost it and forced the O's to dump him.

It was obvious to me at the time, the dude was tired.  We rode him pretty hard and he threw more innings that year than he'd ever had before.  I was pissed that they gave up on him that quickly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Remember when Pedro Strop was last seen in these parts?  22 innings, 15 walks, 2 HBP, a balk and 5 wild pitches.  He couldn't have hit Puig if he tried.  That was a long time ago.  He's had a pretty good career except the three months he totally lost it and forced the O's to dump him.

I remember and yet, one can still seriously question whether those 22 innings were enough to erase the memory and hope of returning to the level of the 78.67 extraordinary innings Strop had thrown for the O's the previous two seasons. And it's not like he had to go through a 3-5 season odyssey with several teams to find himself again, unlike some of the other Oriole castoffs. It's hard to avoid the conclusion that the O's--not uniquely, of course--just plain stunk at perceiving and fixing the problems of very talented pitchers, whether that was Buck's, his coaches' or Duquette's fault.

The Cubs obviously knew what to do: Strop, without an intervening period of ineptitude, has gone on to rack up SIX straight sub-3.00 ERA seasons in a row as a high-leverage reliever. And we acted as if he was a mere throw-in with Arrieta, based on those 22 innings. (As opposed to how many innings given to Wright, Ubaldo, Gallardo, end-of-the-road Tillman, etc.?)

The Orioles absolutely sucked at judging pitching, it's had very deep and pervasive long-term consequences, and it's going to take a lot to convince me that they've solved the problem, especially since the returns on the late-season dump of 2018 don't seem promising.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

It was obvious to me at the time, the dude was tired.  We rode him pretty hard and he threw more innings that year than he'd ever had before.  I was pissed that they gave up on him that quickly.

I guess that could be it.  But in '07 he threw 54.2 innings.  In '09 71.  In '10 he threw 53 innings.  In '11 69.2.  Then in '12 he had a 1.20 ERA in 52 innings on August 15th, then allowed 11 runs in 13 innings (32 baserunners) the rest of the year.  Had the winter off, came back, and pitching low-leverage mopup he gave up 40 baserunners and 19 runs in 22 innings through mid-June. 

I don't know what else you do with a guy who is unpitchable for three-and-a-half months when you're trying to contend.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LA2 said:

I remember and yet, one can still seriously question whether those 22 innings were enough to erase the memory and hope of returning to the level of the 78.67 extraordinary innings Strop had thrown for the O's the previous two seasons. And it's not like he had to go through a 3-5 season odyssey with several teams to find himself again, unlike some of the other Oriole castoffs. It's hard to avoid the conclusion that the O's--not uniquely, of course--just plain stunk at perceiving and fixing the problems of very talented pitchers, whether that was Buck's, his coaches' or Duquette's fault.

The Cubs obviously knew what to do: Strop, without an intervening period of ineptitude, has gone to rack up SIX straight sub-3.00 ERA seasons in a row as a high-leverage reliever. And we acted as if he was a mere throw-in with Arrieta, based on those 22 innings. (As opposed to how many innings given to Wright, Ubaldo, Gallardo, etc.?)

The Orioles absolutely sucked at judging pitching, it's had very deep and pervasive long-term consequences, and it's going to take a lot to convince me that they've solved the problem, especially since the returns on the late-season dump of 2018 don't seem promising.

Yes, it appears he had some kind of an obvious problem the O's couldn't fix (internet go-to: he was tipping his pitches!).  But the Cubs did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

I guess that could be it.  But in '07 he threw 54.2 innings.  In '09 71.  In '10 he threw 53 innings.  In '11 69.2.  Then in '12 he had a 1.20 ERA in 52 innings on August 15th, then allowed 11 runs in 13 innings (32 baserunners) the rest of the year.  Had the winter off, came back, and pitching low-leverage mopup he gave up 40 baserunners and 19 runs in 22 innings through mid-June. 

I don't know what else you do with a guy who is unpitchable for three-and-a-half months when you're trying to contend.

I guess I remembered it wrong.  For some reason I thought he'd thrown more innings that year and looked fatigued.  

That trade worked out pretty damn well for the Cubs, I'd say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

I guess I remembered it wrong.  For some reason I thought he'd thrown more innings that year and looked fatigued.  

That trade worked out pretty damn well for the Cubs, I'd say.

I think he could have been fatigued.  Most of those prior years were in the minors, or split minors/majors.  If the usage patters and warmups aren't right 52 MLB innings in high-leverage situations on a contender in 4+ months could wear you out.

Although that doesn't explain '13.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Moose Milligan said:

I guess I remembered it wrong.  For some reason I thought he'd thrown more innings that year and looked fatigued.  

That trade worked out pretty damn well for the Cubs, I'd say.

Fatigue was mentioned at the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Yes, it appears he had some kind of an obvious problem the O's couldn't fix (internet go-to: he was tipping his pitches!).  But the Cubs did.

So the O's cdn't pick up on a flaw that several teams' batters did...jeesh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • This is accurate based on pockets.  But the Yankees have positive Cash Flow even with the huge payroll, because they are the richest franchise in the MLB.  The fact that the owner can fund higher salaries is certainly important, but it isn't the same thing as team revenue.
    • These two paragraphs are not congruent.  I disagree that the Orioles have to resign Burnes.  I think they should be in on him, but they don't have to sign him. I completely agree that if they do not sign him the have to have another TOR.  I think counting on Bradish to return is a poor decision.  You hope so, but planning on it would be weak.  Same with assuming #2 status for Rodriquez.  His case is stronger of course, but still.  We have some depth IF we have a TOR and that should be Burnes or someone comparable.  
    • There are several. Snell, Pivetta, Bieber (depending on structure of the contract), Nick Martinez (swing type guy) and Heaney.  May be others. This is off the top of my head.
    • I think this is correct but I would say it differently.  I think Elias has done a great job constructing the organization and making it one of the top teams, complete teams, in baseball.  That was a huge hurdle from where he started and that has been a major success. Getting from a top MLB team to a successful playoff team may seem like a small jump but it is pretty large.  And Elias has been tentative at best at trying to make those changes.  He has taken an incremental path in hopes of maximizing his long term potential.  So far that really hasn't had much success.   But like Elias, we really should not assume that the changes needed to make that seemingly small jump from AL East contender to WS contender will not require some pretty big things.  I don't know if that is really different than what you are saying.  
    • It was never in hindsight. The Os were always against it. We had the numbers. We knew how bad it was going to effect the team.   That is why the MaSN deal was structured the way it was. It benefited the Os for a reason. That was essentially the compromise to having the team move to DC.
    • The Mets just had more exciting wins in one week than we had in four months.  I called us the Dull Orange Machine a few weeks ago for a reason.  Really boring team most of the season, with no personality at all.  They seemed to have a "get knocked down, stay down" mentality, which isn't fun to support as a fan.  There are a lot of very good reasons noted here as to why attendance wasn't great, but the energy around this team and the organization is just low and that can't help.  And a slow and boring offseason that doesn't move the needle much won't help attendance heading into next season either.  
    • This.  I grew up in Northern VA and it always took 1 hour to drive to Memorial or Camden no matter the time of day.  It was always easy to find parking as well.  Now that same drive takes 2-3 hours, and finding good parking is a pain.  Plus, the cost of parking, tickets, food/drinks, souvenirs has skyrocketed.  So the choice is to sit in traffic, fight for parking, pay tons of money for the hassle...or sit on my comfortable couch and watch the game on a huge HD screen for free...
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...