Jump to content

Who are the 2020 #1 and #2 Prospects?


Tony-OH

Who are the 2020 #1 and #2 Prospects?  

50 members have voted

  1. 1. Who are the 2020 #1 and #2 Prospects?

    • Rutschman and Hall
      4
    • Rutschman and Gunnar Henderson
      0
    • Rutschman and Kjerstad
      1
    • Rutschman and Mountcastle
      7
    • Rutschman and Rodriguez
      38

This poll is closed to new votes


Recommended Posts

There cant be any other answer than rutschman and mountcastle. Had to go back and make sure he was still a prospect but with only 126 at bats inthe Mlb Ryan should be considered one of the favorites next year for ROY. Rutschman is the top catching and top 5 prospect in baseball. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Kjerstad should be ranked higher than Mountcastle imo.  He has a higher ceiling although you can argue that with no time playing, you “penalize him” for that on lists like this.  
 

 

Yes but on the other hand, MC is already in the show, showing what he can and can’t do. He’s much less Future potential and much more Present performance. Heston is all potential. I think you have to put him first ATM, and I guess Akin and Kremer at also prospects and they probably need to be top 6-7 as well.

hmmmm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

I think the trickiest question is where to place Kjerstad.   I cannot put him above Grayson without having played a MiL game.   But he’s got a credible argument for the no. 3 spot, even if you view him as more like the 7th/9th best talent in the draft rather than the 2nd best.   

Is Mountcastle Akin and Kremer all retain prospect status, they all have to be ahead of Kjersted, don’t they? Prospect is all about potential and Heston hasn’t faced a professional pitch, and the others have all had professional success. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Philip said:

Is Mountcastle Akin and Kremer all retain prospect status, they all have to be ahead of Kjersted, don’t they? Prospect is all about potential and Heston hasn’t faced a professional pitch, and the others have all had professional success. 

No way..those guys don’t have the upside or potential of Kjerstad.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

No way..those guys don’t have the upside or potential of Kjerstad.  

But they are already performing as major leaguers and doing well?

Merely making it to the majors doesn’t necessarily move someone up the prospect list, some guys show up and play lousy. But despite his defense, MC has done well, and Akin and Kremer have been quite good. That has to count for something especially when Kjersted hasn’t done a thing yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It will be interesting to see where these guys are in a year.  

If we had taken Austin Martin with our pick, I think a legit case can be made for Martin to be ranked ahead of GrayRod.  Here we have our FO and analytics guys saying Kjerstad is every bit the hitting prospect that Martin is -- if not a better one.  On MLB.com, Martin is rated 16th overall and GrayRod 31.  Kjerstad comes in at 55.  If Kjerstad knocks the cover off the ball at two levels of A ball next year and enters 2022 at AA and a top 25 prospect, I think a case can be made that Kjerstad could be ahead of GrayRod.

Just saying.  For now, I expect this list should have AR at 1 and GrayRod at 2.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After the draft, I took some time and watched video of Kjerstad over the past three seasons. His growth and maturation as a hitter was evident to me. He also became much more athletic in the past two years. He is a solid defender, and should perhaps be a tick above average in a corner OF spot. LH 60 power is not a common tool, especially one who has an 60 hit tool. I believe in the 2020 video I saw. I believe the adjustments he made mechanically and in his approach are legitimate. The hands are tremendous. 

So, as I said a week after the draft, I believe it is Adley and Heston at #1 and #2. That is no indictment of Grayson Rodriguez. I saw him pitch in the summer before his senior year and could see great potential, but he made serious improvement in a short time. He has worked very hard and it shows. That said, I generally would value an everyday middle of the order bat over a pitcher. Pitchers break all too often. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I hope that Elias is not that dogmatic when it comes to FA pitching acquisitions. If you don't draft them and you don't sign them, you are limiting top pitching acquisitions to come only via trade. That strategy is not sustainable. Another Burnes type trade will hurt us bad. I would to go after any of the first four names on your "not in play" list. If we are letting Burnes walk out the door, most of these names cannot give you anywhere near the production and you will likely be at a disadvantage come game 1 in the playoffs. Some of the names from your "possible free agents" list should not even be considered IMO. Max Scherzer/Justin Verlander/Alex Cobb are all the end of the line and are very likely to be injured just like they were this season and the season before that. Those guys need to retire. Again, if you are not going to fish at the deep end the pool, then we will probably need two guys from your "possible free agent targets" list. Maybe Eovaldi +Montas? It's not great but gives us a shot to have a deeper rotation to go along with Eflin, Rodriguez, and Kremer. Then maybe you get Bradish back for the postseason? Maybe?
    • I’m pretty confident in saying that he won’t be the consensus #1 prospect like the others were.
    • A question precedes #2: when will the left field wall be fixed?  I think I remember Elias saying they probably went too far, which is quite literally true.  No reason they can't fix it quickly.  I had no problem with them moving it back but it is pretty absurd where it is.
    • On #3, I would guess that Elias is very wary about going longer than 3 years for a starting pitcher (maybe four years if pitcher is younger and AAV is favorable).  I think Mike and Sig believe the history of long-term SP deals isn’t favorable and the wrong deal could derail a mid-market team with dead money.  I’m not sure they are wrong (e.g., Patrick Corbin, Strasberg).   I don’t think ownership cares directly; I would guess they just give Elias an annual baseball ops budget and forecast and he can choose how he manages against that.   Not in play Gerrit Cole Corbin Burnes Max Fried Blake Snell Jack Flaherty    Possible free agent targets Yusei Kikuchi Nathan Eovaldi Nick Pivetta Sean Manaea Luis Severino Alex Cobb Max Scherzer Justin Verlander Jose Quintana Frankie Montas Spencer Turnbull Andrew Heaney Matthew Boyd   Possible trade targets Garret Crotchet Sandy Alcantera Jesus Luzardo Eduardo Cabrera Reid Detmers Emerson Hancock Jordan Montgomery Lance McCullers Jr.
    • Is Webb anything special.  I would rather replace Webb with Norfolk shuttle guy.
    • Our SS is Gunnar, our CF in this scenario would be Cowser, and C is Adley. Hopefully none of those guys are in contention for being the team's worst hitter next season. We don't need a power bat in LF - we need to add a good contact bat, that can use all fields and run.
    • Kemp was part of it but bringing back 2 UTIL IF is blocking your best prospect when your manager covets veteranosity. If they aren’t resigned then Holliday gets a longer leash. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...