Jump to content

Minor league rule change experiments


Frobby

Recommended Posts

28 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Not specifically Orioles-related, but the minors are trying out a series of  rule changes this year that I thought deserved discussion here:

https://www.masnsports.com/steve-melewski/2021/03/experimental-rules-coming-to-the-farm-during-2021-season.html

I am not at all sure the line " Another impact of shifts is we see fewer great defensive plays in the infield." is accurate.  They aren't the same play, but I'm not sure the overall number goes down.  

Has anyone noticed a decline in highlight infield plays since teams started shifting more?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Beef Supreme said:

Love the larger bases and the step off rule. Hate the two pick off limitation.

The bases is interesting, the step off rule seems forced.

 "We heard you guys figured out how math works so we are going to make it super easy to steal because we decided that's interesting." .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, jabba72 said:

Im in favor of many of these rules for the reasons they are being tried out. I dont like 4 hour games so anything to increase pace of play is good for me. 

I like the idea of using the minor leagues to experiment with tweaks in the rules.    I don’t necessarily like any of these tweaks, but maybe I’ll be convinced otherwise depending how they play out in the minors.    

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Frobby said:

I like the idea of using the minor leagues to experiment with tweaks in the rules.    I don’t necessarily like any of these tweaks, but maybe I’ll be convinced otherwise depending how they play out in the minors.    

Well I guess I should say im in favor of them being implemented in the minors so they can analyze what works and what doesn't. but in general anything that can shave a few minutes off a game I would seriously take a look at.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have loved seeing a team (mostly the Rays) put a 4th true outfielder or a 5th true infielder in for an at bat. It always seems like a way more ballsy move than the exaggerated shift. 
 

I appreciate the spirit behind all these rule changes. It’s almost surprising that the MLB has identified the same problem most casual fans have and are attempting to find some fixes.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Beef Supreme said:

Love the larger bases and the step off rule. Hate the two pick off limitation.

Agreed. 

I actually do feel like there should be a pick off limitation, but the focus shouldn't be saving 20 seconds per game as it seems MLB's motivation is.

It should be "Mr. Pitcher, you're being ridiculous and we all want to go home sometime tonight."  Make it five or six attempts instead.

Other impressions...

Still working on dialing in an electronic strike zone:  awesome MLB... keep it up.

Limiting defensive shifting: I like it because the offensive side of the game primarily evolved to three-outcomes to counter it, rather than the hitting-to-all-fields approach that I'd hope for.  I think the three outcome focus is detrimental for the game, so if we have to reduce defensive shifting to get away from it, then so be it.
 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, jabba72 said:

Well I guess I should say im in favor of them being implemented in the minors so they can analyze what works and what doesn't. but in general anything that can shave a few minutes off a game I would seriously take a look at.  

You want to shorten the game to five innings?

 

14 hours ago, jabba72 said:

Im in favor of many of these rules for the reasons they are being tried out. I dont like 4 hour games so anything to increase pace of play is good for me. 

Five inning games.

Two strikes and you're out. 

120 foot basepaths

Deaden the ball to 1915 standards

Bring back the spitball and allow all foreign substances by pitchers.

Prohibit batting helmets

Pretty easy to shorten the game to the length of commercials plus one hour. If you think whatever fans that remain will prefer mostly 1-0 games to what we have had the past century, I think you would be disappointed. Because it won't be baseball anymore if you would do anything  to shorten the length of games or speed up the game. Pace of play is secondary to providing entertainment that captivates viewers. While I support certain rule changes, I also support testing all of them out first at the minor league level. MLB shouldn't be locked into ideas. Just because they test something in the minors doesn't mean they should commit to adopting them at the major league level in advance. Like any sport, league decision makers need to tread lightly so as not to fundamentally change the viewers' experience of watching the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No im fine with the rules of baseball like 9 innings and 3 strikes. I would like pace of play increased like it was in the 70's and 80's. The game was the same back then, but took much less time to play. I would like a pitch clock implemented because I think it works. I think deadening the ball to 2014 standards would be good enough for me. Definitely dont like the 2019-20 baseballs used. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Frobby said:

 

Not specifically Orioles-related, but the Minors are trying out a series of rule-changes this year that I thought deserved discussion here:

 

https://www.masnsports.com/steve-melewski/2021/03/experimental-rules-coming-to-the-farm-during-2021-season.html

 

o

 

If nothing else, this will likely provoke many debates/arguments.

 

o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • Yeah like Tony T but Tony has the ability to foul pitches at will.  I want Cowser to be more like @waroriole’s Rob Refsnyder and Holliday to be Steven Kwan.  Is that too much to ask of number one picks?  But I love Cowser and most of everything he brings. 
    • I can't say The Wall gives me all warm fuzzies but it doesn't swing at pitches a foot outside the zone or take a meatball right down the middle of the plate. It doesn't fail to move a runner over or lay down a decent sacrifice bunt. I've never seen it fail to get a hit with a runner in scoring position. At some point The Wall will probably be modified some but you build your team to play best in their home ball park. It's called home field advantage. IMO, Westy is the best right handed bat we have right now for this park. We need someone else like Westy that plays outfield. Bregman would be nice but I don't see it because of Westy and I have hopes Holliday becomes the OBP lead off hitter we need. Note - I'm still pissed but it's getting better. I think I'll live for another season.
    • I’d like to see a study showing that team spending is more closely correlated to owner net worth than team revenue.  There are rare instances where a team owner will subsidize spending (e.g., Cohen) but that’s the exception not the rule - and note that Cohen owns 97% of the Mets vs a much lower % for Rubinstein.  Rubinstein has already been explicit that he is not in this to lose money. 
    • Cowser’s  swing decisions are determined before the pitch is even thrown. And I’ve been saying this all year, and I even said this at the game. I go it’s too early to pinch it for him because his defense is too good but he is 100% going to strike out and that’s exactly what he did with bases loaded. He decides whether he is going to swing a pitch before even thrown This is why he swings at a pitch thrown pretty close to his face . And To be fair, he  had a pretty good season doing that but obviously can be  easily exploited
    • Cowser's progress was one of the more encouraging elements this season, especially on the defensive side. I was already crediting him with being Some Kind of Good major leaguer a post back. Between his and Adley's standout bad performances on the HBP and 2-0 count, I give Cowser more of a grace.     Sure he had predetermined intent to swing, but I think the follow through was some raw instinct as hand bones fractured. Adley not swinging was the lowlight how incapacitated he was.    I believe he commands the strike zone, but to feel so low you can't pull the trigger in that spot...sheesh.
    • I believe Elias plans to bring in two more SP's, the quality isnt what im sure about. But no question he'll want to replace Burnes. Which is why I didnt comment in this thread yet because Povich might not have a spot open at the beginning of the year. 
    • So a “Pollyanna” then like me, @wildcard and others (joking of course) 😇 I’m in your camp but really wonder if Elias/Hyde and Co. can truly“flip the script” as @Just Regular alludes.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...