Jump to content

Friday May 21: Orioles visit Washington in the "Beltway Series"


SteveA

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, bpilktree said:

If Lopez goes 5 innings and gives up 2 runs in the second and retires the side in the 5th no one is upset with 5 innings and 2 runs given up.  It doesn’t matter how you get there is get there.  

Lopez is really good for 4 innings.  Someone analyzed his performance, and if I remember right his ERA was around 3.  After 4 innings, his ERA is huge.  Has to give up well over 1 run an inning after 4 innings. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everybody who picked "zero" in the pool for the number of runs the Orioles would score while Lopez was in the game is a winner.

You can claim your prize from the wet teddy bear vendor near the Statue of Liberty.  ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

 

Is Hyde trying to put his team in position to win this game, or create opportunities to evaluate what guys can do in anticipation of a contending team sometime in the future?

If it's the latter, he's doing a pretty good job. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, spiritof66 said:

Is Hyde trying to put his team in position to win this game, or create opportunities to evaluate what guys can do in anticipation of a contending team sometime in the future?

If it's the latter, he's doing a pretty good job. 

I certainly don’t agree with everything he does but I think this type of team is harder to judge from a strategy standpoint. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, spiritof66 said:

Is Hyde trying to put his team in position to win this game, or create opportunities to evaluate what guys can do in anticipation of a contending team sometime in the future?

If it's the latter, he's doing a pretty good job. 

If he's managing to get the #1 pick next year, these moves are genius.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • If thats where he's at 1B or Dh there will be no extension. The bat woud have to be super special. and it's not. we already have like 3 of those Mounty, O'hearn and Mayo
    • The on field product has the talent to win and bring out fans now.  I’m not saying not to spend more money.  Your first paragraph I agree with. The new owner assumes all the “debts” leftover. Ultimately it’s their responsibility to repair it.    They screwed up big time with their pricing. If this team rebounds and gets in the DS the excitement will pick up. Only the last week did they have any momentum after months of losing it. 
    • That’s a very good point, but then you have the question whether you would be willing to give up McDermott plus for erceg, and that’s an easy trade to make. Plus, the athletics need almost everything, they wouldn’t want Hays But we could’ve found something to satisfy them.
    • IMO, this mindset ("new chapter") is part of the problem. We can't act like the past and the terrible relationship that the org had with it's customer base does not matter or have a carryover effect. Whether the org calls itself "new" or not IMO is irrelevant. The issue is whether or not it will operate in enough meaningful different ways. If the org wants more of it's market to be engaged it is going to have to raise the bar to championship expectations and invest more in the on-field product. That would be different from the past and would indeed reflect that something is "new".
    • All of you guys talking about empty seats and an unengaged fanbase - did you not see the post showing over 41K in attendance, more than in MIL or HOU?  Are those fan bases also unengaged or disinterested? This is much ado about absolutely nothing.
    • I think at this point its just semantics regarding what a successful deadline looked like.  Elias upgraded three positions - SP, 2 RP.  Could there have been bigger upgrades?  Sure, at a bigger cost.  I think it was sufficient.  What has killed the team is the hitting.  If this team had hit like its capable of, and Soto, Eflin, and Dominguez all pitched exactly as they have, we'd all be feeling a lot better about the team, and probably lauding Elias for those three pickups and what a great boost they were at the deadline.  But we aren't hitting - at all - and I don't know what he could have done at the deadline to fix that. Already agreed that the draft strategy must evolve. I don't agree it was a bad strategy to do what they did so far, but it does have to evolve, just as the organization as a whole has evolved.  And I think it will.
    • I don't mean this as any kind of personal slight toward you. Please do not take this as such. But people/fans showed how they felt about this team who has been a loser for almost 4 months. And largely continued to hedge (beyond the Eflin addition) at the deadline. I bet you who did not have a bunch of empty seats for their playoff game yesterday .... San Diego. IMO it is because of the effort that they put in to continue to engage the fanbase. You can't sell people on the "homegrown" stars idea and no need to add a lot of outside talent. And then some of those "homegrown stars" who were so hyped flop. And then not extend the ones who turn into stars. That communicates a lack of investment by the org. Now when you add that up in the economy/2024 inflation and combine that with all of the other entertainment choices that people have in 2024; things like this will happen. Empty seats during a playoff game = an unengaged/unexcited fan base. The org has to own much of this.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...