Jump to content

A weekly look at our farm teams


Frobby

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, LTO's said:

Tampa Bay is just a machine right now. That Bowling Green team is very good. Bowie went 8-4 against both Binghamton and Hartford but probably should have been 11-1. Fenter and Naughton out of the bullpen have been terrible. Norfolk just doesn't get a break with their schedule....

I read that you could take the #1 overall player out of the equation and Tampa would still have the best farm team.

And they didn't need to lose 100+ games for five years in a row to build it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I read that you could take the #1 overall player out of the equation and Tampa would still have the best farm team.

And they didn't need to lose 100+ games for five years in a row to build it.

They would probably still have the deepest for sure. Their top 30 is littered with international signings and prospects netted from trading established MLB stars which is something I doubt you (or most fans) want the Os to do. They also were under .500 for 4 straight years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I read that you could take the #1 overall player out of the equation and Tampa would still have the best farm team.

And they didn't need to lose 100+ games for five years in a row to build it.

No they didn't but from 2001 to 2007, they lost 100, 106, 99, 91, 95, 101 and 96.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

Yes, from 2001 to 2007.

That's super relevant.

Tampa didn’t fall into the abyss once they became a good team.   They traded a lot of good players away and recycled their talent, unlike the O’s who waited too long.   

I don’t think it really works to say Elias didn’t have to do a teardown because Tampa built a great farm system without doing it.   Elias inherited a 47-win team.   47.   He didn’t do that, and it wasn’t because of an intentional teardown by his predecessor.    It was just a long series of short-sighted and bad decisions.   Elias had little choice but to start from scratch because there was very little talent in the organization when he took over.   
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Tampa didn’t fall into the abyss once they became a good team.   They traded a lot of good players away and recycled their talent, unlike the O’s who waited too long.   

I don’t think it really works to say Elias didn’t have to do a teardown because Tampa built a great farm system without doing it.   Elias inherited a 47-win team.   47.   He didn’t do that, and it wasn’t because of an intentional teardown by his predecessor.    It was just a long series of short-sighted and bad decisions.   Elias had little choice but to start from scratch because there was very little talent in the organization when he took over.   
 

The question is how long you have to field an intentionally non-competitive team.

No one is suggesting that the 2019 or 2020 Orioles shouldn't have been about accumulating talent.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After busting out of the gate as some of the top teams in their respective leagues....our A to AA affiliates are starting to show some signs of regression.  Nothing crazy yet, but:

Delmarva (A-):  25-15 overall, still good for first in their division, but we are now behind Tampa's team in our league and even with Milwaukee.

Aberdeen (A+):   23-18 overall, now at 2nd place in our division behind the Yankee affiliate.  Tampa's team is also ahead of our pace.

Bowie (AA):   27-13 overall,  best record in our league although the Yankee affiliate is right on our heels.  

Norfolk (AAA):  15-24 overall, out of 20 teams in our AAA league, we have the 15th best record.  That's....something.

So still good overall, but not as runaway good.   Aberdeen has lost 8 of their last 11............hopefully that turns around real quickly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Ruzious said:

While it's nice to win in the minors, should that really be a priority?  I'd be fine if all the minor league affiliates had losing records as long as the real prospects develop well.  

It should not be a goal unto itself, but it is clearly a sign that things are going well with your system if your affiliates are constantly successful, see Tampa and NY.  And if your teams are consistently terrible you probably don't have a lot of prospects to be excited about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Aglets said:

It should not be a goal unto itself, but it is clearly a sign that things are going well with your system if your affiliates are constantly successful, see Tampa and NY.  And if your teams are consistently terrible you probably don't have a lot of prospects to be excited about.

Meh.  If you have 8 prospects doing well on a team, you're probably doing very well in development - assuming those players aren't old for their levels.  That's 8 players out of a 25-30 player roster - so the team has plenty of room to be bad while the important players are doing well.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Aglets said:

After busting out of the gate as some of the top teams in their respective leagues....our A to AA affiliates are starting to show some signs of regression.  Nothing crazy yet, but:

Delmarva (A-):  25-15 overall, still good for first in their division, but we are now behind Tampa's team in our league and even with Milwaukee.

Aberdeen (A+):   23-18 overall, now at 2nd place in our division behind the Yankee affiliate.  Tampa's team is also ahead of our pace.

Bowie (AA):   27-13 overall,  best record in our league although the Yankee affiliate is right on our heels.  

Norfolk (AAA):  15-24 overall, out of 20 teams in our AAA league, we have the 15th best record.  That's....something.

So still good overall, but not as runaway good.   Aberdeen has lost 8 of their last 11............hopefully that turns around real quickly.

Norfolk, Bowie and Delmarva all went 2-4, Aberdeen 3-3.    Not too disastrous.   Aberdeen won on Saturday 19-4 and lost on Sunday 19-4.    That’s not something you see every day.   And Bowie played a game that was tied 5-5 after 9 innings that ended up 17-9 after 12.    That’s also something you don’t see too often. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Hazmat said:

With the exception of maybe Mundy, it seems like most of our minor league bats have cooled off.

No maybe about Mundy, he’s red hot.   I can’t think of anyone who’s really stood out in June other than him.   Adley has been fine but a step below his May performance, ditto Henderson up to his promotion.   Stowers was having a good June before his promotion too.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Frobby said:

No maybe about Mundy, he’s red hot.   I can’t think of anyone who’s really stood out in June other than him.   Adley has been fine but a step below his May performance, ditto Henderson up to his promotion.   Stowers was having a good June before his promotion too.   

It's a minor quibble, and maybe says more about the current state of hitting, but can you be "red hot" and hitting .279?  Yes, I recognize his SLG of .738 and 8 HR's in 16 games and 1.091 OPS.  I guess he's red hot from a power perspective, but he's not red hot like we've seen Cedric Mullins over the past few weeks.  Again, a minor quibble.  I'd like to see a higher average from Mundy over the long term to indicate he could be a viable DH at the major league level.  Looking forward to seeing more of him and continued success.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Norfolk (20-25) went 5-1 against Gwinnett (22-25). Next up: Charlotte (18-27).

Bowie (29-17) went 2-4 against New Hampshire (31-26).   Next up: Akron (27-19).

Aberdeen (25-21) went 2-3 against Rome (24-22).    Next up: Brooklyn (16-28).

Delmarva 30-16) went 5-1 against (Fredericksburg (14-34).   Next up: Lynchburg (25-20).

After a 3-13 start, Norfolk has played pretty well of late.   They’ve gone 17-12 since then.  Bowie and Aberdeen have cooled considerably in the last few weeks.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • They also haven’t announced the times, yet.
    • Well, I don't like to predict things on message boards but my prediction is we will not acquire two pitchers with a better Zips projection than Kremer. I would be more surprised by two than I would be by zero.
    • You can’t ignore how he pitched against Detroit and the makeup of their roster. He has more value than even Suarez if that is who we end up playing.
    • So it is different from last year? Last year the games were something like 3:00, 4:30, 7:00, and 8:30.   Have they said it will be different this year???
    • Me too. Driving 4 hours to have a father daughter date. Can't wait!
    • The discussion about Cle vs NYY is interesting. The Os always struggle at Cle and their BP is awesome but the starters are meh and so is the offense. I prefer to play NY. Worse pen, doesn’t run as much.  Not a bunch of contact hitters.  
    • Bautista, if he is back to his old self, would be a big addition. Dominguez and Soto have to improve the walk rate. They certainly have swing and miss, but at a significant cost. Cano can throw up in the zone and get misses, but he is used so often he is rarely sharp. He is used to induce ground balls, and the sinker is fairly effective when he is tired.  Akin, Webb and Coulombe are getting some swing and miss. They are all above average in swinging strike percentage, according to FanGraphs. MLB average is generally around 11.2% from year to year, and Akin (second on the Orioles behind Grayson 13.6) is at 13.2, Dominguez 12.4, Cano 12.2, Soto 12.9, Webb 11.8, Coulombe is 9.9 and Cionel 9.5. In fairness to Coulombe (11.8) and Webb (13.7), they are higher over the last three years. They have not been healthy for a fair amount of this season and pitched through some things that made those numbers dip, perhaps.  Bautista was 18% in the same period of 2022-2024. He would be 11th in MLB in 2024. No other Oriole is in the top 100 in MLB. Grayson Rodriguez is at #120. It should be noted that Andrew Walters is at 18.8, ranking 7th. He was our unsigned 18th round pick in 2022. All of that aside, I am not sure the pen is structured the same as in recent years. There may be some moves there. Or, perhaps it is like you wrote, and they focus on Soto and Dominguez making adjustments to having more command, decreasing the walks. Those two are getting a little expensive as well. I guess we’ll see.   
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...