Jump to content

Ask me about a prospect. (Early July)


Tony-OH

Recommended Posts

Since we're discussing a relatively soft-tossing lefty, here's a fun scouting report from 1990 on a then up and coming one:  Tom Glavine scouting report, 1990 July 03 | Digital Collection (baseballhall.org)

Notice what pitch he used when behind in the count:  a fastball away.  He and Maddux lived on (actually a little bit off) the outside corner - getting the umps to stretch the zone.  Lol at his fastball velocity.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ruzious said:

Since we're discussing a relatively soft-tossing lefty, here's a fun scouting report from 1990 on a then up and coming one:  Tom Glavine scouting report, 1990 July 03 | Digital Collection (baseballhall.org)

Notice what pitch he used when behind in the count:  a fastball away.  He and Maddux lived on (actually a little bit off) the outside corner - getting the umps to stretch the zone.  Lol at his fastball velocity.  

Even more LOL that 86 mph was considered 55 velocity back then!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Frobby said:

I am a big fan of the command/control guys.   But it’s interesting how sometimes they get to the majors and don’t exhibit the same command/control they were reputed to have in the minors. I’m not sure if it’s nerves, or just the superior ability of major league hitters to lay off pitches out of the zone.

There's a few skill sets I like to see in young players that allow them imo to often outperform their "raw" talent level.  I'm not saying become superstars, but become starting level ML players when that wasn't the label put on them in the minors. One is a young pitcher with COMMAND of multiple pitchers.  Another is a young SS who has the ability to play at the ML level NOW.  Not just a kid with a ton of range and a huge arm, but one with the polish and fundamentals to not just be a projection.

Rom obviously falls into the former category.  I'm starting to get a little excited about Grenier who falls into the latter.

This biggest problem for these command/control guys at the upper levels is they become terrified to throw strikes because they get hammered, so even with all their command, they live six inches OFF the plate, which does them no favors.  It's why physical growth can be so important for them.  E-Rod burst onto the national scene when he got stronger and threw harder.  If Rom can follow a similar path, I believe he has the ability to be a similar kind of pitcher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/7/2021 at 8:21 PM, Tony-OH said:

Well I can't lie, Weiters looked like the best player in the minors at his time. His dominance then was unparalled. Erik 
Bedard had the best stuff from a starter stand point. Grayson Rodriguez probably is the best now. 

Rutschman is right up there with Wieters from a prospect stand point of having a chance to be impact in both parts of the game.

I mean to ask about this.

Bedard looked better than Bundy did in Delmarva?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Pickles said:

I mean to ask about this.

Bedard looked better than Bundy did in Delmarva?

I'm not talking about one year because if we want to talk about domination you don't get much more dominant than Matt Riley at Delmarva in 1998.

Bundy's velocity kept falling every year in the minor leagues. He never threw as hard as he did in high school when he would sit in the high 90s. By the time he was in Bowie he was good, but not amazing. Bedard had better stuff overall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

I'm not talking about one year because if we want to talk about domination you don't get much more dominant than Matt Riley at Delmarva in 1998.

Bundy's velocity kept falling every year in the minor leagues. He never threw as hard as he did in high school when he would sit in the high 90s. By the time he was in Bowie he was good, but not amazing. Bedard had better stuff overall.

Fair enough.

I still remember, and I know several others do too, Bedard's performance against Texas on 7/7/07.  That was an impressive sight.  Bedard looked like what they say Sandy Koufax did.  I can easily imagine remembering this arm.

I just went and looked at his minor league stats.  He averaged over 11 K/9 in the MiLs for the O's back when that would have meant something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/6/2021 at 4:35 PM, Tony-OH said:

Stowers has the best tools and has produced fairly well this year. He's got the most upside for me out of this group.

 

I see what you mean.  He's now hitting even better in Bowie than he did at Aberdeen.  I didn't realize he had this kind of power.  It's exciting to follow the kind of progress he's making this year.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/10/2021 at 6:39 PM, Frobby said:

“Just?”

I could have sworn I responded to this, but I don't see it.  Anyway, the gist was I'd be happy if he "just" got to the SO rate he had in his other minor league season - roughly 23% of his plate appearances - rather than the 33% rate he's at now.  And he has been showing progress over the last several games.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ruzious said:

I could have sworn I responded to this, but I don't see it.  Anyway, the gist was I'd be happy if he "just" got to the SO rate he had in his other minor league season - roughly 23% of his plate appearances - rather than the 33% rate he's at now.  And he has been showing progress over the last several games.  

Well, I hope he is able to do it.   Generally, players strike out more the higher they get in the minors, as the pitching gets tougher and tougher.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Well, I hope he is able to do it.   Generally, players strike out more the higher they get in the minors, as the pitching gets tougher and tougher.   

It's a normal part of the process.  Batters get better too.  I'm not implying this is anything easy, but it's not like this is an impossible hurdle or anything even close to it.     

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • 100%! I say abolish divisions, play a fully balanced schedule and take the top 4 or 6 or 8 or whatever teams in each league to the playoffs. 
    • The question was asked, a few months ago, whether winning the division was necessary. A lively debate resulted, some saying the division didn’t matter(“just make the playoffs and anything can happen”) and some taking the opposite view. I wanted the Division and I’m disgusted the play has been so bad. And I haaaate the Yankees( sports hate. I’m sure they are all great guys in person.) It will not magically improve, and I despair of winning more than two more games…not even 90 wins. And in a Homer–prone park, how many homers will the Os give up? The thought is not comforting. And there’s little reason to think things will improve against the Tigers or Royals. But at least: 1) next year they will hopefully have Bautista and the position players healthy. 2) The farm has very few MLB-ready players so there won’t be so much bouncing back and forth. Hopefully the guys can settle in and just play. 3) the Os will be looking for a fourth consecutive winning season, which hasn’t happened since the 70s So there’s that…
    • I was about to post a similar thread, but despite my memory issues, I recalled this thread.  I still find myself enjoying sports less and less.  The issue is not my teams, but myself.  It's a sad reality that I'm bothered when my team doesn't win, or does win, but wins in a way that is not how I wanted them to!  LOL!  It's ridiculous.  Frankly, I'm somewhat ashamed. The O's are very likely going to the playoffs.  But instead of being happy about that, I'm more concerned with how awful we've been and how little I expect from them as the post-season draws near.  A real fan loves his team and sticks with them, through thick and thin.  It's absolutely okay to be critical, even frustrated, at times, but when those are the default and dominant expressions, it makes me feel... less than.  It's like this with all my favorite teams (O's/Ravens/Terps).  It's therapeutic, in a way, to reveal such truths.  But the quest to find a way to enjoy sports again, to enjoy what my teams are doing, is a process that is taking longer than I'd hoped.  
    • I wouldn’t say I’m fired up.  I’d like to do enough to (1) win the season series (which only takes one win), (2) clinch a playoff spot (which probably only takes one win, depending what other teams do, and (3) improves our chances of getting the no. 4 seed (which might take a couple of wins, depending how other teams do).   
    • It feels like a foregone conclusion that the O’s sneak in with the third wild card spot and then lose the wild card series. So it just doesn’t really matter all that much what happens from here on out.    Then again, get hot at the right time and this could still be a World Series contender. I have to see some fire in this team before I entertain that thought though.
    • I am not really fired up per se.  I am just hoping that something happens that is different than what we have seen for months.  A late comeback to win the game.  A big inning of 4 runs or more.  Some big hits from Adley or Holliday.   1 win means we win the season series against everyone in the East for the second year in a row.  That would be great.  And even if we lose, I am hoping that watching the Yankees celebrate in front of them and the fans celebrate around them fires them up.   
    • I feel like I asked once years ago, but can someone please explain the acronym “MFY?”
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...