Saturday, August 28: John Means faces the Rays, O's on brink of mathematical elimination from playoffs
By
SteveA
in Game Threads
-
Who's Online 43 Members, 1 Anonymous, 198 Guests (See full list)
- dystopia
- SteveA
- maybenxtyr
- RavensNOsGuy
- Aristotelian
- Frobby
- Paul in Virginia
- Osornot
- Mountain Bird
- OriolesMagic83
- Bahama O's Fan
- FlaO'sFan
- Can_of_corn
- snatch311
- CHIP
- tom_o'malley
- RZNJ
- Dunk35
- Malike
- paulcoates
- Philip
- e16bball
- geschinger
- ShoelesJoe
- TINSTAAPP
- Greg Pappas
- olddogger
- Remember The Alomar
- Allan Bryant
- Pickles
- dabirds
- EdwinRip
- Jagwar
- Grady
- Spy Fox
- O's84
- mazarelo
- Safelykept
- Say O!
- foxfield
- Cheetos
- accinfo
- Keygans
-
Posts
-
Can you imagine that same lineup but with Mayo, instead of Urias, at 3rd? 🙂 -
By Aristotelian · Posted
Good summary. This would be my guess as well. Won't stop people from repeating proposals that make no sense and then getting mad when they don't happen. -
Toronto up 8-1, hate rooting for the Jays. They blew a 5 run lead last night and got destroyed. No matter the results, the Yankees pitching has regressed badly. -
Your logic totally eludes me. He was excellent last year. He has been excellent in May and June this year. He’s not the same pitcher he was in 2022 and before with the Orioles.
-
The end of the first half of the season also marks the end of the third 27-game segment. Here's how our players have done in each segment: [Note: I am editing this to get the columns lined up right, so come back later if this looks funky] Name PA rWAR Rdrs OPS fWAR OAA wOBA xwOBA Rutschman 119 1.2 2 0.816 0.9 1.2 0.361 0.383 226 2.0 2 0.815 1.7 1.2 0.353 0.343 348 3.4 5 0.830 2.9 6 0.359 0.346 Mountcastle 103 1.1 1 0.906 0.6 -3 0.393 0.395 205 1.3 3 0.788 0.8 -2 0.342 0.342 319 1.9 4 0.786 1.1 -5 0.339 0.351 Henderson 124 1.8 0 0.959 1.9 2 0.408 0.389 243 3.7 5 0.938 3.3 3 0.399 0.390 367 6.0 5 1.002 6.0 7 0.428 0.398 Westburg 101 1.4 1 0.903 1.3 1 0.394 0.422 209 2.3 2 0.859 2.2 4 0.373 0.374 312 3.0 4 0.853 2.6 5 0.364 0.362 Cowser 80 1.0 0 1.037 1.4 3 0.439 0.390 177 0.9 1 0.772 1.7 6 0.337 0.365 253 1.3 1 0.768 2.2 6 0.332 0.362 Mullins 100 0.7 1 0.717 0.7 2 0.311 0.304 173 0.1 -1 0.564 -0.1 1 0.249 0.244 250 1.1 1 0.664 0.8 3 0.288 0.269 Santander 113 0.3 0 0.728 0.3 1 0.319 0.302 209 0.6 1 0.706 0.4 0 0.311 0.293 322 1.4 -2 0.796 1.4 -2 0.341 0.322 O'Hearn 71 0.7 0 0.929 0.7 0 0.403 0.502 154 1.1 1 0.802 0.9 2 0.347 0.398 240 1.7 1 0.807 1.4 1 0.349 0.382 Hays 50 -0.8 -1 0.311 -0.7 -1 0.149 0.286 80 -0.9 -3 0.430 -0.7 -1 0.194 0.266 132 0.0 -2 0.686 0.1 -2 0.300 0.312 Urias 44 -0.1 0 0.484 -0.3 -1 0.215 0.214 68 0.3 1 0.608 0.0 -1 0.272 0.295 131 0.3 1 0.649 0.9 -3 0.286 0.297 McCann 43 0.0 -1 0.651 0.0 -0.3 0.284 0.323 83 -0.3 -2 0.501 -0.4 -0.9 0.217 0.289 119 -0.3 -2 0.551 -0.3 0.3 0.240 0.301 Mateo 39 0.3 0 0.733 0.3 -1 0.328 0.292 119 1.3 5 0.734 1.0 1 0.317 0.305 169 1.3 2 0.729 1.0 0 0.311 0.286 Holliday 36 -0.5 -1 0.170 -0.3 3 0.089 0.155 36 -0.5 -1 0.170 -0.3 3 0.089 0.155 36 -0.5 -1 0.170 -0.3 3 0.089 0.155 Kjerstad 5 -0.1 0 0.000 -0.1 0 0.000 0.057 17 0.0 1 0.437 -0.1 0 0.143 0.229 29 0.3 1 0.745 0.1 0 0.334 0.269 Stowers (2) 19 0.1 -1 0.924 0.1 0 0.388 0.448 36 0.1 0 0.763 0.1 1 0.321 0.370 -
-
Good heavens, why didn’t you understand that? When he was with us before he was terrible.you can see his walk rate was never good with us. I was overjoyed when we traded him to the Marlins, and except for last year, he was a headache with them too. So I am concerned, and with reason, that if we buy him back, he will again be bad with us, so no thanks.
-
-
Popular Contributors
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.