Jump to content

Nats recent draft failure


Recommended Posts

Nationals president of baseball operations Mike Rizzo has already prioritized some offseason changes in how the Nats scout and develop their players, due to a lack of recent help in the minor league pipeline.  The draft is the most glaring example of this issue, as MASNsports.com’s Mark Zuckerman notes that Anthony Rendon (picked sixth overall in 2011) is the last Washington draft pick taken in any round to generate more than 1.0 WAR for the team.

Shocking that the great Nats had no one since Rendon drafted in 2011 make for than 1.0 WAR for the Nats.  The article mentioned some of the Nats trades.  That makes the O's of the early 2000's sound competent.  Obviously right before that, Strasburg, Harper and Rendon were huge successes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

Nationals president of baseball operations Mike Rizzo has already prioritized some offseason changes in how the Nats scout and develop their players, due to a lack of recent help in the minor league pipeline.  The draft is the most glaring example of this issue, as MASNsports.com’s Mark Zuckerman notes that Anthony Rendon (picked sixth overall in 2011) is the last Washington draft pick taken in any round to generate more than 1.0 WAR for the team.

Shocking that the great Nats had no one since Rendon drafted in 2011 make for than 1.0 WAR for the Nats.  The article mentioned some of the Nats trades.  That makes the O's of the early 2000's sound competent.  Obviously right before that, Strasburg, Harper and Rendon were huge successes. 

Someone who has literally never watched a baseball game in their life but who had access to Google could have drafted Strasburg and Harper.

  • Upvote 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Grady said:

Should this be over on the Senators message board? I could give a rats ass about any Washington sports team

Well, it probably belongs in the MLB section, where there are lots of threads about other teams.  But since it’s not on the main board, who cares?

i see two guys the Nats drafted after 2011 who’ve been worth more than 1 WAR, but after being traded:

Giolito (11.1 rWAR) - traded for Eaton

Pivetta (3.8 rWAR) - traded for Papelbon

I believe we’ve picked ten guys after 2011 worth more than 1 rWAR - Hader, Gausman, Mancini, Means, Yastrzemski, Walker, Hart, Hays, Mullins, Mountcastle. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, El_Duderino said:

Who cares. They also signed Soto who is on an early HoF track.

Apparently the Nats FO does...

Quote

Nationals president of baseball operations Mike Rizzo has already prioritized some offseason changes in how the Nats scout and develop their players, due to a lack of recent help in the minor league pipeline

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, El_Duderino said:

Who cares. They also signed Soto who is on an early HoF track.

Soto (17.5 rWAR through age 22) is a superstar, and Robles (4.5 rWAR) has had his moments, though he’s seemed lost the last couple of years.   Those are the only foreign amateurs signed by the Nats in the cited time window (after 2011) who’ve been worth more than 1 rWAR.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, El_Duderino said:

I pin their problems less on draft misses and more on their unwillingness to spend like the dodgers. Their lineup should have a core of Turner, Soto, Harper, Rendon. 

“Unwillingness?”  The Dodgers’ annual revenues are $200 mm+ higher than the Nationals’.    The Nats have spent a much higher proportion of their revenue on payroll than most teams over the last decade.   They don’t have the capacity to spend as much as the Dodgers.   Harper and Rendon would have cost more than $65 mm/yr to keep, plus luxury tax.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Frobby said:

“Unwillingness?”  The Dodgers’ annual revenues are $200 mm+ higher than the Nationals’.    The Nats have spent a much higher proportion of their revenue on payroll than most teams over the last decade.   They don’t have the capacity to spend as much as the Dodgers.   Harper and Rendon would have cost more than $65 mm/yr to keep, plus luxury tax.   

They outspent the Dodgers in ‘19.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/12/2021 at 6:24 PM, El_Duderino said:

I pin their problems less on draft misses and more on their unwillingness to spend like the dodgers. Their lineup should have a core of Turner, Soto, Harper, Rendon. 

I don't think Harper was ever going to sign long term with the Nats, and they knew it. He had a serious dispute with them over the contract he signed after being drafted in 2010. There was bad blood there and he was always going to bolt DC the first chance he got. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, ShoelesJoe said:

I don't think Harper was ever going to sign long term with the Nats, and they knew it. He had a serious dispute with them over the contract he signed after being drafted in 2010. There was bad blood there and he was always going to bolt DC the first chance he got. 

“I sat there with my wife and said, ‘Babe, we’re going back. We’re going back to D.C.,’” Harper said. “If they offer me anything close—I want real money though. I don’t want deferred money. I wanted them to understand that. If they would’ve deferred a little bit of it, I would’ve been fine with that.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...