Jump to content

MLB CBA/Labor Dispute Thread


SteveA

Recommended Posts

21 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

Did it hurt Jamie Walker or Kevin Millar?

Yes.  The scabs were never allowed to become members of the MLBPA, participate in their benefits or receive a share of any of the licensing fees that MLBPA collects for video games and other revenues.  The benefits of membership in that union are pretty substantial.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, foxfield said:

Kevin Brown definitely did this, as noted earlier.  And I think while in general your comment is on point, it is on point more because of ownerships desire to avoid FA markets, especially for pitchers.  In fact it is worth pointing out that Brown signed with the Orioles after the last work stoppage and had a 1 year deal.  After a tenure with the Marlins and then Padres, he became the first $100,000,000 man in baseball with a 7 year deal in LA with the Dodgers.

The Orioles just don't move in these markets under Angelos.  This has less to do pitchers avoiding competing with the Yankees, Red Sox or Rays and Jays or even Camden Yards.  It's almost entirely because, the Orioles hate spending money on those guys who play once a week.  And when they do it is not at the top of the market.  Hell Angelos couldn't even be bothered to keep an Ace in Mussina.

Fortunately, you did not say Name 2.  Cause I can't.  Lol.

The very disappointing Kris Benson wasn't a FA (acquired in 2006 in exchange for Jorge Julio and John Maine), but the O's were willing to pay an exceedingly generous salary for him, if we compare with other prominent, roughly 31-year-old starting pitchers of the time, e.g. Chris Carpenter, Kelvim Escobar, and Ted Lilly, all of whom ended up outperforming him significantly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, NCRaven said:

Yes.  The scabs were never allowed to become members of the MLBPA, participate in their benefits or receive a share of any of the licensing fees that MLBPA collects for video games and other revenues.  The benefits of membership in that union are pretty substantial.

True.  I was thinking specifically about employment and legacy but your point is valid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ESPN Passan today has a detail I had been fuzzy on: tender/non-tender decision deadline apparently does happen before this CBA expires, so Yankees Gary Sanchez and whatever other fun ones are out there will be known before the lockout.

The next day is Dec. 1, when the CBA expires at midnight. It's the tender deadline date, which means if a team plans to keep a player, it must tender -- or offer -- him a contract. Players who are going to be non-tendered often wind up on the trade market in the days before, with teams looking to salvage anything instead of just sending them out into free agency, where they go after being non-tendered.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/4/2021 at 5:01 PM, NCRaven said:

Yes.  The scabs were never allowed to become members of the MLBPA, participate in their benefits or receive a share of any of the licensing fees that MLBPA collects for video games and other revenues.  The benefits of membership in that union are pretty substantial.

Oh yeah, haha, I remember playing an old MLB The Show when Millar was like Chuck Milford or some nonsense but you knew it was him. Good times. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Camden_yardbird said:

The latest in negotiations from the athletic is tying pre-FA salaries to fWAR.

Players granted FA at 29.5 years, which seems a bit late to me.  If I were a player I would want FA at 27-28.

I only worry that players will be even more incented to play for the stats than for the best of the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, connja said:

I only worry that players will be even more incented to play for the stats than for the best of the team.

They should use Bill James’ Win Shares.   Probably not as good a stat as WAR but it assigns players a share of the wins the team actually had.   So there’s your incentive to put team wins above individual stats, or at least make them important.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Camden_yardbird said:

The latest in negotiations from the athletic is tying pre-FA salaries to fWAR.

Players granted FA at 29.5 years, which seems a bit late to me.  If I were a player I would want FA at 27-28.

FA at 29.5, no matter what age they are drafted?  If so I wonder if that impacts the drafting strategies in regards to high school kids versus college.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think MLB will offer 29.5 age or 6 years of MLB service.  That benefits the late bloomers while allowing the superstars to continue to reach FA in there mid 20's.

That along with a WAR based arbitration years system will a get good player played more early.

I also think they will raise the 1-3 year base salary to 800K for year 0, 900k for year i and 1M for year 2.

JMO

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, wildcard said:

I think MLB will offer 29.5 age or 6 years of MLB service.  That benefits the late bloomers while allowing the superstars to continue to reach FA in there mid 20's.

That along with a WAR basic arbitration years system will a get good player played more early.

I also think they will raise the 1-3 year base salary to 800K for year 0, 900k for year i and 1M for year 2.

JMO

That's a big payroll raise, especially for a team like ours.

 

Which may be what the owners, Manfred especially and all the nattering nabobs, might be aiming for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I don’t consider a 4 o’clock game a night game. He also caught Wednesday night and Thursday day this week. Moral of the story is McCann will start 4 games in 7 days because he is Burnes preferred catcher.
    • It is absolutely possible. In 2022, the Mets gave a QO to Bassitt, Nikki, and DeGrom. The Red Sox gave a QO to Boegarts and Eovaldi. The Yankees gave a QO to Judge and Rizzo. The Dodgers gave a QO to Turner and Anderson. I know that it seems to be a foregone conclusion that Santander will not be on the team after this season, and while I generally agree that it is more probable than not that he will not be re-signed, I do think there is a non-zero chance that he will be retained. I think he is the most likely of Mullins, Hays, and himself to be retained, even if it is a small chance. The team has told us how they feel about his bat because he plays essentially everyday, and I have heard Kostka say that they value his clubhouse presence.
    • Santander won’t get a QO, and if he did, he would accept. His defense is declining and we have too many capable youngsters who should replace him effectively. But to your question, I don’t know if there’s a limit, but I doubt it.
    • O's will probably have to wait till July for a trade because there are so many more buyers than sellers.  I think teams like the Blue Jays, Rays Tigers and Mets are likely to be sellers but they are still in the race although not very good teams as constituted. 
    • No Scott. He’s way too undependable. We need someone who WON’T enter a game and walk folks like he’s promoting a healthy lifestyle. He’s been a lot bette4 this season, but he’s too undependable, and we already have too many of those. No Flaherty either. That’s like taking your GF back after she cheated on you.
    • The team's continued success has really put Elias on the spot IMO and I don't see a Flaherty type as an option anymore.  My money is on a sensible trade that comes at a price high enough that most of us here, including myself, won't like, but a premium comes with having bad luck and that's where the O's are at the moment.
    • I would be very surprised if every last one of the GM's Elias talks to about quality starting pitching doesn't start by asking about Westburg and the rest.  Again, I think it's a mistake to believe that the O's have a ton of leverage here.  They certainly have some, and Elias is smart and disciplined, but I don't see any bargains.  I especially don't see the luxury of acting like youth and multiple years of control is any kind of rigid starting point for the O's.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...