Jump to content

Cedric on the block


connja

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Times are different now.  The younger fan is bored with the game and would rather like a post on IG than watch baseball.  They absolutely have to be considering the fans.

You don’t need to do dumb things but you do need to try and win.

Will fans come back?  Maybe..I think it’s definitely possible simply because it will be the thing to do, not because they are real fans.

That being said, I don’t think it’s the slam dunk it used to be because the game itself isn’t good right now and the entertainment options keep growing by the day.

I just don't think there are that many fans that they'll lose over the next couple of years that haven't already taken a hiatus.

In any future baseball environment, it's best to be competitive over the long run. That's how you cultivate a fanbase. I'm sure Rangers fans are all excited right now. I think they're spending hundreds of millions and probably being silly. Still, at least that FA approach doesn't rob them of whatever prospects they have, so there's that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LookinUp said:

I just don't think there are that many fans that they'll lose over the next couple of years that haven't already taken a hiatus.

In any future baseball environment, it's best to be competitive over the long run. That's how you cultivate a fanbase. I'm sure Rangers fans are all excited right now. I think they're spending hundreds of millions and probably being silly. Still, at least that FA approach doesn't rob them of whatever prospects they have, so there's that.

What damage does the team cause by spending money in free agency right now?  
 

What damage have the Rangers caused?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

What damage does the team cause by spending money in free agency right now?  
 

What damage have the Rangers caused?

I just laid out 3 scenarios where spending money now is defensible and, while silly, I pointed out that at least what Texas is doing is not robbing them of whatever minor league assets they have. It's adding to them. 

But you're acknowledging reality and still being mad about it. The brothers seem to want to prepare this team for sale. I know we're all speculating, but if that's the case it's a flat out hard no on big spending. It's not about strategy. It's not about the team at all. It's about the balance sheet and totally defensible. 

I'd argue it's also defensible even if they're not preparing for sale. Maximizing resources means spending them when the team's ready to compete. That's exactly what Elias said last week. You disagree with that strategy, but it's a defensible strategy for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, LookinUp said:

Not sure I agree with this. There are all kinds of defensible free agent strategies for this team right now:

1. Go all in. Go big. Try to win this year and next. (have to squint really hard to defend this)

2. Find guys who can be around for 4-5 years.

3. Stay out of it and bank money in the future.

What is less defensible would be:

1. Pay a lot for ok stop gaps that probably won't be around when it matters.

2. Stay out of it and pocket any savings. 

They could make a couple smart additions in free agency. Iglesias reminds me of the right player-right price guy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

They could make a couple smart additions in free agency. Iglesias reminds me of the right player-right price guy. 

Iglesias doesn’t look like a good option anymore. I’d rather roll with Mateo to start the year with Martin and Fox being options. Grenier could get a look in the 2nd half. 
 

We’re at the point now where every guy we sign to an MLB deal means we have to DFA someone off the 40 man. It would be justifiable to DFA someone for a vet innings eater SP, but not for Iglesias. We already know we have to chop two guys off the 40 man on OD for a whatever 2 catchers we roll with. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Iglesias doesn’t look like a good option anymore. I’d rather roll with Mateo to start the year with Martin and Fox being options. Grenier could get a look in the 2nd half. 
 

We’re at the point now where every guy we sign to an MLB deal means we have to DFA someone off the 40 man. It would be justifiable to DFA someone for a vet innings eater SP, but not for Iglesias. We already know we have to chop two guys off the 40 man on OD for a whatever 2 catchers we roll with. 

I was using him as an example of the right kind of signing that we did a few years ago. I’m not suggesting that we bring him back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

I was using him as an example of the right kind of signing that we did a few years ago. I’m not suggesting that we bring him back.

Yeah. Sign with the intent to trade *might* also be a worthwhile reason to spend. Kind of hard to pull off though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I find it mildly amusing that some of the same people demanding spending on free agents because "win now"... are the same people suggesting that it would be OK to trade Mullins in hopes of "win later".

 

(best Seinfeld voice) Not that there's anything wrong with that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, owknows said:

I find it mildly amusing that some of the same people demanding spending on free agents because "win now"... are the same people suggesting that it would be OK to trade Mullins in hopes of "win later".

 

(best Seinfeld voice) Not that there's anything wrong with that.

This is understandable since you aren’t actually reading what people are saying or proposing.  
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

Because if they sell now, the money goes to Peter and when he dies, the inheritance taxes have to get paid and that will be a lot of money.

If they wait until he dies and then, assuming his will leaves the team to the kids, they can sell and not worry about paying that tax.

Why would the sons not have to pay the inheritance tax? It is my understanding that only spouse to spouse inheritance is tax-free.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, panick said:

Why would the sons not have to pay the inheritance tax? It is my understanding that only spouse to spouse inheritance is tax-free.

My understanding is upon death, the inheritance (ie the assets) itself is taxed.

I know someone who has checked into this and is moving to Florida because of it. (They don’t have the tax there)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I didn't watch a pitch Sunday after that Saturday debacle. I had a charity ride to attend anyways, but I was not wasting a Sunday on this 2024 squad.  I'll probably watch some of the Yankees game, but my heart is out of this squad. I still want them to win, but they have given me no reason since May to think this team has any special abilities.  Injuries hurt them for sure, but they just don't have that "it" factor. They have the choke factor down pat though. I can deal with a bad team. Hell, I ran this place through the darkest, leanest years.  But what I can't deal with is an anti-clutch team. This is a team that can look victory in the face and find a way to lose. This is team with no ability to finish off a comeback.  Hell, even in their walk offs it's after their relievers choked away a lead.  The lack of hitting is boring. The lack of situational hitting is boring. The strikeout/homerun all or nothing approach is boring. The fact that they no longer steal bases or put pressure on the defense unless you count Masolino getting guys thrown out by 10 feet, is boring. The fact that both of their super prospects not came up did poorly, but literally crapped the bed and hit like pitchers is boring.  The fact that both of their number one overall selections have been either bad or awful is boring.  The fact that the "TOR" they picked up this offseason took a month and half "off" is boring. The fact that the Orioles still have Jimenez and Rivera on this team is boring.  It's just a boring team.  I'm just not interested in this 2024 squad and have zero faith in them that they can do anything in the playoffs. Even against the Royals (who will run all over the Orioles if they play them) or Twins, I don't give them much of a chance.  I'll never root against an Orioles team, and I hope that some miracle happens and they suddenly become a better team. But I will continue to say that this has been one of the most frustrating Orioles Playoff teams of all time. 
    • Now that Snyder has gone I can passively hope they do well. They should have kept the old name (Washington Football Team).
    • Daniels just completed a pass for 55 yards thru the air.  The guy has a heck of an arm.  Commanders look like a good team again and are dominating an 0-2 Bengals team that is desperate for a win.  21-10 in 2nd quarter.  
    • Westburg is the guy I'd want to run a bit more, he seems a bit more like a heady type player so I could see his instincts growing there, and he had decent numbers in the minors. He's had an interesting year in the SB department, stole 4/5 in the month of April, then 1/3 in May and 1/1 in June, but hasn't had a straight steal since June 3rd. Wonder if moving up in the lineup killed his run game?
    • Or a guy that can just come up and give innings when the bullpen is shot after a doubleheader or even give a spot start and then be sent back down.  Is Pham a likely future ML starter, no, but he might bail the O's out of a pitching bind multiple times next year.  
    • Saturday's game was epically bad and not the type of loss a team on the upswing into the playoffs would suffer and one that I certainly hate to witness. I couldn't watch most of the game Sunday, but I wouldn't DVR it and then peek at the score either, I don't think that I would ever watch if I knew the outcome of a game in advance. The surprise elation (Gunnar's bases loaded double) and the agony of the non-send and inability to hit a sac fly is what keeps me coming back, old fool that I am.
    • Predicting what the attendance will do next year is like predicting Hurrican season in January.  There are so many outside factors that it is just a guess.  How will they finish the year, how much will the spend in the offseason, how many corporations want to get ticket plans,   how is the economy in 6 months, how do they play next season what teams we play and when, will teams like Red Sox, Yankees and big draws play well.   I also think one of the biggest factors is what corporations want to sponsor give aways and what time of promotions will they run.  If you look at attendance some of the largest attendance games minus the Phillies, Yankees games are for the best giveaway souvenirs.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...