Jump to content

Joey Ortiz 2022


SilverRocket

Recommended Posts

In the space of two paragraphs in the writeup, Longenhagen drew a big contrast between Ortiz, praised as a pure up the middle glove the shift will help play up, and Westburg, batched in with a group of guys he threw so much shade as to call "shift-enabled" prospects.

His BOARD has a two grade separation between 50 Ortiz and 45 Westburg.    Between them, he has a "45+" group of another 35-40 guys.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Just Regular said:

In the space of two paragraphs in the writeup, Longenhagen drew a big contrast between Ortiz, praised as a pure up the middle glove the shift will help play up, and Westburg, batched in with a group of guys he threw so much shade as to call "shift-enabled" prospects.

His BOARD has a two grade separation between 50 Ortiz and 45 Westburg.    Between them, he has a "45+" group of another 35-40 guys.

 

I have seen neither play extensively on defense.  I think it's been clear from reports that Ortiz is considered a plus defensive SS at the ML level and possibly an elite 2B.    Westburg has been considered "adequate" at SS and perhaps average at 2B.   We've heard many conflicting reports on Westburg's arm.   I've seen it described anywhere from a 50 (average) to a 60 (plus).    No doubt that Mateo at SS and Ortiz at 2B, along with Henderson at 3B, gives you the best potential defense with plus to possibly elite defense at all 3 positions.

Edited by RZNJ
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Just Regular said:

In the space of two paragraphs in the writeup, Longenhagen drew a big contrast between Ortiz, praised as a pure up the middle glove the shift will help play up, and Westburg, batched in with a group of guys he threw so much shade as to call "shift-enabled" prospects.

His BOARD has a two grade separation between 50 Ortiz and 45 Westburg.    Between them, he has a "45+" group of another 35-40 guys.

 

It’s funny, I’ve never thought of Westburg as “shift enabled.”   But putting that comment aside, I don’t know if you should put stock in that 45 grade for Westburg.  My impression is he has re-graded the players he’s put into his top 100, but hasn’t gone back to re-grade everybody else.   For example, I’m having a little trouble believing he’ll have Norby at 40+ the next time he does a full report on the Orioles’ prosoects.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/7/2022 at 6:04 PM, RZNJ said:

I have seen neither play extensively on defense.  I think it's been clear from reports that Ortiz is considered a plus defensive SS at the ML level and possibly an elite 2B.    Westburg has been considered "adequate" at SS and perhaps average at 2B.   We've heard many conflicting reports on Westburg's arm.   I've seen it described anywhere from a 50 (average) to a 60 (plus).    No doubt that Mateo at SS and Ortiz at 2B, along with Henderson at 3B, gives you the best potential defense with plus to possibly elite defense at all 3 positions.

Westburg has 45 arm and that's why they think he's better suited for 2B. I agree with your best defensive infield alignment. That particular defensive alignment would be great because you'd be playing a legitimate major league SS (Ortiz) at second base where he's GG caliber.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

Westburg has 45 arm and that's why they think he's better suited for 2B. I agree with your best defensive infield alignment. That particular defensive alignment would be great because you'd be playing a legitimate major league SS (Ortiz) at second base where he's GG caliber.

Tony I trust you.  However, I can copy and paste various reports from Fangraphs, Baseball, America, MLB Pipeline that all have higher grades on his arm with comments to go along with it.    There's definitely a lot of conflicting statements between you and the other sites.

 

MLB Pipeline has his arm graded at 55 with this blurb.

Defense isn’t Westburg’s calling card given his size and average speed, but he’s a reliable defender at short and athletic enough to move around if need be. His arm strength is plus

Baseball America says this.

He's a plus runner with the instincts and athleticism to play shortstop in the big leagues and the arm for third base, making him an asset anywhere on the infield.

 

Fangraphs agrees with you.  They give him a 45 on his arm and say this.

 But he moves well for his size and can play an acceptable shortstop at a 45-grade clip while providing plus defense at both second and third base.

Edited by RZNJ
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was listening to an interview of one of the Orioles’ minor league play by play guys (I think it was Adam Pohl) and he said Ortiz might be the best defensive SS in all the minor leagues.   Obviously it’s a potentially biased perspective, but that’s still very high praise from someone who’s seen a lot of minor league baseball.  So, that is to be considered when thinking about how much we’d lose defensively if Ortiz replaced Mateo.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

I was listening to an interview of one of the Orioles’ minor league play by play guys (I think it was Adam Pohl) and he said Ortiz might be the best defensive SS in all the minor leagues.   Obviously it’s a potentially biased perspective, but that’s still very high praise from someone who’s seen a lot of minor league baseball.  So, that is to be considered when thinking about how much we’d lose defensively if Ortiz replaced Mateo.  

Mateo would be proud of a play like this.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

I was listening to an interview of one of the Orioles’ minor league play by play guys (I think it was Adam Pohl) and he said Ortiz might be the best defensive SS in all the minor leagues.   Obviously it’s a potentially biased perspective, but that’s still very high praise from someone who’s seen a lot of minor league baseball.  So, that is to be considered when thinking about how much we’d lose defensively if Ortiz replaced Mateo.  

I don’t think Pohl has any credibility when it comes to stuff like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brandon Hyde from ST.

Special play,” Orioles manager Brandon Hyde said. “He’s a really good defender. I’ve watched him here for up until major league camp the last few weeks. Love the way he plays defense, got great feet, great arm. It’s accurate. Super active defensively. He’s got really good instincts. He’s got a chance to be a good player.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RZNJ said:

Tony I trust you.  However, I can copy and paste various reports from Fangraphs, Baseball, America, MLB Pipeline that all have higher grades on his arm with comments to go along with it.    There's definitely a lot of conflicting statements between you and the other sites.

 

MLB Pipeline has his arm graded at 55 with this blurb.

Defense isn’t Westburg’s calling card given his size and average speed, but he’s a reliable defender at short and athletic enough to move around if need be. His arm strength is plus

Baseball America says this.

He's a plus runner with the instincts and athleticism to play shortstop in the big leagues and the arm for third base, making him an asset anywhere on the infield.

 

Fangraphs agrees with you.  They give him a 45 on his arm and say this.

 But he moves well for his size and can play an acceptable shortstop at a 45-grade clip while providing plus defense at both second and third base.

I agree with Fangraphs. That's a very accurate analysis of Westburg. His athleticism and quickness makes him have the ability to move and play adequate defense around the infield. I think he could be a plus 2B, but I think his arm would make him just adequate at 3B because he would struggle to make those plays where a plus arm is needed.

He also has pretty good hands overall. But I'd disagree with anyone thinks that he has a plus arm. He has maybe a 50 arm for 2B, 40 arm for SS, 45 for 3B. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

I don’t think Pohl has any credibility when it comes to stuff like that.

I don’t know.  He was somewhat critical of other players.  For example, he said Mayo won’t be a 3B in the majors.   But you may be right.  I don’t know much about him, other than to hear his voice sometimes when the Baysox post game highlights on Twitter.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I thought Chisholm missed home too. They didn’t appeal tho I don’t think.
    • Now run scores and Yanks take lead. 
    • Inexcusable missed call in NY. Review Cleo at showed Chisholm out at 2nd. They upheld safe call. 
    • Well, good on posters who proved the SSS side of "Guards Ball." I just found it striking in terms of the narrative in that article, which was basically the same as what most around here were complaining the O's lacked: clutch hitting, passing the baton, aggressive running, getting runners in from third, etc. I guess the real bottom line is "whatever works." Which of course varies from case to case. The old Bill James postseason wisdom was that HRs are the ticket, since you face good pitching and get so few hits. So back to you, Elias, keep crunching those numbers...
    • First, the had a jump in 23’ given how terrible they had been previously, which conditions many fans in the marketplace not to care. They simple weren’t relevant for years. So one very good regular season will not undue years of being bad/irrelevant and treating your customers terribly. Next, I think they missed an opportunity in the offseason by not doing enough by way of big/bold attention grabbing moves. Now I acknowledge that this was most likely due to the ownership flux/transition. I believe they got an attendance/marketplace engagement boost when they changed owners and when they traded for Burnes. However, I believe we would have seen more engagement attendance with say a big Gunnar extension and/or bringing in a big time FA.   IMO this would have created more buzz before the season (say around the time people make season tix decisions - IMO before Christmas is when some people make those bigger purchases). All of this is to say, that it will take time and effort on the organizations part because of how bad of a stain that the Angeloses left. I still have friends and colleagues who refuse to support the Orioles and attend games due to the damage that was done. Rubenstien & co are not going to be able to undo 30 years of awfulness overnight. But IMO it is not enough to simply call it “a new chapter”. They have to make new/different actions to distinguish themselves from who the Orioles were/used to be under the Angelos regime.
    • Just checking in on Gameday, Yankees looking incredibly vulnerable.  Should be the Os out there.  Super lame.  Whichever team wins this series I hope gets knocked out by CLE or DET.
    • If the franchise were better, the fan base would be too.  It’s been a rough 40 years.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...