Jump to content

Joey Ortiz 2022


SilverRocket

Recommended Posts

29 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

I don't think Hall and Mayo did enough this year to stay in a distinct tier. 

I think my top 10 would be Gunnar, Grayson, Holiday, Cowser, Ortiz, Westburg, Norby, Hall, Stowers, Mayo, Povich

I'd absolutely trade Hall for veteran pitching before any of Norby, Westburg, and Ortiz right now. 

I suspect you would/could trade Hall for the same reason I have Hall where I do.  Yes, there's risk (i.e. the reason he's questionable).  But yes, there's top end talent (i.e. the reason he's of interest to other teams).  The risk factor and immense upside are what put him in his tier with Mayo.  I definitely don't see that the upside has lowered for either.  I can see an argument for the risk factor of Hall (not Mayo) having increased a bit.  But IMO, it's not enough to outweigh the upside.

Ortiz, Westburg, and Norby have certainly been raising their floors/ceilings and/or improving their risk factors this year!  Easy to see why they would move up lists.  It's certainly tough to move around at the top of this list!  And how any trade can't just be focused on where a guy falls on the O's list.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, btdart20 said:

I suspect you would/could trade Hall for the same reason I have Hall where I do.  Yes, there's risk (i.e. the reason he's questionable).  But yes, there's top end talent (i.e. the reason he's of interest to other teams).  The risk factor and immense upside are what put him in his tier with Mayo.  I definitely don't see that the upside has lowered for either.  I can see an argument for the risk factor of Hall (not Mayo) having increased a bit.  But IMO, it's not enough to outweigh the upside.

Ortiz, Westburg, and Norby have certainly been raising their floors/ceilings and/or improving their risk factors this year!  Easy to see why they would move up lists.  It's certainly tough to move around at the top of this list!  And how any trade can't just be focused on where a guy falls on the O's list.

I hope to be proven wrong but actual performance matters to me. To me Hall has lowered his floor this year which is why his stock has fallen in my mind. Admittedly it is close, which is why I see them all as one big second tier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think we saw Hall at his best.  That may seem obvious but he was said to occasionally hit triple digits as a starter and I think I saw him mostly topping out at 97 (maybe 98) as a reliever.    I'm not trading Hall unless I'm getting a young starter back.  I mentioned Nick Lodolo months ago so that's the type of arm I'd package Hall and others for.    I still think the best option is just to sign a very good starter in FA and hold onto the prospects a bit longer.    I can still see Stowers, Cowser, Westburg, Ortiz, and Norby all being part of next year's team at some point.    I could see one of Westburg/Ortiz/Norby going in a deal but that might not be until next July.

Edited by RZNJ
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

I don't think we saw Hall at his best.  That may seem obvious but he was said to occasionally hit triple digits as a starter and I think I saw him mostly topping out at 97 (maybe 98) as a reliever.    I'm not trading Hall unless I'm getting a young starter back.  I mentioned Nick Lodolo months ago so that's the type of arm I'd package Hall and others for.    I still think the best option is just to sign a very good starter in FA and hold onto the prospects a bit longer.    I can still see Stowers, Cowser, Westburg, Ortiz, and Norby all being part of next year's team at some point.    I could see one of Westburg/Ortiz/Norby going in a deal but that might not be until next July.

I have a different opinion of DL Hall, if a club values him enough (paired with another young player) to give us an upside pitcher like Seattle’s Kirby or Cincinnati’s Lolodo - I won’t hesitate. He’s 24 years old, has never gone 100 innings, history of injury and control issues. We need to stop falling in love with our players and look at them objectively.

Edited by Chaka Garcia
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Chaka Garcia said:

I have a different opinion of DL Hall, if a club values him enough (paired with another young player) to give us an upside pitcher like Seattle’s Kirby or Cincinnati’s Lolodo - I won’t hesitate. He’s 24 years old, has never gone 100 innings, history of injury and control issues. We need to stop falling in love with our players and look at them objectively.

How is that different than what I said?    I said I would include him in a package for a young pitcher.    I'd be less inclined to package young players for a pitcher with two years of service time or a player like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

How is that different than what I said?    I said I would include him in a package for a young pitcher.    I'd be less inclined to package young players for a pitcher with two years of service time or a player like that.

My bad - I half read your post and only saw “we have not seen the best of Hall”.  It seems we had the same thoughts after completely reading. Sorry :(

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, CharmCityHokie said:

I'm on the exact opposite side of this, I would trade Norby or Westburg out before Hall, Ortiz might cause a pause for me as he plays a premium position. I'm not sure Norby ends up playing an average 2B and Westburg isn't going to be a major league SS. We need pitching, and Hall has had some growing pains this year, but I think he can still be a premium arm.

I could see Norby being the DH when the O's trade Santander in mid 2023.   The O's need offense and Norby seems like he can really hit.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Chaka Garcia said:

I have a different opinion of DL Hall, if a club values him enough (paired with another young player) to give us an upside pitcher like Seattle’s Kirby or Cincinnati’s Lolodo - I won’t hesitate. He’s 24 years old, has never gone 100 innings, history of injury and control issues. We need to stop falling in love with our players and look at them objectively.

I don't think Hall will be traded.  He will probably go to Norfolk to work on his control as a starter to begin 2023.  Then be called up sometime in the 1st half.  JMO. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

Not sure what you mean by accurate?

I think FG uses different methods.

Wrong choice of words - how in-tune are they with folks who watch or scout them regularly.  Meaning not having prospects in top 5 due to draft selection after a year worth of data - See Nick Gonzales and Austin Martin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Chaka Garcia said:

Wrong choice of words - how in-tune are they with folks who watch or scout them regularly.  Meaning not having prospects in top 5 due to draft selection after a year worth of data - See Nick Gonzales and Austin Martin.

I have always gotten the impression that they go with a lot of the same hype at first but then they tend to put more emphasis on performance, especially immediate performance.

Not surprised to see them go Ortiz because of this.  I would be surprised to see BA and MlB do it.  They tend to just go on hype and things like that more so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

I have always gotten the impression that they go with a lot of the same hype at first but then they tend to put more emphasis on performance, especially immediate performance.

Not surprised to see them go Ortiz because of this.  I would be surprised to see BA and MlB do it.  They tend to just go on hype and things like that more so.

I really like Longenhagen.   He is the most inclined to give detailed explanations for his views on players.   Doesn’t mean he’s right but at least you know why he rates a player the way he does.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Farewell to Ryan McKenna, claimed on waivers by the Giants after being DFA'd the other day. We all have followed his career since his great 2018 season at Frederick. Ryan Mountcastle,  Cedric Mullins, and Nick Vespi are now the three remaining members of the Orioles 2015 draft class still in the organization.
    • I can see Adley aging on the Posey curve. He probably has until age 35 before he will hang up the spikes/be a negative valued baseball player. IMO Adley's defense is average, he has a below average throwing arm. But his bat is excellent. And there is no arguing that his presence has made a tremendous impact since the very first day that he stepped onto a Major League field for the O's. Gunnar may not extend because of Boras and the same may turn out to be the case for Holliday. But that should not preclude us from locking up the other guys who prove to be special. Right now Adley is that IMO and Westburg appears to be working his way toward that. But even if we do not extend our own guys, we should bring in others who will sign and impact winning in a positive manner.  Again IMO, not spending and cutting cost is not the way to go for franchise viability/growth. Customers/fans are more informed than ever and have more entertainment options than ever. Your message to them cannot be come out to see the Orioles just because we are the Orioles or "Hey we will probably win more than we lose (like the Rays) but won't make any real efforts to seize opportunities (by spending) when they are there." San Diego doesn't have a problem with fan engagement/attendance even though they don't/haven't won big because they have captured the attention of that market and become relevant by signing star players. And showing their fanbase that they are invested. I am not saying that I want to be like the Padres, but I certainly want the O's to be/remain relevant in this market (like they are now). Every time I take my kids to games, they are excited to go (in particular my youngest). That is how you capture the next generation of O's fans - by being relevant. 3 years ago I couldn't get my kids to go to an Orioles game no matter what! Conversely, I have never had that issue with the Ravens. They've always wanted to attend their games (even practices/training camp).
    • I see Toronto has lost the first two to Tampa for a 3-game losing streak after John Schneider's emotional proclamation of a "big win for May 14th" Monday night. They were up 4-0 with Gausman heading into the 6th today, but....nope.
    • Perfect.   That's when my salmon/tuna poke bowl will arrive via Uber Eats.
    • I'm way too much a snob for Blink-182. I was honestly just about to post this on the music forum.   Apparently he's Czech.  I'm not finding links in English. Anyhoo working on a Peel Session Spotify playlist.
    • With a couple of exceptions it’s almost like the bottom of the draft was better than the top of the draft
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...