Jump to content

Elias prioritizes player development over winning in the majors


wildcard

Recommended Posts

In Roch's blog article last evening Elias talked about why DL and Diaz were sent down.  Its not hard to think that the same logic applies to Bradish. 

https://www.masnsports.com/school-of-roch/2022/03/orioles-option-bradish-hall-diaz-and-wells-in-latest-camp-cuts.html

It seems that though these three players may be able to help the major league club now,  that is not what is best for their development according to Elias thinking.

This is a little surprising to me for Bradish because he spent most of last season in AAA and is one of the  best starter candidates  in camp.  But that is the evaluation that Elias is making and as a fan I guess I have to accept that.

It would appear that to start the season we will see more of Zimmermann and Kremer  to go with Means, Lyles, T Wells and Lowther.

Lopez may be in a piggy back role to start the season as the O's try to find players to fill innings as the starters get stretched out.

One guy I am wondering about is Lakins.   He is not of the 40 man roster so it will be hard for him to make the OD  roster but he is pitching well in the early going.   It will be interesting to see his role and placement in the next week or so.

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No problem with Diaz. Great to see he is healthy this spring but we have better options and he hasn't earned it. Bradish is a bit of a head scratcher but Lowther and Zimmerman have good cases to make the rotation. It's good that we have options and I do prefer whoever doesn't make it starts in AAA instead of getting moved to the bullpen. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He should prioritize development over winning 65-70 games at most, if we are talking about usage of young players.  Whatever will help them become the best players they can be over the course of this season.  

BTW, I certainly don’t see how sending Diaz down is “prioritizing losing.”   I realize the guy has had a good few games, but it makes perfect sense to make the guy earn his way up to the majors with sustained good play, something he hasn’t done up to now.  
 

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

By the way, I’m not too fussed about who makes the Opening Day roster.  There’s very little time to evaluate players this spring.   Things will shake out over the first two months of the season and some guys will come up and other guys will be sent down or released.   If a guy like Bradish has a good start in AAA we could see him at any time.   I’m far more interested in where things stand on June 1 than April 8.   

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well player development should always be the key.  

I've been pretty vocal that I've felt Elias has slow-rolled guys, but I'm fine with each of these decisions thus far.

Diaz was horrendous last year and should put something solid together.  Bradish was a bit up-and-down and Norfolk last year, would like to see him put together some consistency as well.  If both perform well they'll both be up here soon.

I will say that I'll be really annoyed if Hall starts at Bowie.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, glenn__davis said:

Well player development should always be the key.  

I've been pretty vocal that I've felt Elias has slow-rolled guys, but I'm fine with each of these decisions thus far.

Diaz was horrendous last year and should put something solid together.  Bradish was a bit up-and-down and Norfolk last year, would like to see him put together some consistency as well.  If both perform well they'll both be up here soon.

I will say that I'll be really annoyed if Hall starts at Bowie.  

Seems like you might be annoyed.    He may not be at Bowie long but he could certainly see some time there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

I'm not sure what the pearl clutching here is all about.  Let's not pretend that Bradish, Hall and probably even Diaz are going to be in the majors sooner or later.  

And, yes, of course he prioritizes development.  Nothing new.

Exactly. Elias is doing exactly what he keeps saying he's going to do and exactly what pretty much every poster predicted he would do. There are no surprises in this move. I understand a bit of the angst...Hall's stuff was incredibly electric and it will be fun to see him pitch in Baltimore, but everyone in the world knew he was going to start the year in the minors. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

I'm not sure what the pearl clutching here is all about.  Let's not pretend that Bradish, Hall and probably even Diaz are going to be in the majors sooner or later.  

And, yes, of course he prioritizes development.  Nothing new.

Its not a revelation.  Just a confirmation of direction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Seems like you might be annoyed.    He may not be at Bowie long but he could certainly see some time there.

Seems fairly likely if you ask me.  He’s not even going to start the season on a full-season club.   But at the same time, he’s likely to see major league action this summer.   So, fine with me.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Its not a revelation.  Just a confirmation of direction.

That has been confirmed for a while now.

But don’t worry, I keep being told that all of these guys will get sufficient ML time this year and we will spend in the offseason and be ready to contend (or borderline contend) in 2023.

Somehow that’s going to happen with these guys in the minors but hey, it’s happening!!!

  • Upvote 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I think at $5 million he's an insurance policy that can go to the pen if need be. I'd rather not go into spring training with him penciled into the rotation. But I also don't want Trevor Rogers penciled in either.  He also could be a bridge until Bradish is ready.
    • So to all of you saying you would bring him back…. GRod, Eflin, Kremer, Felix, DC, Webb, Soto, Dominguez, Akin and Cano That leaves room for 3 more pitchers and this doesn’t include McDermott, Rogers or Povich. 3 spots left, 1 high end reliever and 2 starters. Which of those 3 spots do you want him at or, who do you take off the above list and keep Suarez over?
    • I went to a few games this year, but here are the reasons I didn't go to the WC games: The team had been an absolute bummer to watch for 3 entire months out of the season and to be honest by the time the playoffs got here I was exhausted and annoyed. The brand of baseball they had been employing for half the season (over-reliance on the home run, terrible ABs, iffy defense) frankly sucked to watch, even on TV, and I'm already spending money to watch them on TV. I wanted them to prove they could get past the WC round before I shelled out more money. I imagine a lot of people share these reasons with me. 
    • People whining about 41k attendance and blaming it on the city have no idea what they're talking about.  Why were there 47k+ of Game 1 against the Rangers last year? Did the city all of a sudden not matter then? It was also a day game. Alas, it was on a Saturday. And they had that locked up for awhile. Why has attendance went up YoY? Look at the Astros and the Brewers. They had *less* people at their G1 games. Is Milwaukee not a nice city? Is Houston not a nice city?  This is pretty simple. It was a day game during a weekday with crappy weather coming off a pretty lackluster performance going into the playoffs. And folks didn't know if there'd even be a home game until, what, barely a week before?  People like winners. Miami is an awesome city. They got a new stadium when it first opened. But guess what? That team stunk in fairly short order upon stadium opening and attendance tanked. 
    • Would love to bring him back on a 1 year deal for anywhere from $3-$7m.  Great depth arm. Don't pencil him into the 5th starter role. This club needs to pickup two starters: a TOR arm and a BOR arm. Have an open competition for the 5th spot. If Suarez doesn't make it, he'd be a great middle reliever arm. Open competition between Free Agent, Suarez, Povich, McDermott, and Rogers. Do not just go into 2025 penciling Rogers into any role. 
    • It's really tough to set a top priority when I don't know what the budget is. I think the new ownership group will be investing more than the previous regime, I just don't know by how much. I highly doubt the O's will ever be in the "spend whatever it takes mode" like the Mets a couple years ago or the standard yearly overspending by the Dodgers or Yanks. It's still tough to make my Christmas list without knowing the balance sheet. If we're the Dodgers, we keep Burnes and Tony Taters. Hopes and wishes it is then: Even if we sign Burnes, which I wouldn't mind at least making a run at him, I think we need another starter, because injuries and how this year went. Even if the Mountain returns healthy, we need high leverage help in the pen. Veteran bat - no idea who, but if Mullins and Santander leave, we will have to add someone -- I don't know that our prospects will be stepping up or stepping back next year.
    • What I like about Webb is he has an excellent changeup and can get LHB's out. Besides Felix, everyone else in the bullpen needs to be matched up. I think it is important to have another reliable guy who can be brought in to any situation. He is also cheap. I think he is too valuable to just give him away to another team. I like him better than Perez for sure. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...