Jump to content

Austin Hays 2022


Ohfan67

Recommended Posts

36 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

No, he wasn't.  He was a smidge over replacement the three years prior to coming to Baltimore.  The Mariners thought so much of him that they let him go for Steve Clevinger, the Chance Sisco of 2015.

You could say a very similar thing about Nelson Cruz before we picked him up.  They made an external acquisition that they planned on being an everyday regular.  I guess we can debate the meaning of significant, but that's enough for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

Yeah they did.  Traded Arrieta.  Traded Rodriguez.  Traded Davies.   Traded Heim.  All for 2 month rentals.   

They did that during the season.  I’m talking about after the season, which is when they knew what they had, what they accomplished and what they needed to do to get better.

Arguing they did everything they could after 2012 and 2014 to be better is wrong.

Edited by Sports Guy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What were the blockbuster moves in the winter of 2013?   Nelson Cruz?

I honestly don’t remember but was the 2014 team basically the 2013 team plus Cruz?  
 

The point would be that no one complains about the prior winter when the team wins.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

What were the blockbuster moves in the winter of 2013?   Nelson Cruz?

I honestly don’t remember but was the 2014 team basically the 2013 team plus Cruz?  
 

The point would be that no one complains about the prior winter when the team wins.

What were the blockbuster moves in the offseaon of 2011 that led to 2012?  Which ones in 2015 led to 2016?

This is the worst kind of confirmation bias.

But this is to all set up the winter narrative.  That we'll get to hear about ad nauseam.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The B-Ref offseason transactions pages are some of my favorite on the site.    

https://www.baseball-reference.com/teams/BAL/2012-transactions.shtml

The famous SP rebuild - Wei-Yin Chen 1/10, Jason Hammel 2/6, Miguel Gonzalez 3/4, Dontrelle Willis 3/20, Joel Pineiro 4/11.    It couldn't have all happened without the indispensable Ryan Flaherty Rule 5 pick earlier that winter.

It'll be so great if by the Super Bowl all we've added to the 2023 staff is a wildcard international free agent.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Just Regular said:

The B-Ref offseason transactions pages are some of my favorite on the site.    

https://www.baseball-reference.com/teams/BAL/2012-transactions.shtml

The famous SP rebuild - Wei-Yin Chen 1/10, Jason Hammel 2/6, Miguel Gonzalez 3/4, Dontrelle Willis 3/20, Joel Pineiro 4/11.    It couldn't have all happened without the indispensable Ryan Flaherty Rule 5 pick earlier that winter.

It'll be so great if by the Super Bowl all we've added to the 2023 staff is a wildcard international free agent.

 

Now, those were some blockbuster moves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The big moves in the off-season of 2013 were trading our 50 save closer, acquiring non descript Brad Bach, signing Delmon Young as a minor league FA, and signing a FA in March, Nelson Cruz, who no one else seemed to want.  That’s the definition of an el sucko off-season.  That’s not even trying to win.  Somehow an 85 win team became a 96 win team.  Why isn’t that off-season mentioned?

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Pickles said:

You could say a very similar thing about Nelson Cruz before we picked him up.  They made an external acquisition that they planned on being an everyday regular.  I guess we can debate the meaning of significant, but that's enough for me.

Cruz was a different case because he had missed 50 games the season prior for a Biogenesis PED suspension, and he was looking for a short, relatively cheap one year deal to rebuild his value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Cruz was a different case because he had missed 50 games the season prior for a Biogenesis PED suspension, and he was looking for a short, relatively cheap one year deal to rebuild his value.

Neither of them were "blockbuster" acquisitions at the time.  I did consider them both significant acquisitions however.  Nelson was probably a slight cut above Trumbo but they were hardly categorically different.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Cruz was a different case because he had missed 50 games the season prior for a Biogenesis PED suspension, and he was looking for a short, relatively cheap one year deal to rebuild his value.

It's so odd that after Cruz was caught w/ the PED suspension, his career really took off.  Of course he never got caught, eh, I mean cheated again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

It's so odd that after Cruz was caught w/ the PED suspension, his career really took off.  Of course he never got caught, eh, I mean cheated again.

Well, he never failed a test and the money was good so connect the dots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Is Hays just taking the high road?  He doesn't mention being hindered by injuries in the 2nd half.

 

https://www.masnsports.com/blog/austin-hays-takes-a-look-at-his-2022-season

The kind of guy that would gut out injuries and keep playing is unlikely the kind of guy that would use those injuries as an excuse for diminished performance.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Probably the correct answer. 
    • Do either of them get claimed?
    • Welp, it’s looking like this will be a thing. Nothing official yet, except for Kimbrel’s blown saves. 😢 It looks like we’ll have Cano and Coloumbe be our highest leverage relievers with Webb, Suarez, Perez, and Akin just a notch below them. Kimbrel probably needs a phantom IL stint at this point to find whatever he’s lost. We don’t have too many low leverage consistent innings at the MLB level.  Has the bullpen by committee worked recently?  Is that how the Dodgers found Evan Phillips?  Boston tried it years ago, but shortly ditched it after a rough start. 
    • He was back to getting a bunch of whiffs last night and I think he was actually throwing harder in his second inning than his first. He was hitting some 96s then. Possibly he just needs to get acclimated to getting warmed up more quickly? Even if he never gets a big velo jump out of the pen, I think he’ll be a good RP. Throws strikes, misses bats and has a very unique fastball that should play well the first time through an order. Whether he can up his velo further is probably what will determine whether he’s more of a solid middle/long RP or a potential late inning RP. 
    • That’s kind of weird and irrelevant. Any GM who hasn’t paid attention to how bad Hays has been since the 2nd half last year and wants to claim him can have him. 
    • If they lost to the Nats last night they’d just move to goalposts to “haven’t been swept in a series of three games or more.”
    • Even when Kimbrel was going better I generally regarded Cano and Coulombe as the top two guys available for Hyde. I believe in part Kimbrel's selection was Elias needing someone he could install and keep face in the clubhouse, but that isn't working out that great. At their position, Cano following Felix is kind of like Mayo following Gunnar in the "skill, not luck" data set.     Maybe Kade Strowd will beat both Mayo and Holliday to Baltimore.    
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...