Jump to content

Should Mike Mussina’s number have been retired?


Frobby

Should Mike Mussina’s number have been retired?  

100 members have voted

  1. 1. Should Mike Mussina’s number have been retired?


This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 05/30/22 at 15:44

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Snutchy said:

No. He made his choice to go in without a team on his hat. 
 

99% of me does not care a shred about this conversation, but the other 1% holds this view right here. This alone negates any dumb tweet that adult-man-named-Buster decides to regurgitate into the universe. 

The O's are not going to make their first non-hall-of-famer retiree a guy who couldn't be bothered to wear an O's hat (OR a Yankees hat). Like get real. It's nonsense to feel otherwise IMO. He only pitched here 2 years longer than Cuellar. Like... who cares???? He was a good pitcher that was here for some years. That doesn't mean we're obligated to retire his number, just like he wasn't obligated to wear anybody's hat. He chose to waffle on the fence like a weirdo. Enjoy neither time retiring your number I guess?! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Frobby said:

So why did the Reds retire Frank Robinson’s number and put a statue of him outside their stadium?   He has an Oriole on his hat on his plaque despite playing longer for the Reds?   Shouldn’t they have been insulted? 

Because he was one of the greatest players in the history of the game?  Don’t blame them at all.  And they traded him away, he didn’t leave.  Of course, in 1966, with the Reserve Clause, he couldn’t leave on his own.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Snutchy said:

No. He made his choice to go in without a team on his hat. 
 

So why did the Reds retire Frank Robinson’s number and put a statue of him outside their stadium?   He has an Oriole on his hat on his plaque despite playing longer for the Reds?   Shouldn’t they have been insulted? 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here’s a list of some players who had their numbers retired by a team they left via free agency:

Roberto Alomar - Blue Jays

Nolan Ryan - Angels

Greg Maddux - Cubs

Rollie Fingers - A’s

Paul Molitor - Brewers

Dave Winfield - Padres

Ivan Rodriguez - Rangers

Wade Boggs - Red Sox

Carlton Fisk - Red Sox

Pedro Martinez - Red Sox

Mark Buehrle - White Sox

This list may not be complete.   It certainly shows there are teams that don’t hold a grudge if a player leaves via free agency.   How about the Red Sox, who retired Wade Boggs’ number even though he (1) left them for the Yankees, and (2) later stipulated in his contract with the Rays that he’d ask to go into the Hall of Fame with a Rays cap on his plaque?

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Frobby said:

So why did the Reds retire Frank Robinson’s number and put a statue of him outside their stadium?   He has an Oriole on his hat on his plaque despite playing longer for the Reds?   Shouldn’t they have been insulted? 

That was their choice and I applaud them for it. I really do. Part of me is just bitter over the whole thing. That guy was my childhood hero and he abandoned ship for the Yankees. I understand why he did, but he did it nonetheless. It could have been any other team, but he chose the Yankees that rubbed Jeffrey Maier in our faces. 
 

And NO, they shouldn’t have been insulted because he let everyone know how much he loved being a Red. He always said that he would always be a Red. 
 

Mussina couldn’t care less about the Orioles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, interloper said:

99% of me does not care a shred about this conversation, but the other 1% holds this view right here. This alone negates any dumb tweet that adult-man-named-Buster decides to regurgitate into the universe. 

The O's are not going to make their first non-hall-of-famer retiree a guy who couldn't be bothered to wear an O's hat (OR a Yankees hat). Like get real. It's nonsense to feel otherwise IMO. He only pitched here 2 years longer than Cuellar. Like... who cares???? He was a good pitcher that was here for some years. That doesn't mean we're obligated to retire his number, just like he wasn't obligated to wear anybody's hat. He chose to waffle on the fence like a weirdo. Enjoy neither time retiring your number I guess?! 

Wouldn't it be a mind blower if the Orioles were just like "Yeah, you know what?  Mussina left here and in retrospect we wish he'd stayed and went into the HoF with an Orioles hat on but hey.  He was still great.  We're still going to retire his number AND give him a statue."

What if the Orioles just went ahead and did it anyway?  Then we'd have to hear endless bitching about how Mussina is the only guy with a statue but no World Series ring and not wearing an Orioles hat on his HoF plaque.  

Maybe they could just put his statue somewhere else, away from the others.  Kind of like a banishment or something.  

2 minutes ago, Snutchy said:

That was their choice and I applaud them for it. I really do. Part of me is just bitter over the whole thing. That guy was my childhood hero and he abandoned ship for the Yankees. I understand why he did, but he did it nonetheless. It could have been any other team, but he chose the Yankees that rubbed Jeffrey Maier in our faces. 
 

And NO, they shouldn’t have been insulted because he let everyone know how much he loved being a Red. He always said that he would always be a Red. 
 

Mussina couldn’t care less about the Orioles.

What else are you bitter about from 20 years ago?  Just wondering.

Mussina couldn't care less about the Orioles.  Also it appears that he couldn't care less about the Yankees.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, tntoriole said:

Split the difference.  Retire number 35 in honor of Mike and Mike… Mussina and Cuellar. 

Well, the reason this came up is that Rutschman is wearing it now — so it’s definitely gonna get retired when he’s done with it!

  • Upvote 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Frobby said:

Here’s a list of some players who had their numbers retired by a team they left via free agency:

Roberto Alomar - Blue Jays

Nolan Ryan - Angels

Greg Maddux - Cubs

Rollie Fingers - A’s

Paul Molitor - Brewers

Dave Winfield - Padres

Ivan Rodriguez - Rangers

Wade Boggs - Red Sox

Carlton Fisk - Red Sox

Pedro Martinez - Red Sox

Mark Buehrle - White Sox

This list may not be complete.   It certainly shows there are teams that don’t hold a grudge if a player leaves via free agency.   How about the Red Sox, who retired Wade Boggs’ number even though he (1) left them for the Yankees, and (2) later stipulated in his contract with the Rays that he’d ask to go into the Hall of Fame with a Rays cap on his plaque?

Did Boggs get his wish of the Rays cap.  I thought the HOF blocked that. 

This list makes the O's look super petty.  If the Red Sox can retire Boggs' number who publicly dissed them and the Cubs can retire Maddux's number (he did win a Cy Young there) and the Padres can retire Winfield's number (do most fans even remember he was a Padre), the O's should retire Mussina's number.  Just do the right thing.  I know Mussina, was a douche, a lot of great pitchers are, but it's the Hall of Fame, not the Hall of NIce Guys.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, wildcard said:

You have to win a World Series to get your number retired in Birdland.

No you don't.  It just happens that everyone with a retired number did win a World Series but that isn't a requirement.  If as said earlier Mike had played his whole career with the Orioles his number would be retired regardless if he won a world series.  Cal won one his second season as an Oriole.  If he hadn't do you think he wouldn't have his number retired?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Spakman said:

I see him as a yankee not an oriole. 

Same with me. He was a good pitcher for the Orioles and I liked watching him pitch, but I do consider him a Yankee. I grew up loving Cal and just thought that Mussina was just another good player. His number should definitely not be retired. Should of had a spot in the voting category labeled "hell no." 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Vlad Jr and Burnes....my priorities. Then you can trade Mayo for MMiller.
    • I'm certainly not "fixated" on this. The real issue is the budget. How high will Rubenstein be willing to grow the payroll?
    • It will be retired with the first big $$ free agent or extension signed under Rubenstein.
    • I have no idea what you are arguing. 
    • Cool, nice work there.   So? Are we owed a large market? Does DC not deserve their own team? Should the fans of Baltimore just become Redskins fans and not tried to get their own team when the Colts left?  (sorry to bring up football again but come on, that fits). I laid it all out a couple months ago, MLB has more teams bringing home the hunk of metal than other sports since 2000.  The competitive balance is fine.  It's harder?  Yea?  OK it's harder.
    • The Cowboys have an owner with deep pockets. I agree 100% … There is some cap manipulation that happens. At the end of the day they have a $255 million limit they are required to operate under. The Dodgers, Yankees, Red Sox, etc can decide each year how much they want to add to the luxury tax fund as opposed to not being able to fit a potential move under the cap. Here are the 2024 payrolls for the NFL and MLB   https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/mlb/2024/04/03/mlb-team-payrolls-2024-highest-lowest-mets/73139425007/ Highest $305 million vs $60 million  https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/cap/_/year/2024/sort/cap_maximum_space Highest $259.5 million vs $217 million these numbers will likely get tighter once they make additions before the trade deadline.  If you can’t see the difference I’m just wasting my time. The biggest driving force in MLB beyond the ability of some to spend lavishly is the tv markets. The club controls so much of their tv revenue that it’s an unfair game. The moved that created the Orioles didn’t have much of an effect on the Senators tv market which was likely nonexistent then. Plus MLB is allowing contract manipulation like Othani’s contract. Instead of $700 divided by length 10 years, Somehow he only counts as like $46 million which is laughable. Plus they are paying $85 million in luxury tax fees in 2024.    The Orioles were a large market team when the Expos moved to DC. They could afford to spend with the Yankees, Red Sox , and Blue Jays. Could the Orioles afford to pay $85 million in luxury tax fees? Could the Yankees? I know the answer to both.  What grounds ? Who cares ? The impact was astronomical …It made it very difficult to compete in the AL East without tank a thon! It split their tv market in half. Obviously MLB papered over that long enough to get an agreement done.    They turned a large market team into 2 small/mid market teams. The Orioles and Nationals payrolls combined place them only 11th in baseball. Obviously they could afford to spend more. But it’s doubtful either will ever be top 10 for more than a season  or two as they try to hang onto a window.     
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...