Jump to content

Pathetic.


Moose Milligan

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, Fuzzball22 said:

We should never pitch to Arozarena. This guy kills us year after year like nobody i remember. Yes there have been guys who did well against us in a given year but this guy is doing it every year.  

Judge?   Grichuk?

Arazrena has only been in the league since partway through 2020.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

So you’re agreeing that they didn’t give themselves their best possible chance to win today?

I agree that Vavra should have started somewhere.  We got beat by a pitcher who was on his game.   The biggest problem with this offense right now is Hayes and Mountcastle are giving us nothing and Mountcastle got hit in the hand last night.  

 

 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

I agree that Vavra should have started somewhere.  We got beat by a pitcher who was on his game.   The biggest problem with this offense right now is Hayes and Mountcastle are giving us nothing and Mountcastle got hit in the hand last night.  

 

 

Elias knows the lineup is a problem too with his focus on drafting hitters who have a more discerning approach at the plate. As opposed to hitters like Hays and Mountcastle who hack at every pitch which works out great when they're hot, but you have to deal with valleys in addition to the peaks with their offense. 

Edited by OsFanSinceThe80s
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Partially, but that’s not all I wrote. But if you’re cool with Vavra on the bench that’s fine. 

I mean I would have preferred Vavra starting too, but I didn't know Mountcastle was hurt until three seconds ago, so I figure they probably have their reasons.

And in light of Mountcastle's injury, (and the trade of Mancini, which everybody was happy with two weeks ago), it's literally the only difference between their regular lineup so the angst doesn't make much sense.

I mean they literally started their top 7 guys, and one guy was dinged up and one guy's been traded.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, RZNJ said:

I agree that Vavra should have started somewhere.  We got beat by a pitcher who was on his game.   The biggest problem with this offense right now is Hayes and Mountcastle are giving us nothing and Mountcastle got hit in the hand last night.  

 

 

The biggest problem with the offense right now is we have guys in the lineup that shouldn't even be on the team.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Pickles said:

I mean I would have preferred Vavra starting too, but I didn't know Mountcastle was hurt until three seconds ago, so I figure they probably have their reasons.

And in light of Mountcastle's injury, (and the trade of Mancini, which everybody was happy with two weeks ago), it's literally the only difference between their regular lineup so the angst doesn't make much sense.

I mean they literally started their top 7 guys, and one guy was dinged up and one guy's been traded.

Ok. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Moose Milligan said:

No. That’s not how it works. 
 

I get that you can’t trot the A lineup out there every day and that Sundays typically are the day in which you put out the B lineup. That’s understood. 
 

But today, on a day where they actually needed to win a game that could have playoff implications, they should have made an exception. 

You can’t tell me they put their best lineup on the field today.  You can’t tell me that Odor batting 5th was a good idea. You can’t tell me that Vavra on the bench made sense.  He’s probably the guy with the best approach on the team outside of Rutschman and he’s only been here like two weeks.  
 
You can’t tell me that it’s STILL A GOOD IDEA TO PITCH TO AROZARENA WITH RUNNERS ON BASE.  His career average against the Orioles is .400.  He’s 1941 Ted Williams against us and we STILL pitch to him.  What’s next, pitching to Judge when we play the Yankees next?

Dude, I said it in the OP which you either didn’t read or didn’t comprehend.  Some days you get beat.  Some days you run into a pitcher that’s throwing the game of his life.  It happens.

But you can’t tell me that this team did everything it could to win this game today; the lineup, Arozarena, yeah man, it was pathetic.

 

And they played a pretty pedestrian lineup the day before as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just not a playoff contender, and if the front office really  had wanted to go for it, DL Hall would not have been given a start, and Gunnar Henderson would be starting in the infield, and  somebody anybody taking Nevin and Phillips roster spots. Clearly Elias is content to punt on 2022 and go for it (hopefully) in 2023

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

I'll be happy if the team plays .500 the rest of the season or even finishes .500 or better. This is a team lost 110 games last year. 

The 1989 Orioles improved by 32.5 games.  I think I can count all the teams in the history of MLB who've improved by 30+ games on one hand.  1890 Louisvilles who have a massive asterisk, the 1936 Braves... I'm already running out of teams.  Neither the '69 Miracle Mets nor the '14 Miracle Braves improved by 30 wins.

If the O's go .500 the rest of the way they win 83 games and improve by 31 wins.  Certainly one of the top 10 year-to-year improvements in history, maybe top five.

Edited by DrungoHazewood
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

The 1989 Orioles improved by 32.5 games.  I think I can count all the teams in the history of MLB who've improved by 30+ games in one hand.  1890 Louisvilles who have a massive asterisk, the 1936 Braves... I'm already running out of teams.  Neither the '69 Miracle Mets nor the '14 Miracle Braves improved by 30 wins.

If the O's go .500 the rest of the way they win 83 games and improve by 31 wins.  Certainly one of the top 10 year-to-year improvements in history, maybe top five.

The SF Giants in 2021 won 78 more games than they did the previous year!  Wonder if that is an all time record!!!?!?!

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Moose Milligan said:

Well yeah, because it’s the day they don’t put their A lineup out there. 
 

I mean, it’s about as much of a must win game as there can be in August due to the tiebreaker implications. No Vavra? Phillips and Nevin? C’mon. 

I have never understood, not once, the purpose of keeping Nevin on the roster this long. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Will he get 1 PA in the ALWC series? To put flesh on the bones, say against Lucas Erceg on for a Save at James McCann's spot in the lineup. He is behind all of O'Hearn, Mountcastle and Kjerstad probably on the depth chart, but if you get Ragans out by the 5th or 6th they could all be used before the endgame.
    • The race is close enough that the run environment should be a factor. In the steroid era or bouncy ball 2019, 15 W/3.50 ERA might be a much better performance than a .242 AVG/24 HR/good defense. Which is more impressive in light-hitting 2024? The whole league hit .243 this year, tied with 2022 as the lowest since... 1968.  I'd probably vote for Gil but I kinda feel like Cowser will win it in a close race. And I'm not sure NY bias is a thing in awards voting anymore with the more online media landscape and more stat-educated voters. When's the last time a NY player won an end of season award they didn't deserve? 
    • Chris Sale wasn't signed, he was acquired in a trade.
    • All of what you posted is why you have to take both dWAR and fWAR with a grain of salt when it comes to valuing defense.  OAA strictly gives you how good a player is at his position vs other players at his position. There is no guessing involved. Now could OAA receive some tweaking, especially with infielders, I think so. I don't think OAA is perfect by any means, but let's say Santana did save his team 12 runs and let's say a SS was at 0 runs saved. Why should he be penalized for playing a less stressful position? In the end he did save runs vs a SS that didn't save or lose runs. I guess in the end you look at all the defensive metrics (OAA, dWAR, DRS) and then make your opinion based off them. I also use my scouting eye and watching most of the games, I'd say Cowser is an above average defensive outfielder with plus arm strength and way below average accuracy.
    • Burnes and Eflin were fantastic keeping the team moving forward in a year Felix, Bradish and Grayson were mostly gone. It is fuzzy for me if you combine Elias' team's results in the cases of Albert Suarez and Trevor Rogers if that's a good job or a bad job. Some talk about people like Pivetta, but I don't see a ton of April/May/June demand.     Eflin, Grayson, Kremer, Povich and Suarez leave Rogers, McDermott and Young 6/7/8 already.    Are those guys ever going to pitch? Povich and Suarez showed enough in September it seems worth it to see April. We rarely see a decision Elias doesn't like to defer, and the first half of 2025 will give information how the roster needs to be managed.    How strong is Felix?    What setbacks do Bradish and Wells have?    Can Grayson hold up more than 2 straight months? Elias is building a body of work he'll win the bids for Corbin Burnes and Zach Eflin when necessary, but I don't think this winter is one of those times.
    • OAA and dWAR are two measure that people use to determine if a player is a good defensive player or not. They absolutely can be mentioned when talking defense. They both measure the defensive ability of a player, though they do it differently. Acting like it some kind of horror to mention them together is one of the more ridiculous stances I've ever seen you take here.  NOBODY said they measure the exact same thing and the EXACT same way, but they absolutely are two measures people use to determine if a player is good defensively.  OAA shows Cowser to be a well above average defensive outfielder while dWAR shows Cowser to be more average. I think OAA in this case absolutely is a better indicator of Cowser's defensive ability. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...