Jump to content

Mountcastle


Joep

Recommended Posts

Mountcastle is fine. He isn’t hitting as well as anyone wants him to, but it isn’t post adderall Chris Davis out there.  If you want to replace someone, Nevin and Odor could go. Or keep Odor for a cheerleader/defensive replacement/pinch hitter late for someone like Chirinos. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

Mountcastle has trended the wrong way since arriving on the scene in 2020. He still has very good statcast numbers for hitting the ball hard, but his swing decisions have not improved and the scouting report is out on his hole low and away.

He also has not improved his plans at the plate when facing a pitcher. In fact, it's almost regressed a bit. He should know that pitchers are going to pitch him low and away and probably off the plate so I can't be swinging at those pitches with less than two strikes. With two strikes, he needs to have a going to RF mentality until he forces pitchers to move the ball back inside where he's more comfortable and does more damage.

 

I really wonder if players do that anymore. Everyone is so concerned about exit velocity and all that other nonsense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Satyr3206 said:

I really wonder if players do that anymore. Everyone is so concerned about exit velocity and all that other nonsense.

If he keeps trying to pull outside pitches his career will be over soon.  The approach is to work away, Freddie Freeman preaches it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they traded him this offseason I don't think I'd really mind (even though I agree it would be a sell-low move), but I can also see an argument for keeping him to see if they can tease out a better performance.  Per @DrungoHazewood's post, there's some reasoning to think he's not as bad as he's been.

And it's not as if he's not a talented guy, there's a lot of raw skill and ability to like there.  He has a giant offseason ahead of him.  I wouldn't write him off just yet but I certainly understand the frustration with him.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Ripken said:

If he keeps trying to pull outside pitches his career will be over soon.  The approach is to work away, Freddie Freeman preaches it.

In other words to become a complete hitter. There's a lot of green grass in the outfield. Doesn't matter how hard you hit it. Find a space.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has Mountcastle been in the majors too long to be optioned?   Just asking?    You keep waiting and hoping for the hot streak that makes up for this horrid stretch he's in right now.   One thing he always had was the bat speed but it doesn't look like it's there right now.   He squared one up to CF in Houston in game 1 or 2 and it died on the warning track.    He's now getting beat on fastballs regularly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if an in-season swing decisions project could be part of it.    I peeked at the August numbers with month end nearing and for the first time in memory, Mountcastle was NOT on the last page of laggards in Chase rate (aka, percentage of pitches outside the strike zone the batter swings at).    There can be trade offs if you put the reins on a wild horse.

I believe Mountcastle is a talented enough hitter Elias-Sig, etc. are thinking hard about what they should or should not try to do, and along with the poor production lately, he has for better or worse improved that metric.

Edited by Just Regular
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Just Regular said:

I wonder if an in-season swing decisions project could be part of it.    I peeked at the August numbers with month end nearing and for the first time in memory, Mountcastle was NOT on the last page of laggards in Chase rate (aka, percentage of pitches outside the strike zone the batter swings at).    There can be trade offs if you put the reins on a wild horse.

I believe Mountcastle is a talented enough hitter Elias-Sig, etc. are thinking hard about what they should or should not try to do, and along with the poor production lately, he has for better or worse improved that metric.

That's interesting in light of what looks like recent flailing at pitches above the strike zone (altho I don't want to do the research to confirm!).

Edited by LA2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I don't think it's anything close to 90%.  As of June the brand recognition of the cereal was under 90%. If you have two pretty similar nicknames isn't it just common sense to go with the one that isn't the street name of a drug? And for the record all I was doing was giving a personal preference.  I never said anyone couldn't do whatever the heck they wanted.
    • This is the story, or part of the story, of the last two Orioles' seasons: trying to balance winning games and reaching the postseason (and, last year and and for a long time this year, a division title) with building for the future. However you balance those two, there is a risk of harming the team. The way the Orioles have been and are being built, relying on a bunch of young position players to blossom at around the same time, enhanced that risk. Sometimes these two objectives line up pretty well, after weakening the team for a short time, as they did with Westburg, Henderson and Rutschman, and to a lesser degree Cowser. Sometimes the objectives don't fit together very well, as has been the case with Holliday and Mayo. The possibility of that misfit was, and is, inherent in the way this team was built. Maybe the harm to the team's overall performance from playing the young guys could have been reduced by better coaching or more effective communication with the coaches, but there was really no way for this team to avoid the problem.
    • He's always looked calm and capable in his mlb at-bats. Let's the ball come to him, as they say. Am optimistic.
    • Position Players: 2023: 105 wRC+, 16.0 BsR, 54.9 Off, -26.3 Def, 23.8 WAR   2024: 113 wRC+, 1.2 BsR, 90.8 Off, -26.1 Def, 27.0 WAR   The 2023 batters had a clutch score of 8.39. That number is -1.35 this season. The 2023 batters had an xwOBA of .319 (15th). That number is .328 this season (6th). The RISP was also much better last year (as we all know). Not only did they hit for a much higher average (.287 versus .246 this year), but their ISO with RISP jumped up to .195 (it was .166 in all situations).    The defense is about as valuable as last year even though they seem much less reliable. Gunnar has been more valuable defensively according to Fangraphs, the catchers have been worse, Westburg and Mullins have been slightly worse, but Frazier was awful last year at 2B (as was Hicks in the OF) and removing him while adding an elite defender in Cowser puts them about even to last year. The base running is nowhere near as good.   The pitching is slightly worse than last year (18.3 WAR and 3.91 ERA last year, 16.5 WAR and 3.93 ERA this year) but they’ve also had a ton of innings soaked up (mostly due to injuries) by guys that aren’t going to pitch for them in the playoffs. Last year, the below group threw 259 innings and gave up 159 ER’s (5.53 ERA):   Vespi, Irvin, Zimmerman, Fuji, Voth, Lopez, Gillaspie, Flaherty, Akin, Garrett, Givens, Bazardo, McKenna   This year, from they have gotten 366.1 IP from the below group, while giving up 229 ER’s (5.63 ERA):   Vieira, McCann, Krook, Heasley, Rogers, McDermott, Ramirez. Wells, Smith, Povich, Kimbrel, Irvin, Tate, Baker    That means that the rest of the pitching staff in 2023 (besides the above group) threw 1194.2 IP, giving up 472 ER for a 3.55 ERA. In 2024 besides the above group, the rest of the staff has combined for 1022.2 IP, giving up 378 ER for a 3.33 ERA. The 2023 pitching staff had a 6.03 clutch score and a 73.5 LOB%. In 2024, those numbers are -0.93 and 71.4 %. The 2023 pitchers had an xwOBA of .317 (15th). That number is .310 this season (T-9th).    In the offseason, a lot of people were saying this team might be better than last year but finish with a worse record. As frustrating as the last 3 months have been, you could easily make that case. The offense has been better overall, but much worse with RISP and less clutch. The core pitching group has arguably been as good as last year’s, they just had a lot more injuries and innings thrown by fringe guys that won’t be pitching in the playoffs. FWIW, Texas was one of the least clutch teams in the regular season last year and then were unsurprisingly the most clutch team in the playoffs. The Orioles followed up their extremely clutch regular season by being the 2nd least clutch pitching team (only PHI was worse and they played an extra 2 series) and 3rd least clutch batting team (only PHI and MIN were worse - MIN played an extra series as well).    So TLDR. They have arguably been a better team than last year that has dealt with many more injuries, had a lot more PA’s and IP’s from worse players due to those injuries, and have been extremely unclutch. Some of that might be luck, some of it might be skill, but it could change at any time. 
    • And sorta boring, like this thread.
    • Even if they make the playoffs, Bautista isn't going to make it back in time. I do think the O's can't go into next season assuming Bautista is going to be healthy or effective. They really need to acquire a couple bullpen arms and not keep getting folks off the scrap heap. And they can't rely on Soto or even Seranthony to have a key part of the pen. I think Elias has tremendously struck out with anything and everything Phillies bullpen pieces (Kimbrel, Soto, Seranthony). Seranthony has a 0.3 WAR in 22 games, Soto -0.2 in nearly all low leverage situations, and Kimbrel with a -1.1. And the O's are out double digit millions, Seth Johnson, Moises Chace, Austin Hays for what amounts to negative value across the 3 of them. That's...not great.  Could things change in 2025 w/ Seranthony and Soto? Sure! I mean, Seranthony looks decent, but Soto is a situational arm who can be downright dominant or otherworldly incompetent. But Elias can not go into 2025 without picking up 2 reliable bullpen arms. 
    • This post would have been worthy of its own thread.  If I can just augment this, last year’s team was 0.36 runs/game better than average on offense, and 0.43 better than average on run prevention.   This year’s team is 0.40 better than average  on offense, but only 0.21 better on run prevention.  So, the offense actually has been a little better than last year’s relative to the league, while run prevention has been worse.   However, the offense has been very problematic the last 5 weeks or so.    As to bullpen regression, Bautista (10 ER in 61.0 IP) vs. Kimbrel (31 ER in 52.1 IP) explains about 2/3 of the regression all by itself.     
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...