Jump to content

Aguilar or Nevin?


Bahama O's Fan

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Aristotelian said:

I would rather have Aguilar, and Nevin replacement is why I thought we got him. I was very surprised he started yesterday. Hope that doesn't happen again for a while. 

Very much this! I hope yesterday's start was about getting him into a game right away to initiate him (so to speak) and not a sign of things to come. His 0-for-4 with 3Ks hopefully helps keep him on the bench against RHPs. He doesn't have great splits in his career, but has been a bit better against LHP. I don't mind if we see him start as the DH or occasional 1B against LHP (or to give Mountcastle an occasional breather if it is against a RHP), but I would have MUCH rather seen Stowers in the line up yesterday over Aguilar and hope that's the case moving forward. I want the default to be Mullins, Hays, Stowers in the OF, Santander at DH, Adley at C (obviously), and Mountcastle, Urias, Mateo, Henderson first to third. From there, you can spell guys with Vavra, McKenna, Aguilar, and Odor. Henderson can play SS occasionally with Urias at 3B and Odor or Vavra at 2B. Vavra against a good RHP over Hays on occasion is fine, same with McKenna spelling Mullins or Stowers against a LHP. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, jamalshw said:

Very much this! I hope yesterday's start was about getting him into a game right away to initiate him (so to speak) and not a sign of things to come. His 0-for-4 with 3Ks hopefully helps keep him on the bench against RHPs. He doesn't have great splits in his career, but has been a bit better against LHP. I don't mind if we see him start as the DH or occasional 1B against LHP (or to give Mountcastle an occasional breather if it is against a RHP), but I would have MUCH rather seen Stowers in the line up yesterday over Aguilar and hope that's the case moving forward. I want the default to be Mullins, Hays, Stowers in the OF, Santander at DH, Adley at C (obviously), and Mountcastle, Urias, Mateo, Henderson first to third. From there, you can spell guys with Vavra, McKenna, Aguilar, and Odor. Henderson can play SS occasionally with Urias at 3B and Odor or Vavra at 2B. Vavra against a good RHP over Hays on occasion is fine, same with McKenna spelling Mullins or Stowers against a LHP. 

I agree 100%

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • I'm kind of with you on this. Everything just feels like a crap shoot.  KC went and bought a bunch of 5th starters last offseason and might mess around and eliminate the top 2 AL East teams. 
    • With our second season of postseason futility behind us a number of posts have been made about the need for "players with postseason experience" to variously "calm, lead, guide, motivate," the younger players.  I've often suspected that this [postseason experience] is a much-overblown quality to guide our player acquisition efforts.  I realize the postseason, notably the World Series, is a mighty big stage on which to perform, but, between high school, college, and the minors, most of these players have played in some pretty big games under some significant pressure.   I finally ran across a data-driven article that set out to answer this question.  Published in 2002 in The Baseball Research Journal, Tom Hanrahan concludes it doesn't matter:   "Do baseball players fare better in the post-season when they have post-season experience behind them?  My research says the answer is a clear no.  Managers' efforts to build teams with players who 'have been there before' appear to be fruitless ventures, sacrificing money and possibly quality for no apparent gain.'"  What say you?  Is Hanrahan right?  Or is he all wet and the Orioles should go out and hire some wiley veterans who've "been there before" to get them over the hump?   https://sabr.org/journal/article/does-experience-help-in-the-postseason/#:~:text=Do baseball players fare better,quality for no apparent gain.
    • I disagree with your conclusion but I'm appropriating this line over the next couple of weeks:  "mega religious Lego playing softie white bread error machines."   🤣
    • What is crazy is that Soto won't be 26 for another couple of weeks.  Guy has been an absolute force on offense for 7 seasons already and he is almost a year younger than Adley.  There is always risk tied to the back end of big contracts, but I would hate to constantly pass on players like this just because we are always afraid of the next Chris Davis (who really fell off the cliff in his age 32 season).  I don't think we will be in play for a Soto type player anyhow, and I certainly understand that management has to focus on finances and the budgets. But as a fan, all I care about is winning games and October success. Whether the Os have a payroll of $50 million, $150 million, or $500 million, I really don't care as long as they bring a championship to Baltimore.  Flags fly forever.  
    • Is Britt the only good MLB journo at this point? 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...