Jump to content

More upside or downside for 2023?


Frobby

Recommended Posts

I’m curious what people think about whether each of our players has more upside or downside for 2023 compared to last year?  Here are my votes.  (U = upside, D = downside, E = even)

Mountcastle - U

Mateo - U (offense)

Urias - U (health and offense)

Henderson - U (playing time and offense)

Hays - U (offense)

Mullins - E

Santander - D

Rutschman - U (playing time and offense)

Stowers - U

Vavra - U

McKenna - E

Kremer - D (ERA worse, but more innings)

Bradish - U (ERA and innings)

Voth - D

Wells - E

Gibson - U

Bautista - E

Tate - E

Perez - D

Baker - U

Hall - U (ERA and innings)

Krehbiel - D

Akin - D

Watkins - D

Overall, I think our offense has more upside than downside.   Unfortunately, I think there’s more downside on the pitching side.

What are your thoughts?

 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My one reservation about my grades is that I think the offense will suffer more injuries in 2023 than in 2022, I just don’t know who it will be.  It’s tempting to dock Hays and Santander for that, given their track records, but my view is that injuries are more often random events than signs that particular players are “injury prone.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hard to argue with your individual grades. BTW they total 12 U, 7 D, which looks promising. 

MLB.com just ran a feature on teams with most gains in one season, with 12 of the 13 regressing the following year. But they're pretty open ended assessing this team. 

It's interesting to note, from their team summaries, that a lot of the big gains came from contributions of one or two key players. Can't say that was the case for us, since even Rutschman didn't play a full season. Maybe Bautista on the pitching side.

Overall, I'd say we're ripe for some individual breakout seasons in '23, along with a slight gain teamwise. 

Edited by now
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd give Mateo, Urias, and Hays all E. I think we have pretty much seen what they can do. I'd give Santander E as well. Aside from injury risk he's been pretty consistent.

I'd give Baker an E. He had a good year, I don't see much room for improvement unless he takes a big leap into Devin Williams territory and I don't see that happening. Could just as easily go the other way. Fangraphs projects him with 3.62 ERA vs 3.42 last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I’m curious what people think about whether each of our players has more upside or downside for 2023 compared to last year?  Here are my votes.  (U = upside, D = downside, E = even)

Mountcastle - U

Mateo - U (offense)

Urias - U (health and offense)

Henderson - U (playing time and offense)

Hays - U (offense)

Mullins - E

Santander - D

Rutschman - U (playing time and offense)

Stowers - U

Vavra - U

McKenna - E

Kremer - D (ERA worse, but more innings)

Bradish - U (ERA and innings)

Voth - D

Wells - E

Gibson - U

Bautista - E

Tate - E

Perez - D

Baker - U

Hall - U (ERA and innings)

Krehbiel - D

Akin - D

Watkins - D

Overall, I think our offense has more upside than downside.   Unfortunately, I think there’s more downside on the pitching side.

What are your thoughts?

 

Great post.  I agree on all except Hays, who I think kind of is what he is at this point.  I'd give him an E. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like this line of thought, @Frobby. This is a cool thread. Thanks.

So there are some changes happening in the rules in 2023. The larger bases and the pitch clock should help teams with good overall speed. Mullins, Mateo and maybe Hayes could benefit. There may be others.

The shift ban with help the LH hitters a bit. So Mullins, Santander, Adley, Gunnar and whomever the DH/COF is they add.

Will Adley hit as well when he's catches 115-120. 

Why do we think Mountcastle will improve? Does the two headed hitting coach has a pitch selection improvement elixir?

If Hayes plays less is he more or less effective?

Why would Kremer get worse but Bradish get better?

Not trying to shoot holes in this but just responding to the OP>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have some disagreements here. I don’t see much upside for Mateo. We’ve seen his best defensively and there’s no reason to think his plate discipline will improve over last year  

Mountcastle - U but limited with no plate discipline and big LF  

Mateo - D

Urias - E 

Henderson - U 

Hays - E

Mullins - U

Santander - E

Rutschman - U 

Stowers - U

Vavra - E

McKenna - E

Kremer - D 

Bradish - U

Voth - D

Wells - E

Gibson - U (compared to Lyles?)

Bautista - E

Tate - D

Perez - D

Baker - U

Hall - U (but mostly a wildcard)

Krehbiel - E

Akin - D

Watkins - D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Jim'sKid26 said:

Why do we think Mountcastle will improve? Does the two headed hitting coach has a pitch selection improvement elixir?

Why would Kremer get worse but Bradish get better?

I agreed on these two. For Mountcastle it's because 2022 was the worst of his three seasons so far-- and not for totally wall-related reasons. If I recall he and Mancini both showed up on some leaderboards of unlucky hitters. Not sure if he'll hit 33 HRs again in new Camden, but I think he's more likely to bounce back than to keep declining. 

Peripherals say that Kremer was worse than the results showed and Bradish was better than the results showed. There's also the fact that Bradish ended the year very strong, and Kremer was real bad in '21 as factors in the data set. (I personally think Kremer is likely to be better than Bradish again, but I do think there's more year-over-year upside for Bradish.)

My disagreements with the OP were Bautista (Upside on SV count, but I see more downside in terms of his overall #s. Worried he could easily have more control flare-ups than we saw last year.) and Mateo (I agree with waroriole above that he might be more downside. Yes he has some skills that could take him to the next level, but he also profiles as a guy who might have just had the best season of his career.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m very intrigued with Wells. I like his intensity. Peripherals are uneven for him, but he visibly wore down the second half of last season. If he can maintain the strength and focus from the first half, I could see him having a really nice year. I could equally envision him being a bullpen piece eventually. Nice list Frobby.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Slight Upward Arc said:

I’m very intrigued with Wells. I like his intensity. Peripherals are uneven for him, but he visibly wore down the second half of last season. If he can maintain the strength and focus from the first half, I could see him having a really nice year. I could equally envision him being a bullpen piece eventually. Nice list Frobby.

The key thing for Wells is his K rate. I don't think he can sustain success with K rate in the 6's. Either his K rate will normalize, or his ERA will. I also think he may be a better fit for bullpen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Slight Upward Arc said:

I’m very intrigued with Wells. I like his intensity. Peripherals are uneven for him, but he visibly wore down the second half of last season. If he can maintain the strength and focus from the first half, I could see him having a really nice year. I could equally envision him being a bullpen piece eventually. Nice list Frobby.

Welcome to the board.  Great screen name!  Is that a reference to the bat path, or the path of the team?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jim'sKid26 said:

Why do we think Mountcastle will improve? Does the two headed hitting coach has a pitch selection improvement elixir?

His HH% and EV was pretty high in 2022.  But his BA wasn’t.  If you look on Baseballsavant at his percentile rankings for batted balls, he’s in the 80 and 90th percentile for the majority of the “expected” stats.  All of that means he hit the ball hard but it just didn’t find holes.  He may never match his 2021 HR total but he should find a few more holes in LF for some hits and doubles.  OBP will likely be bad still since he can’t take a walk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • Friedman and Dombrowski set a high bar, and the Astros are post peak.    Atlanta probably doesn't want to hear much about the Orioles misfortune. The Orioles level of play has been in the toilet half a season but I still think the good version of themselves is the AL's best positioned team to outplay the NL's best even this year.     We'll see if Soto and Judge are more than a 1-year thing, but even so that club has vulnerabilities.
    • I agree it's unlikely but not completely far fetched. I don't think he is a lock to get more than $20M in AAV, so he could decide to take it and then hit FA if he has a good or even better year. His talent level is in a similar range as the players who have accepted: Joc Pederson, Jose Abreu, Wieters etc.
    • Sort of a funny game to have come directly after a discussion of the merits of bunting with 1st and 2nd with nobody out. Glad Bob Melvin and I don’t see eye to eye on that issue…didn’t work out in his favor today.
    • Let's be honest, Gunnar ain't finishing second either.
    • Yeah, I don't think the Orioles' struggles against NL teams is very meaningful, but I do think the NL is stronger this year.  All the NL division leaders have looked formidable and steady throughout the season.  But also the Padres and Mets have kicked their seasons into another gear and have really impressed over the past couple of months.  Compare them to the Wild Card teams in the AL, and they just appear more formidable on paper.   Also the DBacks are pretty much outhitting everyone right now -- though that's been offset by their not so effective pitching.  
    • For sure he is out of consideration as the MVP favorite to copy Cal.  Of course,  Cal didn't have an Aaron Judge to compete with.  The runner-up in MVP voting in 1983 was a guy named Eddie Murray.  Eddie had more HR, more RBI, a higher slugging and OPS than Cal, but Cal had a higher WAR and batting average (.318 to .303).  I wonder if Eddie is bitter about losing the MVP to Cal?  A case could be made for either one. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...