Jump to content

Orioles Acquire LHP Cole Irvin from the A's for Darrel Hernaiz


LTO's

Recommended Posts

Just now, Moose Milligan said:

Lol, everyone wants to be first.

When Beane swings a trade, it makes me wonder why he wanted the player he got back.  I'm now thinking more of Hernaiz than I ever did before.

Irvin looks decent, wondering if he's coming in for a rotation spot or a long man.

Beane moved into a senior advisor role in November 2022.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like a league average lefty who can put up 180 innings a year. Not a bad piece to have, probably for the right price, but not the TOR guy everyone of course wants.

I like the four years of team control and ability to eat innings. Looks like he may have benefited from pitching in Oakland with a .451 xSLG vs an actual of .416; hopefully that carries over to Baltimore as well.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ThisIsBirdland said:

Looks like a league average lefty who can put up 180 innings a year. Not a bad piece to have, probably for the right price, but not the TOR guy everyone of course wants.

I like the four years of team control and ability to eat innings. Looks like he may have benefited from pitching in Oakland with a .451 xSLG vs an actual of .416; hopefully that carries over to Baltimore as well.

I'd say he's a tick below average.  Not the worst piece to add.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking for positives:   360 innings the past two, both with 4.2 FIP.   That's kind of a floor for a #4/#5 starter.   Lefthanded, which is nice to have at OPACY.

Hopefully he can be a swing man who only starts if younger options are hurt or not performing.   If they are pencilling him AND Gibson into rotation spots at the expense of guys like DL Hall or Wells, that would be no bueno.

 

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SteveA said:

Looking for positives:   360 innings the past two, both with 4.2 FIP.   That's kind of a floor for a #4/#5 starter.   Lefthanded, which is nice to have at OPACY.

Hopefully he can be a swing man who only starts if younger options are hurt or not performing.   If they are pencilling him AND Gibson into rotation spots at the expense of guys like DL Hall or Wells, that would be no bueno.

 

I think that sums it up well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Starting point has changed.  Given the fact he has approx 1/7th of his season in the books at 1.139, to OPS just .780 for the season, he'd have to drop off to under .730 the rest of the way.  That sort of drop off wouldn't be acceptable to me. I'd like him to OPS .800 the rest of the way for roughly .850 for the season.  The more they use him in a platoon role, the better I think that number might be.
    • Can I ask how you timed it vs the DVR?  Did you use a stopwatch or count click with pause/FF, or something else?
    • I can’t fathom why anyone would want a Tanner Scott return. In 10 innings, he is 0-4 with a 1.78 whip. He was maddening before, and now he’s older. But I wonder if the Red Sox would part with Justin Slaten? He’s been pretty outstanding. Yeah, only 8 innings, but we hired Yohan Ramirez, and he’s been a catastrophe in 10. Yes, I know he’s a rule 5, and the Bosox are in the East. And their pitching is pretty thin, too. But they know they aren’t going anywhere in this division, and they might think getting a good return for a Free Rule 5 guy might be worthwhile.
    • This draft unfolded weirdly.  First with the *nix guys getting taken early and then how no defensive players got taken all draft, and then a bunch of teams reaching for OTs.  I'm pretty happy with how the draft unfolded because I think we got a player that I expected to be gone by the teens or early 20s.  I don't know what we're doing with our OL but hopefully we can maybe trade up from 62 to pick someone up.
    • I have it on dvr and I timed it four times. I got 10.75, 10.80, 10.74, and 10.78.
    • This is exactly what EDC said tonight     
    • My guess is more of a safety profile than they preferred. They clearly wanted Wiggins. They ran that pick up fast. And then when you listen to the press conference, the love for the player was obvious.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...