Jump to content

Jordan Westburg 2023


Just Regular

Recommended Posts

29 minutes ago, btdart20 said:

Sorry.  I misread your comment.  I thought you were painting with broader strokes than you were.

This is fair in general.  I responded that way because a) I misunderstood the post but b) it seems like sometimes we come to the board projecting our belief that this is a D team who is only in it by sheer luck with little to support that claim.  (Just like I don't think Gunnar is the bum many thought he was a few days ago.)  @Bemorewins clearly wasn't doing that in the context here and that's on me.

Of those many who were down on Gunnar. I would say most were not able or refused to contextualize his early season struggles within the context of the modern game. The reality is for most young guys nowadays, even  for the very elite prospects, they initial struggle and take time to acclimate at this level. Gunnar won’t be the first and certainly not the last.

But I try to make it a habit of believing/betting on talent. Gunnar was the #1 rated prospect entering the season for no reason. That means the overwhelming consensus of talent evaluators watched/observed him and believed that he had special abilities. 

I think it’s unfair that some put unrealistic expectations on “our guys” to come up and experience immediate success. It’s just not the norm in the modern game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Billy F-Face3 said:

I love watching Jordan Westburg highlights. Especially when they show off good defensive play. Thank you for posting!

I think some people have the impression that Westburg is a poor defender.  He’s not, from what I’ve seen.  It’s just that we have two young guys who are better defensively (Ortiz and Henderson), plus two vets who respectively won a Fielding Bible award and a gold glove last year.   So, the bar is really high.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I think some people have the impression that Westburg is a poor defender.  He’s not, from what I’ve seen.  It’s just that we have two young guys who are better defensively (Ortiz and Henderson), plus two vets who respectively won a Fielding Bible award and a gold glove last year.   So, the bar is really high.   

I mean, he's not Delmon Young, Aubrey Huff or Mike Trumbo bad, but I don't get the impression his glove is going to be an asset anywhere on the dirt except maybe second base. He could probably play shortstop, especially while he's younger, but I doubt he'd put up positive fielding metrics over a long timespan there. You can even see on that play he doesn't have the greatest SS arm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ChosenOne21 said:

I mean, he's not Delmon Young, Aubrey Huff or Mike Trumbo bad, but I don't get the impression his glove is going to be an asset anywhere on the dirt except maybe second base. He could probably play shortstop, especially while he's younger, but I doubt he'd put up positive fielding metrics over a long timespan there. You can even see on that play he doesn't have the greatest SS arm.

Considering that he was throwing off his back foot, without getting to properly set himself, the arm strength seemed reasonable enough to me.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll just throw this here from Fangraphs Jeff Zimmermann.

https://fantasy.fangraphs.com/savant-hitter-aging-curves-improvement-chances/

The key takeaway for me is that, on average, it’s tough to show a significant power improvement after a batter’s age-24 season. While the curves head up after that age, it is in small increments.

Westburg today is about 24.3 years old so it may be the power we'll see right off the bat from him will be near to his peak capability.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From Steve Melewski:

This season [Westburg],is batting .290 with a .934 OPS, 17 homers and 52 RBIs in 63 games through Wednesday night. In his two seasons with Norfolk, he has now played 154 games batting .280/.364/.532/.896 with 40 doubles, five triples, 35 homers, 119 runs and 126 RBIs.

It is easy to see why many in Birdland wonder when his call will come? But Britton paints a picture of a player seemingly relentless to keep pushing and keep getting better.

“Just a testament to the makeup of this kid,” Britton said. “He is super consistent. He pretty much has the same routine every day that he comes to the ballpark, he has a purpose for everything that he does. I think in the end - I know he is putting up these gaudy numbers - this will be something that makes him an even better big leaguer. He is going to appreciate the opportunity when it does come. He is on pace to go 40-40 here, after the year he had last year. Really proud of what Westburg has done on a daily basis.

“We’ve hit him in the middle of the lineup, just to give him a different look into how he is being pitched. Try to get more guys in scoring position for pitchers to attack him differently. He has responded with nothing but big numbers."

Westburg is clearly aware others have gotten to Baltimore ahead of him.

“I talk to the major league staff often and his name comes up all the time. Just remind him it’s not gotten lost in what he is doing. They are watching and very pleased about what he is doing. Now it’s about opportunity and keep doing what you are doing so when the time comes you are ready to go win up there.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Just to be clear, though, fWAR also includes a substantial adjustment for position, including a negative one for Cowser.  For a clearer example on that front, as the chart posted higher on this page indicates, Carlos Santana had a +14 OAA — which is the source data that fWAR’s defensive component is based on. That 14 outs above average equates to 11-12 (they use different values on this for some reason) runs better than the average 1B.  So does Santana have a 12.0 defensive value, per fWAR? He does not. That’s because they adjust his defensive value downward to reflect that he’s playing a less difficult/valuable position. In this case, that adjustment comes out to -11.0 runs, as you can see here:   So despite apparently having a bona fide Gold Glove season, Santana’s Fielding Runs value (FanGraphs’ equivalent to dWAR) is barely above average, at 1.1 runs.    Any good WAR calculation is going to adjust for position. Being a good 1B just isn’t worth as much as being an average SS or catcher. Just as being a good LF isn’t worth as much as being an average CF. Every outfielder can play LF — only the best outfielders can play CF.  Where the nuance/context shows up here is with Cowser’s unique situation. Playing LF in OPACY, with all that ground to cover, is not the same as playing LF at Fenway or Yankee Stadium. Treating Cowser’s “position” as equivalent to Tyler O’Neill’s, for example, is not fair. The degree of difficulty is much, much higher at OPACY’s LF, and so the adjustment seems out of whack for him. That’s the one place where I’d say the bWAR value is “unfair” to Cowser.
    • Wait a second here, the reason he's -0.1 in bb-ref dwar is because they're using drs to track his defensive run value.  He's worth 6.6 runs in defense according to fangraphs, which includes adjustments for position, which would give him a fangraphs defensive war of +0.7.
    • A little funny to have provided descriptions of the hits (“weak” single; “500 foot” HR). FIP doesn’t care about any of that either, so it’s kind of an odd thing to add in an effort to make ERA look bad.  Come in, strike out the first hitter, then give up three 108 MPH rocket doubles off the wall. FIP thinks you were absolutely outstanding, and it’s a shame your pathetic defense and/or sheer bad luck let you down. Next time you’ll (probably) get the outcomes you deserve. They’re both flawed. So is xFIP. So is SIERA. So is RA/9. So is WPA. So is xERA. None of them are perfect measures of how a pitcher’s actual performance was, because there’s way too much context and too many variables for any one metric to really encompass.  But when I’m thinking about awards, for me at least, it ends up having to be about the actual outcomes. I don’t really care what a hitter’s xWOBA is when I’m thinking about MVP, and the same is true for pitchers. Did you get the outs? Did the runs score? That’s the “value” that translates to the scoreboard and, ultimately, to the standings. So I think the B-R side of it is more sensible for awards.  I definitely take into account the types of factors that you (and other pitching fWAR advocates) reference as flaws. So if a guy plays in front of a particular bad defense or had a particularly high percentage of inherited runners score, I’d absolutely adjust my take to incorporate that info. And I also 100% go to Fangraphs first when I’m trying to figure out which pitchers we should acquire (i.e., for forward looking purposes).  But I just can’t bring myself say that my Cy Young is just whichever guy had the best ratio of Ks to BBs to HRs over a threshold number of innings. As @Frobby said, it just distills out too much of what actually happened.
    • We were all a lot younger in 2005.  No one wanted to believe Canseco cause he’s a smarmy guy. Like I said, he was the only one telling the truth. It wasn’t a leap of faith to see McGwire up there and Sosa up there and think “yeah, those guys were juicing” but then suddenly look at Raffy and think he was completely innocent.  It’s a sad story. The guy should be in Hall of Fame yet 500 homers and 3,000 hits are gone like a fart in the wind cause his legacy is wagging his finger and thinking he couldn’t get caught.  Don’t fly too close to the sun.  
    • I think if we get the fun sprinkler loving Gunnar that was in the dugout yesterday, I don’t think we have to worry about him pressing. He seemed loose and feeling good with the other guys he was with, like Kremer.
    • I was a lot younger back then, but that betrayal hit really hard because he had been painting himself as literally holier than thou, and shook his finger to a congressional committee and then barely 2 weeks later failed the test.
    • Not bad, but Mullins needs to be at Centerfield for his range, glove, and defensive ability. Top teir premium defense cannot be underestimated. Kjerstad will be on the bench. I think the question is whether Slater or Cowser plays. I would prefer Ramirez over Slater if they need another right handed bat. Sig needs to look at Adleys recent sample sizes vs LHP before making him DH. McCann is catching for Burnes and hitting the left handed pitcher. He's also on a hot streak.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...