Jump to content

Final grade for the Orioles’ 2022-23 offseason?


Frobby

Final grade for the Orioles 2022-23 offseason?  

98 members have voted

  1. 1. What’s your final grade for the O’s 2022-23 offseason?


This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 03/30/23 at 20:21

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Bahama O's Fan said:

So, let's compare:

Kyle instead of Lyles-Probably upgrade

Irvin for whoever-upgrade

McCaan for backup catcher-upgrade

Frazier for Odor-upgrade

Other stuff-insignificant

The team has definitely been upgraded but we could have and should have done SO MUCH MORE!! We needed on premium bat and one premium starter.

Gibson-Probably, but not a clear upgrade.

Irvin move was solid.

McCaan- As a catcher he's an upgrade, if they actually play him at first and DH it's not an overall upgrade.

I don't look at it as Frazier for Odor, I view it as Frazier vs the in-house candidates.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

Gibson-Probably, but not a clear upgrade.

Irvin move was solid.

McCaan- As a catcher he's an upgrade, if they actually play him at first and DH it's not an overall upgrade.

I don't look at it as Frazier for Odor, I view it as Frazier vs the in-house candidates.

Yeah, I just viewed it as who they lost vs who they added. If it was keep Odor or sign Frazier, then I would prefer Frazier. But, I agree with you, I would rather see the kids. Hope Frazier ends up sitting alot as the season moves along. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I voted C but I can't really disagree with anyone who voted D.  If Irvin is a solid mid-back end rotation guy then that move alone deserves a lot of credit.  The Frazier signing is still baffling and I really think Elias planned on trading Urias / Mateo and it hasn't panned out yet.  Worst case a few 1 year deals for modest money don't work out to improve the team.  It's not like Elias signed some long term crippling contract ala Chris Davis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My opinion is that the grade is a C- or a D+.  I am going with a C here as they are not options.  But it's a very low C.

The lineup is improved.  Each of the moves were upgrades on their replacements.  SP, Backup Catcher, 2b.

The issues have been well covered.  There was an opportunity to make this a pretty competitive team and this was more tinkering than lift off.

Frazier...I think is overblown, but like everyone else I don't really see the value.  I mean if insurance to make someone earn the spot was the goal, I think that could have been done for less than 8 Million.

I do think the avoidance of long term commitments is overlooked a bit here.  But I get that because as someone above said, it almost feels like you are wasting one of your years.

All of that said, there are many ways this team can be improved from here.  It has talent, youth, experience and more depth and speed than I can recall for a very long time.

Now, my hope is that all of our angst in the club on opening day is proven wrong by another Oriole team that far exceeds expectations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it weren't for the expectations festered by talk of really doing something, I'd probably voted a meh - C. But, settled on D because I am really disappointed we didn't do more. Who's fault that is is up for conjecture. Could be a number of factors drove this off-season and we have rehashed that thesis. 

Here we go with a similar team to last year and hope they can even do better. Be interesting at the end, how we grade the season!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I will give it a D based on what I saw as the possibilities. 

Gibson is essentially Lyles and I was hoping for one of the 2nd tier guys or a trade for a stud. Gibson is 3rd tier at best.

I like the Irvin deal

Frazier is a head scratcher for all the reasons previously mentioned. 

I like McCann deal

The overstocking of left handed !B/OF options was weird, unless it was for AAA depth all along. 

All the catchers on the 40 man at the beginning was weird too. 

I mean, I guess the O's are better but not as much as they could have been with some basic and frankly obvious moves. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I went with an F.  I'm usually a pretty easy grader on these but just thought this offseason was such an easy opportunity to significantly augment the club and they didn't do that.

I guess they didn't saddle themselves with any really dumb long-term contracts so I guess I'll give them an F+.

EDIT - Dang man, I gave them a lower score than webbrick.  I need to go evaluate my life.

Edited by glenn__davis
  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, glenn__davis said:

I went with an F.  I'm usually a pretty easy grader on these but just thought this offseason was such an easy opportunity to significantly augment the club and they didn't do that.

I guess they didn't saddle themselves with any really dumb long-term contracts so I guess I'll give them an F+.

EDIT - Dang man, I gave them a lower score than webbrick.  I need to go evaluate my life.

He's probably more upset about it than you are.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd go with D- if that was an option; it's a D, but just barely, and only thanks to the Irwin trade. The whole off-season was a wasted opportunity, filled with either lateral moves (Gibson, Givens), head-scratchers (Frazier), or marginal changes. I know that long-term success will ultimately depend on how the youth movement pans out, but an impact reinforcement here or there would have gone a long way. Elias has demonstrated his player-development acumen, but his roster-construction acumen remains a mystery.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Lift Off" and "not on MLK Day" ruined the off-season and moves the needle downward just on optics alone!

But I went C with my orange tinted glasses because OD is almost here!

OBP was a gap and that's Frazier's strength.  TBD if it works out...  Still scratching my head over the why when we had soo many shots on goal at 2B and other roster needs.  But Elias made a questionable signing last year with Lyles and that panned out.  I'm hoping that same Elias Magic works out with Frazier too!

Improving the SP IP was needed.  Gibson is an upgrade over Lyles.  Hernaiz/Irvin is a mid-term win.  Neither are the TOR, but it bumps our fringy arms to AAA.

Givens was a solid signing.

If AFL is considered off-season move, then sending Kjerstad to the AFL gets a W too.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
    • The entire commentary on Hyde and the team seems odd but have to admit there does seem to be something off.   Team seemed adrift for most of the 2nd half.  A very talented team went off the rails midway through the season mostly due to core players struggling and rookies not performing or filling in adequately for a few injured starters.    None of the position player trade line acquisitions performed that well.     Hyde seemed in over his head or at a loss on how to correct things, but he must have convinced Elias that he has a plan to fix things.  Curious to see what happens with the coaching staff.  
    • And or give up picks for QO pitchers 
    • They've averaged 92 wins a year the last 3 years in the most difficult environment in the sport with basically the greatest disadvantages in the sport. Something tells me they know a hell of a lot more about this than you do.    
    • Not when they aren't worthy. At minimum the hitting coaches should be el gonezo
    • That is the sign of a stable and successful organization.  Firing people.  Who could argue that?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...