Jump to content

Gunnar Henderson 2023


Just Regular

Recommended Posts

Here's what I found awesome about Gunnars 3 run HR yesterday.. that LA pitcher, Reyes, IS a good pitcher BUT is kind of a one-trick pony. Let me explain: Near every pitch Reyes threw, was over 90mph.. sinker, slider, whatever he was throwing and fairly accurate. He obviously made it personal in the sense that he was working the batters hard.. i cant remember the name of the batter who was 1 or 2 before Henderson, but when Reyes struck him-out, there was definitely some interaction.. the batter gave him a bit of the "f*** that guy* look, and Reyes, made a chopping motion.

NOW.. back to Henderson. When he stood at the plate, Reyes tried to do the same thing and intimidate him with hard, fast, and surprisingly accurate throws. Henderson's too good though. He demolished that pitch and broke Reyes who was then pulled out immediately. Hahaha.. it was like a giant battle of who's got the bigger "base"balls and Henderson was like.. yeah.. no. 🤣 Love this team

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, connja said:

For those who say Gunner is hands down ROY, his stats are almost identical to Jung in more games.  What sets him apart and what is driving the higher WAR? 

For WAR, I'd guess the biggest factor is the 64 games played, 49 games started, at SS. SS is valued higher than 3b by both versions of WAR, so he's getting extra credit for the time spent there. 

In real baseball another thing setting Gunnar apart is that he's an excellent baserunner and Jung is a weak baserunner. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, connja said:

For those who say Gunner is hands down ROY, his stats are almost identical to Jung in more games.  What sets him apart and what is driving the higher WAR? 

Jung is injured and out for the year.  Gunnar will continue to accumulate stats.  Moreover, Gunnar is arguably the best player on the best team in the AL. In 1982, Kent Hrbek’s offensive year was arguably better than Cal’s -848 OPS vs 792 OPS.   Cal was younger, played a premium position, and played for a better team.  History looked kindly on the decision of the voters. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, connja said:

For those who say Gunner is hands down ROY, his stats are almost identical to Jung in more games.  What sets him apart and what is driving the higher WAR? 

It's a lot of small differences at the margins that, when added together, give you the 0.7 WAR.  Gunnar is 5 runs better as a baserunner.  Jung plays in Texas so park effects ding him a little bit because it's a better place to hit than Camden.  And Gunnar has 60 more plate appearances to accumulate value.  Fangraphs actually gives Jung an edge defensively even with the smaller positional adjustment at 3rd.

 

For whatever reason, DRS *loves* Gunnar's defense, so his WAR on bbref is a bit inflated because of that.  That number doesn't pass the sniff test for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Hallas said:

It's a lot of small differences at the margins that, when added together, give you the 0.7 WAR.  Gunnar is 5 runs better as a baserunner.  Jung plays in Texas so park effects ding him a little bit because it's a better place to hit than Camden.  And Gunnar has 60 more plate appearances to accumulate value.  Fangraphs actually gives Jung an edge defensively even with the smaller positional adjustment at 3rd.

 

For whatever reason, DRS *loves* Gunnar's defense, so his WAR on bbref is a bit inflated because of that.  That number doesn't pass the sniff test for me.

Surprised you say that. His OAA seems very inaccurate to me.  Eye test tells me he is at least in the top 1/3 of fielders at his positions.  And isn’t “loves” a bit of an exaggeration?  If so then they really love Volpe who the times I have seen him doesn’t appear that special and has a noodle arm. 

Edited by baltfan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, baltfan said:

Surprised you say that. His OAA seems very inaccurate to me.  Eye test tells me he is at least in the top 1/3 of fielders at his positions.  And isn’t “loves” a bit of an exaggeration?  If so then they really love Volpe who the times I have seen him doesn’t appear that special and has a noodle arm. 

I don't think it's an exaggeration at all to say DRS loves his defense.  He's +9 by DRS in 50 games' worth of innings at short, and his DRS/yr is +24.  Volpe is at +15, and his DRS/yr is +16.  They think Gunnar would outplay Volpe by nearly a full win if he kept this up over a full season at short.

 

He feels like an average-ish defender to me, but I could be convinced he's slightly above average.  I'm dinging him for his early-season throwing troubles, even though they haven't cropped up recently.

 

There's no shame in being an average-ish defender at short, especially if you're OPSing .815 in a pitcher's park.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Hallas said:

I don't think it's an exaggeration at all to say DRS loves his defense.  He's +9 by DRS in 50 games' worth of innings at short, and his DRS/yr is +24.  Volpe is at +15, and his DRS/yr is +16.  They think Gunnar would outplay Volpe by nearly a full win if he kept this up over a full season at short.

 

He feels like an average-ish defender to me, but I could be convinced he's slightly above average.  I'm dinging him for his early-season throwing troubles, even though they haven't cropped up recently.

 

There's no shame in being an average-ish defender at short, especially if you're OPSing .815 in a pitcher's park.

I think you are selling him a bit short. The one clear weakness I have seen though has been on going back on balls at SS. He doesn’t seem to get a good jump.  But all of this is hard to know since he moves around a fair amount.  I guess we will see.  Look at the huge improvement Witt Jr made. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think he’s better than an average SS but I’m not convinced that he’s some all world, elite SS which is the level of defense some here lead you to believe he is at. He still may get better over there but defense tends to peak early and for a bigger guy, I’m not convinced that third isn’t his best position long term.

That said, his athleticism and his arm Are off the charts, so he can keep getting better over there if they decide to keep him there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Aristotelian said:

Would Wander Franco's extension be a reasonable comp?

No. He’s not signing that deal.

The best we can hope for an extension until he is 29 or 30 years old..so a 7-8 year deal.

Nothing wrong with that. I would be very happy.

He is going to make in the area of 45-50M, if things go well, the next 5 years. I think a 2 year extension on that is very possible. I think 3 years is possible but not sure I would call it likely.

I would be surprised if he turned down a 7/110ish type extension right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

No. He’s not signing that deal.

The best we can hope for an extension until he is 29 or 30 years old..so a 7-8 year deal.

Nothing wrong with that. I would be very happy.

He is going to make in the area of 45-50M, if things go well, the next 5 years. I think a 2 year extension on that is very possible. I think 3 years is possible but not sure I would call it likely.

I would be surprised if he turned down a 7/110ish type extension right now.

7/150 I’d think would be the starting number to get his team to even answer the call, and I don’t think we’ll do it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Angelos did fight the relocation.  He voted against, lobbied against it, withheld permission to adjust TV territories, and threatened to sue if not fairly compensated.  As long as the team was compensated for the loss of broadcast exclusivity, I don’t think he had any other case. From all reports, he drove a hard bargain and it took like 9 months to negotiate a compensation and settlement agreement. There was a wide discrepancy among various parties about what constituted just compensation with Angelos taking more pessimistic views of the impact of the Nats franchise and less optimistic view on MASN. Also, MASN was in perpetuity not temporary.  In hindsight, MASN probably didn’t provide the revenue protection intended because of how the dispute played out and how the RSN market collapsed, but that’s in hindsight. Overall, Angelos “won” the MASN dispute (at least the RSDC process) more than he lost it - the Nationals advocated for rights fees intentionally designed to bankrupt MASN but the RSDC didn’t use their comps. Overall, I think it’s fair to say that relocating a team to DC has hurt the Baltimore club’s market size and ability to fund a top-10 payroll.   HOWEVER, had the Nats not come to DC, the specter of an Orioles relocation to DC would have been hanging over our heads especially as Peter’s health declined, the stadium aged, and the lease approached. Peter would never have moved, but are we sure JA would turn down a higher offer of say $2.3BN offer from Ted Leonsis or someone with the intent to move the club to DC? I think as an Orioles fan it’s probably best to have another team in DC than have to worry about the Orioles ever relocating there.
    • Everything revolves around the health of the player. I think Gunnar has more. I think the collision with Mateo set Gunnar back and affected him in ways we will never know. I'm no mind specialist but Gunnar is young plays all out, and that had to bother him. I've watched that collision a number of times. No fault - just two players going all out and one is finished for the year. It just so happened that Gunnar got the yips and his batting went south soon thereafter. Maybe a coincidence but I think we will see a rejuvenated Gunnar next year and all stops are off. 
    • I’m not so sure the bolded part is true. I think a lot of that last bit can have to do with small skills: situational hitting/running, above average play in close games, generally things that can be boiled down to “luck.” I didn’t see this years team as having a major talent discrepancy from the 2023 version.
    • As great as Gunnar is can’t assume he matches last year. That said I like the odds of the team as a whole matching what we did. 
    • The real improvement of this team will come from within.    The 3-5 players they bring in from outside the org will supplement the roster…maybe put it over the top but the real improvement will come from those already in the org.
    • Yeah. -Would love to keep Burnes but I seriously doubt it. -I have a lot of faith in Adley.  - Holliday has huge ceiling even if he isn’t ready to be elite.  - doesn’t always work this way but the better your closer is tends to help rest of pen 
    • Nice OP. Thanks for the effort. Like the chart. Surprised it hasn't received much response. You sum up a lot of what I hope for as well. I'd add: I think a full - healty year of Westy will be even more valuable. I think Gunnar has even more in the tank. I want - hope that Holliday can develop into the lead off hitter and OBP table setter we need. And, I so want Cowser to cut down on strike outs and continue to develop as a professional hitter. I think he has the potential to cover for the loss of Santander while Big K develops on the right side. A lot to hope for but I believe these youngsters have a lot of potential yet to tap. And oh yes - I want Mayo to make Roy and all of us proud! Thanks again for the effort! I look at pitching as if we have a base. I agree with your points 1 and 2.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...