Jump to content

Cade Povich 2023


Getz

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, panick said:

Do you really think Johnson might be the first man up next year? Is this the same Seth Johnson that pitched 27 innings last year in the High-A level. The one who is recovering from TJ surgery? 

Depends on how soon they need a starter and how he recovers from the surgery, but he will be 25 and unlike the other two, will be on the 40-man roster.

I doubt they would have traded for him and carried him on the 40-man roster all off-season (with plans to do so again in the 2023-24 offseason) if they didn't expect him to be an option in 2024.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, MurphDogg said:

Depends on how soon they need a starter and how he recovers from the surgery, but he will be 25 and unlike the other two, will be on the 40-man roster.

I doubt they would have traded for him and carried him on the 40-man roster all off-season (with plans to do so again in the 2023-24 offseason) if they didn't expect him to be an option in 2024.

Love the depth, but we have a logjam brewing. If Means fully recovers and is effective at the end of this year and Wells bounces back from his recent spate of bad starts, then we have Means, Wells, Kremer, Bradish and GRod all vying for (expecting?) rotation spots. If the O's sign a FA starter then there's even less opportunity for Povich, etc.

It will be fascinating to see how Elias constructs the rotation next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Frobby said:

Twice consecutively would be nice.  It doesn’t even need to be this good, just pretty good.  That hasn’t happened all year. 

 

I'm curious what your definition of pretty good is.  

July 8 - 5 IP, 2 H, 1 ER, 2 BB, 9 K

July 16 -  5 IP, 2 H, 2 ER, 2 BB, 7 K

If that's not pretty good, then I'm not sure we'd ever be on the same page.  He had a horrible first outing for Norfolk at the end of July, but his numbers were "pretty good" for the entire month which totaled 4 starts in Bowie.   

 

I'm with you on the inconsistency though, it's mind numbing.  I'm almost wondering if he's struggling on the every 6 days and hasn't figured that out.  He was every 7 days at Nebraska, and I believe JUCO when I checked out his numbers when he committed.  There is some talk on Husker boards that he signed up with Tread very recently.  I'm going to keep a close eye on that.  As a casual fan, everything Povich does seems effortless and it looks like he has more in the tank.      

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Povich has a ways to go to show consistency before he's a major league starter option. His fastball, cutter, curveball and sweeper all have above average spin rates from what I can see and we've seen when he getting ahead, he can be very, very tough to hit. 

He threw 63% fastball (60% in zone) and cutters (52% in Zone) in this games so the plan was probably to increase his command of those two offerings. The cutter got hit pretty hard the two times it was put in play, but clearly that's a small sample size and cutters typical get hit hard when they are not commanded.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, HuskerFan said:

 

I'm curious what your definition of pretty good is.  

July 8 - 5 IP, 2 H, 1 ER, 2 BB, 9 K

July 16 -  5 IP, 2 H, 2 ER, 2 BB, 7 K

If that's not pretty good, then I'm not sure we'd ever be on the same page.  He had a horrible first outing for Norfolk at the end of July, but his numbers were "pretty good" for the entire month which totaled 4 starts in Bowie.   

 

I'm with you on the inconsistency though, it's mind numbing.  I'm almost wondering if he's struggling on the every 6 days and hasn't figured that out.  He was every 7 days at Nebraska, and I believe JUCO when I checked out his numbers when he committed.  There is some talk on Husker boards that he signed up with Tread very recently.  I'm going to keep a close eye on that.  As a casual fan, everything Povich does seems effortless and it looks like he has more in the tank.      

 

I guess I overlooked that one, since with the all star break, there were 8 days between outings.  Those outings both meet my definition of good.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, bluedog said:

Love the depth, but we have a logjam brewing. If Means fully recovers and is effective at the end of this year and Wells bounces back from his recent spate of bad starts, then we have Means, Wells, Kremer, Bradish and GRod all vying for (expecting?) rotation spots. If the O's sign a FA starter then there's even less opportunity for Povich, etc.

It will be fascinating to see how Elias constructs the rotation next year.

Irvin?  A logjam of starters next year?  Who woulda thunk it?

Edited by RZNJ
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RZNJ said:

Irvin?  A logjam of starters next year?  Who woulda thunk it?

I don't think Irvin sniffs the rotation next year short of injuries. I think he's long lefty out of the pen more or less permanently.

But yeah - starter logjam is crazy. Even crazier, all five of them were either drafted or acquired by waivers, rule 5 or trade when they were in the minors and developed! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, George Zuverink said:

“Logjam” is becoming one of my favorite words.

There is a scenario where next year we have Pham, McDermott & Povich all at AAA pitching lights out and creating the same issue we have with positional depth on the pitching side.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, bluedog said:

There is a scenario where next year we have Pham, McDermott & Povich all at AAA pitching lights out and creating the same issue we have with positional depth on the pitching side.

I am skeptical on all 3 but strength in numbers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s virtually impossible to have too much starting pitching, and it’s very important to have a constant quality pipeline of minor league SP that you can call upon when injuries test your depth. The attrition rate is just so massive between injuries & effectiveness that perennially competitive teams all have that pipeline. Hopefully Povich is part of the start of that pipeline developing here.

The Orioles have been very fortunate with their SP health this season (knock on wood). You’re essentially guaranteed to need at least 6 SP in a season. Going into next year, they should have Bradish, Grayson and Means as rotation locks, and Kremer and Wells have options. Irvin will be out of options and is a good fit in the pen as the long man / swing starter.

So they should add at least one SP pushing Kremer and Wells into SP5/6, and could even accommodate adding another SP on top of that given both having options. Particularly if Wells and Hall shape up to be more bullpen pieces going forward, depending on how the rest of the season goes. Povich and McDermott should slot in behind them in 2024, and then we just go from there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BP with some arsenal analysis using two of his AAA games:

Cade Povich, LHP, Baltimore Orioles
Listed Height: 6-foot-3
Listed Weight: 185 pounds
DOB (Age): April 12, 2000 (23)
Rank: 174

Statcast Pitch Data: 7/28, 8/3

Pitch Velo Spin Vert Horiz Total % Strike% Whiff% CSW%
4-Seam Fastball 92.0 2288 15.9 9.7 57 39.9 54.4 23.5 31.6
Cutter 88.1 2422 26.3 -2.3 37 25.9 64.9 27.8 29.7
Changeup 84.0 1942 30.1 13.7 23 16.1 60.9 36.4 30.4
Curveball 75.5 2417 64.1 -11.0 18 12.6 61.1 40.0 44.4
Sweeper 80.5 2357 41.8 -14.5 8 5.6 62.5 75.0 50.0

The Orioles quietly acquired Povich from the Twins in the Jorge López trade. While he lacks an impact fastball, he boasts an impressive arsenal of secondaries. His cutter is similar to the cutters of Matt Strahm and Wade Miley, both of which are solid-average offerings. Povich’s changeup has solid velocity and vertical movement separation from his fastball. Both his curveball and sweeper have good depth and sweep. All four secondaries project as average or better offerings. It is not the sexiest profile, but Povich has No. 4 starter upside with sneaky bat-missing potential (32.4% K% this year).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I have to think that 5/6 will get more competitive, at least. 
    • I have not seen any reports of a limit on the number of qualifying offers a team can make.   I disagree that Santander is unlikely to receive a QO, or that he will accept it if he gets one.  Of course, it depends how the rest of his season plays out.  But I’ve been on record that if Santander has a season as good as the last two (120/121 OPS+), he should get a QO and will turn it down.  Right now he’s at 131 OPS+, so we’ll see how it goes from here.  
    • I was curious how GRod would pitch given that huge crowd and electric atmosphere. I feel like he has a tendency to get too amped up and overthrow. Granted I didn’t start watching until inning 3, but he looked absolutely in control and executed his pitches.  Certainly a big step forward as far as I’m concerned.
    • Unless Santander goes on an absolute tear the rest of the season, I don't think he turns down a qualifying offer. And even then, it'd be real easy to look at FA deals for 30-ish year old outfielders who are good regulars but not stars and realize there's a good chance he won't beat a QO in guaranteed money, especially with a QO attached. As much as I'd like the pick, I don't want to gamble 20-30M and another year of stunted opportunity for our young outfielders on Santander turning down a QO.
    • Yeah, it's getting to the point where I'm not going to cry if McDermott finishes the year in AAA. I'm not against bringing him up necessarily, but he's clearly got more work to do on control/command if he wants to be a good major league starter long-term.
    • Are there any other qualifications other than signing a contract for 50+M?  A contract of that value spread over 3-4 years would give him a raise and make other teams give some consideration to sign him.  I think that's the only way a QO would work for him.  But I don't think they put him in jeopardy - altho the Orioles could match an offer, I suppose.  I think they value him pretty highly even if he won't command top money. 
    • I did say "unlikely" before "no matter what." Now that I re-read that though, it's kind of a bizarre sentence so I can see why you interpreted it that way. Of course there's a shot a player taken at 1-22 succeeds. Elias is certainly above average at drafting, possibly well above average, but the odds are still against him here, as they are for pretty much any individual pick he makes. I'm not trying to knock Elias here, just stating the fact that the vast majority of players selected in the back of the first round don't turn into solid regulars and so you shouldn't pass up someone you think is more likely to succeed here to draft "for need." I'm certain someone who will be available at this pick will have an incredible major league career. The odds are against it being whoever we draft though. That's just math.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...