Jump to content

Orioles Nemesis Optioned to Rookie Ball...


Billy F-Face3

Recommended Posts

23 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

We are (mostly, I'm assuming) grown adults who **** around on a message board every day for our favorite baseball team.

Some of us sit around and pontificate on and on about hypothetical trades.  Some of us take pride in being able to analyze how much the Orioles revenue is and, in turn, how much they can realistically spend in free agency.  Some of us freak out when we trade a player and the return that we receive.  Others of us freak out on free agents we've signed.

This whole thing is absolutely silly.  If you can't grasp that, then we can't do business.  So yes, HE GOT SENT DOWN TO ROOKIE BALL LOL!!!!

FAFO bro right?

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

You got me!

Maybe the O's would be stupid and not do it.

They are taking a player without an injury and sending him to the facility they have with all the experts and equipment to get rehabilitated players to the level they need to be to compete at the level their skill set indicates.

It's that simple.

 

If it is so simple, why have the Orioles and so few other teams done it regularly? Why wouldn't they bring the experts to their AA or AAA locations? Yeah, nothing to see here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

If it is so simple, why have the Orioles and so few other teams done it regularly? Why wouldn't they bring the experts to their AA or AAA locations? Yeah, nothing to see here. 

Because it's a pretty uncommon situation.

What makes more sense, moving a bunch of equipment and personnel to a location or moving one person to a location?

I'm not even sure what you are doing here?  You can't honestly think the former makes more sense than the latter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Because it's a pretty uncommon situation.

What makes more sense, moving a bunch of equipment and personnel to a location or moving one person to a location?

I'm not even sure what you are doing here?  You can't honestly think the former makes more sense than the latter.

A struggling veteran with an option is very common. It seems weird this is happening. I am not doing anything, just asking questions :)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

A struggling veteran with an option is very common. It seems weird this is happening. I am not doing anything, just asking questions :)

 

BS.

This isn't common.

This is Roy Halladay 2.0.

You don't see a guy that was top 3 CY Young, top 20 MVP one season go to arguably worst pitcher in the league in a season without an injury very often.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

BS.

This isn't common.

This is Roy Halladay 2.0.

You don't see a guy that was top 3 CY Young, top 20 MVP one season go to arguably worst pitcher in the league in a season without an injury very often.

But Manoah is injured.

He's a fat turd.

  • Haha 2
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

BS.

This isn't common.

This is Roy Halladay 2.0.

You don't see a guy that was top 3 CY Young, top 20 MVP one season go to arguably worst pitcher in the league in a season without an injury very often.

Ah, so it is kind of a big deal then? Yes, it is uncommon for pitchers of that stature to struggle so badly, but if going down to rookie ball is a simple thing why isn't it done more for pitchers of lesser stature? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Pickles said:

But Manoah is injured.

He's a fat turd.

He is inexcusably fat. Unless you are a part of the 1% of humans who are genuinely diseased then you should not be extremely obese. I'm not talking about a little extra 15 around the middle that 90% of men over the age of 35 have (and a significant portion of young men have them too), but I'm talking about a true fatass. Carrying a little bit of weight around the middle is in many ways part of being an adult. Priorities shift. But my gosh, there's no excuse to be that overweight. He looks disgusting. 

Edited by Mr-splash
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Aristotelian said:

Ah, so it is kind of a big deal then? Yes, it is uncommon for pitchers of that stature to struggle so badly, but if going down to rookie ball is a simple thing why isn't it done more for pitchers of lesser stature? 

It's a big deal that someone with his track record got demoted.

It is not a big deal that they chose to send him to rookie ball once they decided to send him down.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr-splash said:

He is inexcusably fat. Unless you are a part of the 1% of humans who are genuinely diseased then you should not be extremely obese. I'm not talking about a little extra 15 around the middle that 90% of men over the age of 35 have (and a significant porition of young men have them too), but I'm talking about a true fatass. Carrying a little bit of weight around the middle is in many ways part of being an adult. Priorities shift. But my gosh, there's no excuse to be that overweight. He looks disgusting. 

I'm tired of walking on eggshells: Fat people are gross and should be separated from the general population, particularly when eating.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

It's a big deal that someone with his track record got demoted.

It is not a big deal that they chose to send him to rookie ball once they decided to send him down.

 

Seems like it might be a big deal. Medium deal, at least. The fact that he is struggling so bad that he was not sent to AAA or AA is noteworthy. The whole thing is unusual.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Pickles said:

I'm tired of walking on eggshells: Fat people are gross and should be separated from the general population, particularly when eating.

It is an outward indicator of lack of self control. It means you've eaten way too much food. Being fat is the most cruel vice because you can't hide gluttony unlike other vices. A man with a gambling problem can walk down the street and nobody knows. A fat man walks down the street and everybody knows he can't control his eating. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Pickles said:

I'm tired of walking on eggshells: Fat people are gross and should be separated from the general population, particularly when eating.

Also on an airplane  I am tall and the seats are always getting smaller and can't always get the emergency exit row. Then inevitably the person from that stupid TLC  tv show happens to be a seatmate. My 1,000 pound airplane seatmate.It would make great tv.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • No, as it appears to be a group think decision, where all have some input.  In the end it really doesn't matter if it's all Elias, Sigbot or Hyde or some combination of the 3, Hyde is the one who defends it to the media/fans, and he's the one who gets paid to take the critism/blame.  Either way, starting Slater is the move that WHOEVER make the decisions appears to love, so that's what I expect to see, even if it doesn't make sense based on this years performances.
    • I’m guessing he may be bulk reliever later in game. Have to see. 
    • You think Hyde alone makes the decision?
    • Gil has been terrible in his last 2 starts, he has  given up 10 earned runs in 11 innings
    • It's a meaningless game so hard to read anything into it. It could also be more of an "opener" gambit so that Davidson can be brought in with favorable matchups. For a team that believes so strongly in matchups, I don't know why we don't use the opener more often, especially when it has been effective against us. 
    • Both are deserving. That’s not the point. How they construct the pen in ‘25 may be different. None of the guys you mentioned have been pen guys, although McDermott probably should be. Young and Rogers are more of a starter repertoire. Armbruster and others, like Tony said in another thread, should be pen arms. You need flexible and effective arms to move up and down, while they gain experience. We need some guys with some swing and miss stuff. Adding Bautista back into the back end moves everyone down a notch, but some of the guys we have now will likely have to move on for the purposes of flexibility. There is always some natural turnover, and for good reason. 
    • And?  If they were buying his career stats, then they were fooled by a bait and switch.  Yeah, career numbers are good, but they don't reflect the reality of this year.  .541 OPS against LHP.  Elias/Hyde has a tendency to bring in guys who might have had good career numbers, but who are not playing at that level in the current year, but then letting them play like they are performing at career levels.  Slaters numbers this year don't reflect that he should be getting starts versus LHP over Cowser, even with the struggles Cowser has had.  That said, I fully expect to see Slater starting as that's the move Hyde will love, and will then speak eloquently at how great Slater is hitting against LHP this year, even though that's clearly a lie.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...